Cargando…
Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review
BACKGROUND: Over a period of 40 years, SNOMED has developed from a pathology-specific nomenclature (SNOP) into a logic-based health care terminology. In spite of its long existence and continuous evolvement, it is yet unknown to what extent SNOMED is used in clinical practice, and what benefits were...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2582789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19007439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-8-S1-S2 |
_version_ | 1782160706067496960 |
---|---|
author | Cornet, Ronald de Keizer, Nicolette |
author_facet | Cornet, Ronald de Keizer, Nicolette |
author_sort | Cornet, Ronald |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Over a period of 40 years, SNOMED has developed from a pathology-specific nomenclature (SNOP) into a logic-based health care terminology. In spite of its long existence and continuous evolvement, it is yet unknown to what extent SNOMED is used in clinical practice, and what benefits were achieved. The aim of this paper is to investigate this by providing an overview of published studies in which a version of SNOMED was studied or applied. METHODS: This paper analyzes the use of SNOMED over time, as reflected in scientific publications, by means of Medline literature search in PubMed. The search included papers from 1966 until June 2006. For each selected paper the following characteristics were classified: version, medical domain, coding moment (during or after the care process), usage, and type of evaluation (e.g., does SNOMED work, does SNOMED help). RESULTS: 250 papers were included in this research. The number of annual publications has increased, as has the number of domains in which SNOMED is being used. Theoretical studies mainly concern comparison of SNOMED to other terminological systems and SNOMED as an illustration of a terminological systems' theory. Few studies are available on the usage of SNOMED in clinical practice, largely involving coding information and retrieval/aggregation based on SNOMED codes. CONCLUSION: The clinical application of SNOMED is broadening beyond pathology. The majority of studies concern proving the value of SNOMED in theory. Fewer studies are available on the usage of SNOMED in clinical practice. Literature gives no indication of the use of SNOMED for direct care purposes such as decision support. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2582789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25827892008-11-14 Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review Cornet, Ronald de Keizer, Nicolette BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Proceedings BACKGROUND: Over a period of 40 years, SNOMED has developed from a pathology-specific nomenclature (SNOP) into a logic-based health care terminology. In spite of its long existence and continuous evolvement, it is yet unknown to what extent SNOMED is used in clinical practice, and what benefits were achieved. The aim of this paper is to investigate this by providing an overview of published studies in which a version of SNOMED was studied or applied. METHODS: This paper analyzes the use of SNOMED over time, as reflected in scientific publications, by means of Medline literature search in PubMed. The search included papers from 1966 until June 2006. For each selected paper the following characteristics were classified: version, medical domain, coding moment (during or after the care process), usage, and type of evaluation (e.g., does SNOMED work, does SNOMED help). RESULTS: 250 papers were included in this research. The number of annual publications has increased, as has the number of domains in which SNOMED is being used. Theoretical studies mainly concern comparison of SNOMED to other terminological systems and SNOMED as an illustration of a terminological systems' theory. Few studies are available on the usage of SNOMED in clinical practice, largely involving coding information and retrieval/aggregation based on SNOMED codes. CONCLUSION: The clinical application of SNOMED is broadening beyond pathology. The majority of studies concern proving the value of SNOMED in theory. Fewer studies are available on the usage of SNOMED in clinical practice. Literature gives no indication of the use of SNOMED for direct care purposes such as decision support. BioMed Central 2008-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2582789/ /pubmed/19007439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-8-S1-S2 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cornet and de Keizer; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Proceedings Cornet, Ronald de Keizer, Nicolette Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review |
title | Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review |
title_full | Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review |
title_fullStr | Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review |
title_short | Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review |
title_sort | forty years of snomed: a literature review |
topic | Proceedings |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2582789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19007439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-8-S1-S2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cornetronald fortyyearsofsnomedaliteraturereview AT dekeizernicolette fortyyearsofsnomedaliteraturereview |