Cargando…

Reconstructive Surgery for Severe Penile Inadequacy: Phalloplasty with a Free Radial Forearm Flap or a Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap

Objectives. Severe penile inadequacy in adolescents is rare. Phallic reconstruction to treat this devastating condition is a major challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. Phallic reconstruction using the free radial forearm flap (RFF) or the pedicled anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF) has been routine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lumen, N., Monstrey, S., Ceulemans, P., van Laecke, E., Hoebeke, P.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2581740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19009034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/704343
_version_ 1782160637991845888
author Lumen, N.
Monstrey, S.
Ceulemans, P.
van Laecke, E.
Hoebeke, P.
author_facet Lumen, N.
Monstrey, S.
Ceulemans, P.
van Laecke, E.
Hoebeke, P.
author_sort Lumen, N.
collection PubMed
description Objectives. Severe penile inadequacy in adolescents is rare. Phallic reconstruction to treat this devastating condition is a major challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. Phallic reconstruction using the free radial forearm flap (RFF) or the pedicled anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF) has been routinely used in female-to-male transsexuals. Recently we started to use these techniques in the treatment of severe penile inadequacy. Methods. Eleven males (age 15 to 42 years) were treated with a phallic reconstruction. The RFF is our method of choice; the ALTF is an alternative when a free flap is contraindicated or less desired by the patient. The RFF was used in 7 patients, the ALTF in 4 patients. Mean followup was 25 months (range: 4–49 months). Aesthetic and functional results were evaluated. Results. There were no complications related to the flap. Aesthetic results were judged as “good” in 9 patients and “moderate” in 2 patients. Sensitivity in the RFF was superior compared to the ALTF. Four patients developed urinary complications (stricture and/or fistula). Six patients underwent erectile implant surgery. In 2 patients the erectile implant had to be removed due to infection or erosion. Conclusion. In case of severe penile inadequacy due to whatever condition, a phalloplasty is the preferred treatment nowadays. The free radial forearm flap is still the method of choice. The anterolateral thigh flap can be a good alternative, especially when free flaps are contraindicated, but sensitivity is markedly inferior in these flaps.
format Text
id pubmed-2581740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25817402008-11-13 Reconstructive Surgery for Severe Penile Inadequacy: Phalloplasty with a Free Radial Forearm Flap or a Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap Lumen, N. Monstrey, S. Ceulemans, P. van Laecke, E. Hoebeke, P. Adv Urol Clinical Study Objectives. Severe penile inadequacy in adolescents is rare. Phallic reconstruction to treat this devastating condition is a major challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. Phallic reconstruction using the free radial forearm flap (RFF) or the pedicled anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF) has been routinely used in female-to-male transsexuals. Recently we started to use these techniques in the treatment of severe penile inadequacy. Methods. Eleven males (age 15 to 42 years) were treated with a phallic reconstruction. The RFF is our method of choice; the ALTF is an alternative when a free flap is contraindicated or less desired by the patient. The RFF was used in 7 patients, the ALTF in 4 patients. Mean followup was 25 months (range: 4–49 months). Aesthetic and functional results were evaluated. Results. There were no complications related to the flap. Aesthetic results were judged as “good” in 9 patients and “moderate” in 2 patients. Sensitivity in the RFF was superior compared to the ALTF. Four patients developed urinary complications (stricture and/or fistula). Six patients underwent erectile implant surgery. In 2 patients the erectile implant had to be removed due to infection or erosion. Conclusion. In case of severe penile inadequacy due to whatever condition, a phalloplasty is the preferred treatment nowadays. The free radial forearm flap is still the method of choice. The anterolateral thigh flap can be a good alternative, especially when free flaps are contraindicated, but sensitivity is markedly inferior in these flaps. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2008 2008-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2581740/ /pubmed/19009034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/704343 Text en Copyright © 2008 N. Lumen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Lumen, N.
Monstrey, S.
Ceulemans, P.
van Laecke, E.
Hoebeke, P.
Reconstructive Surgery for Severe Penile Inadequacy: Phalloplasty with a Free Radial Forearm Flap or a Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap
title Reconstructive Surgery for Severe Penile Inadequacy: Phalloplasty with a Free Radial Forearm Flap or a Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap
title_full Reconstructive Surgery for Severe Penile Inadequacy: Phalloplasty with a Free Radial Forearm Flap or a Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap
title_fullStr Reconstructive Surgery for Severe Penile Inadequacy: Phalloplasty with a Free Radial Forearm Flap or a Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap
title_full_unstemmed Reconstructive Surgery for Severe Penile Inadequacy: Phalloplasty with a Free Radial Forearm Flap or a Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap
title_short Reconstructive Surgery for Severe Penile Inadequacy: Phalloplasty with a Free Radial Forearm Flap or a Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap
title_sort reconstructive surgery for severe penile inadequacy: phalloplasty with a free radial forearm flap or a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2581740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19009034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/704343
work_keys_str_mv AT lumenn reconstructivesurgeryforseverepenileinadequacyphalloplastywithafreeradialforearmflaporapedicledanterolateralthighflap
AT monstreys reconstructivesurgeryforseverepenileinadequacyphalloplastywithafreeradialforearmflaporapedicledanterolateralthighflap
AT ceulemansp reconstructivesurgeryforseverepenileinadequacyphalloplastywithafreeradialforearmflaporapedicledanterolateralthighflap
AT vanlaeckee reconstructivesurgeryforseverepenileinadequacyphalloplastywithafreeradialforearmflaporapedicledanterolateralthighflap
AT hoebekep reconstructivesurgeryforseverepenileinadequacyphalloplastywithafreeradialforearmflaporapedicledanterolateralthighflap