Cargando…

Cavities and Atomic Packing in Protein Structures and Interfaces

A comparative analysis of cavities enclosed in a tertiary structure of proteins and interfaces formed by the interaction of two protein subunits in obligate and non-obligate categories (represented by homodimeric molecules and heterocomplexes, respectively) is presented. The total volume of cavities...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sonavane, Shrihari, Chakrabarti, Pinak
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2582456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19005575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000188
_version_ 1782160670559567872
author Sonavane, Shrihari
Chakrabarti, Pinak
author_facet Sonavane, Shrihari
Chakrabarti, Pinak
author_sort Sonavane, Shrihari
collection PubMed
description A comparative analysis of cavities enclosed in a tertiary structure of proteins and interfaces formed by the interaction of two protein subunits in obligate and non-obligate categories (represented by homodimeric molecules and heterocomplexes, respectively) is presented. The total volume of cavities increases with the size of the protein (or the interface), though the exact relationship may vary in different cases. Likewise, for individual cavities also there is quantitative dependence of the volume on the number of atoms (or residues) lining the cavity. The larger cavities tend to be less spherical, solvated, and the interfaces are enriched in these. On average 15 Å(3) of cavity volume is found to accommodate single water, with another 40–45 Å(3) needed for each additional solvent molecule. Polar atoms/residues have a higher propensity to line solvated cavities. Relative to the frequency of occurrence in the whole structure (or interface), residues in β-strands are found more often lining the cavities, and those in turn and loop the least. Any depression in one chain not complemented by a protrusion in the other results in a cavity in the protein–protein interface. Through the use of the Voronoi volume, the packing of residues involved in protein–protein interaction has been compared to that in the protein interior. For a comparable number of atoms the interface has about twice the number of cavities relative to the tertiary structure.
format Text
id pubmed-2582456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25824562008-11-13 Cavities and Atomic Packing in Protein Structures and Interfaces Sonavane, Shrihari Chakrabarti, Pinak PLoS Comput Biol Research Article A comparative analysis of cavities enclosed in a tertiary structure of proteins and interfaces formed by the interaction of two protein subunits in obligate and non-obligate categories (represented by homodimeric molecules and heterocomplexes, respectively) is presented. The total volume of cavities increases with the size of the protein (or the interface), though the exact relationship may vary in different cases. Likewise, for individual cavities also there is quantitative dependence of the volume on the number of atoms (or residues) lining the cavity. The larger cavities tend to be less spherical, solvated, and the interfaces are enriched in these. On average 15 Å(3) of cavity volume is found to accommodate single water, with another 40–45 Å(3) needed for each additional solvent molecule. Polar atoms/residues have a higher propensity to line solvated cavities. Relative to the frequency of occurrence in the whole structure (or interface), residues in β-strands are found more often lining the cavities, and those in turn and loop the least. Any depression in one chain not complemented by a protrusion in the other results in a cavity in the protein–protein interface. Through the use of the Voronoi volume, the packing of residues involved in protein–protein interaction has been compared to that in the protein interior. For a comparable number of atoms the interface has about twice the number of cavities relative to the tertiary structure. Public Library of Science 2008-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2582456/ /pubmed/19005575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000188 Text en Sonavane, Chakrabarti. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sonavane, Shrihari
Chakrabarti, Pinak
Cavities and Atomic Packing in Protein Structures and Interfaces
title Cavities and Atomic Packing in Protein Structures and Interfaces
title_full Cavities and Atomic Packing in Protein Structures and Interfaces
title_fullStr Cavities and Atomic Packing in Protein Structures and Interfaces
title_full_unstemmed Cavities and Atomic Packing in Protein Structures and Interfaces
title_short Cavities and Atomic Packing in Protein Structures and Interfaces
title_sort cavities and atomic packing in protein structures and interfaces
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2582456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19005575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000188
work_keys_str_mv AT sonavaneshrihari cavitiesandatomicpackinginproteinstructuresandinterfaces
AT chakrabartipinak cavitiesandatomicpackinginproteinstructuresandinterfaces