Cargando…

Neural Correlates of True Memory, False Memory, and Deception

We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to determine whether neural activity can differentiate between true memory, false memory, and deception. Subjects heard a series of semantically related words and were later asked to make a recognition judgment of old words, semantically related n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abe, Nobuhito, Okuda, Jiro, Suzuki, Maki, Sasaki, Hiroshi, Matsuda, Tetsuya, Mori, Etsuro, Tsukada, Minoru, Fujii, Toshikatsu
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2583150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18372290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn037
_version_ 1782160733315792896
author Abe, Nobuhito
Okuda, Jiro
Suzuki, Maki
Sasaki, Hiroshi
Matsuda, Tetsuya
Mori, Etsuro
Tsukada, Minoru
Fujii, Toshikatsu
author_facet Abe, Nobuhito
Okuda, Jiro
Suzuki, Maki
Sasaki, Hiroshi
Matsuda, Tetsuya
Mori, Etsuro
Tsukada, Minoru
Fujii, Toshikatsu
author_sort Abe, Nobuhito
collection PubMed
description We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to determine whether neural activity can differentiate between true memory, false memory, and deception. Subjects heard a series of semantically related words and were later asked to make a recognition judgment of old words, semantically related nonstudied words (lures for false recognition), and unrelated new words. They were also asked to make a deceptive response to half of the old and unrelated new words. There were 3 main findings. First, consistent with the notion that executive function supports deception, 2 types of deception (pretending to know and pretending not to know) recruited prefrontal activity. Second, consistent with the sensory reactivation hypothesis, the difference between true recognition and false recognition was found in the left temporoparietal regions probably engaged in the encoding of auditorily presented words. Third, the left prefrontal cortex was activated during pretending to know relative to correct rejection and false recognition, whereas the right anterior hippocampus was activated during false recognition relative to correct rejection and pretending to know. These findings indicate that fMRI can detect the difference in brain activity between deception and false memory despite the fact that subjects respond with “I know” to novel events in both processes.
format Text
id pubmed-2583150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25831502009-02-25 Neural Correlates of True Memory, False Memory, and Deception Abe, Nobuhito Okuda, Jiro Suzuki, Maki Sasaki, Hiroshi Matsuda, Tetsuya Mori, Etsuro Tsukada, Minoru Fujii, Toshikatsu Cereb Cortex Articles We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to determine whether neural activity can differentiate between true memory, false memory, and deception. Subjects heard a series of semantically related words and were later asked to make a recognition judgment of old words, semantically related nonstudied words (lures for false recognition), and unrelated new words. They were also asked to make a deceptive response to half of the old and unrelated new words. There were 3 main findings. First, consistent with the notion that executive function supports deception, 2 types of deception (pretending to know and pretending not to know) recruited prefrontal activity. Second, consistent with the sensory reactivation hypothesis, the difference between true recognition and false recognition was found in the left temporoparietal regions probably engaged in the encoding of auditorily presented words. Third, the left prefrontal cortex was activated during pretending to know relative to correct rejection and false recognition, whereas the right anterior hippocampus was activated during false recognition relative to correct rejection and pretending to know. These findings indicate that fMRI can detect the difference in brain activity between deception and false memory despite the fact that subjects respond with “I know” to novel events in both processes. Oxford University Press 2008-12 2008-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2583150/ /pubmed/18372290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn037 Text en © 2008 The Authors This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Abe, Nobuhito
Okuda, Jiro
Suzuki, Maki
Sasaki, Hiroshi
Matsuda, Tetsuya
Mori, Etsuro
Tsukada, Minoru
Fujii, Toshikatsu
Neural Correlates of True Memory, False Memory, and Deception
title Neural Correlates of True Memory, False Memory, and Deception
title_full Neural Correlates of True Memory, False Memory, and Deception
title_fullStr Neural Correlates of True Memory, False Memory, and Deception
title_full_unstemmed Neural Correlates of True Memory, False Memory, and Deception
title_short Neural Correlates of True Memory, False Memory, and Deception
title_sort neural correlates of true memory, false memory, and deception
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2583150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18372290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn037
work_keys_str_mv AT abenobuhito neuralcorrelatesoftruememoryfalsememoryanddeception
AT okudajiro neuralcorrelatesoftruememoryfalsememoryanddeception
AT suzukimaki neuralcorrelatesoftruememoryfalsememoryanddeception
AT sasakihiroshi neuralcorrelatesoftruememoryfalsememoryanddeception
AT matsudatetsuya neuralcorrelatesoftruememoryfalsememoryanddeception
AT morietsuro neuralcorrelatesoftruememoryfalsememoryanddeception
AT tsukadaminoru neuralcorrelatesoftruememoryfalsememoryanddeception
AT fujiitoshikatsu neuralcorrelatesoftruememoryfalsememoryanddeception