Cargando…
Osseointegration of zirconia implants: an SEM observation of the bone-implant interface
BACKGROUND: The successful use of zirconia ceramics in orthopedic surgery led to a demand for dental zirconium-based implant systems. Because of its excellent biomechanical characteristics, biocompatibility, and bright tooth-like color, zirconia (zirconium dioxide, ZrO(2)) has the potential to becom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2583968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18990214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-4-25 |
_version_ | 1782160750836449280 |
---|---|
author | Depprich, Rita Zipprich, Holger Ommerborn, Michelle Mahn, Eduardo Lammers, Lydia Handschel, Jörg Naujoks, Christian Wiesmann, Hans-Peter Kübler, Norbert R Meyer, Ulrich |
author_facet | Depprich, Rita Zipprich, Holger Ommerborn, Michelle Mahn, Eduardo Lammers, Lydia Handschel, Jörg Naujoks, Christian Wiesmann, Hans-Peter Kübler, Norbert R Meyer, Ulrich |
author_sort | Depprich, Rita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The successful use of zirconia ceramics in orthopedic surgery led to a demand for dental zirconium-based implant systems. Because of its excellent biomechanical characteristics, biocompatibility, and bright tooth-like color, zirconia (zirconium dioxide, ZrO(2)) has the potential to become a substitute for titanium as dental implant material. The present study aimed at investigating the osseointegration of zirconia implants with modified ablative surface at an ultrastructural level. METHODS: A total of 24 zirconia implants with modified ablative surfaces and 24 titanium implants all of similar shape and surface structure were inserted into the tibia of 12 Göttinger minipigs. Block biopsies were harvested 1 week, 4 weeks or 12 weeks (four animals each) after surgery. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was performed at the bone implant interface. RESULTS: Remarkable bone attachment was already seen after 1 week which increased further to intimate bone contact after 4 weeks, observed on both zirconia and titanium implant surfaces. After 12 weeks, osseointegration without interposition of an interfacial layer was detected. At the ultrastructural level, there was no obvious difference between the osseointegration of zirconia implants with modified ablative surfaces and titanium implants with a similar surface topography. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate similar osseointegration of zirconia and titanium implants at the ultrastructural level. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2583968 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25839682008-11-18 Osseointegration of zirconia implants: an SEM observation of the bone-implant interface Depprich, Rita Zipprich, Holger Ommerborn, Michelle Mahn, Eduardo Lammers, Lydia Handschel, Jörg Naujoks, Christian Wiesmann, Hans-Peter Kübler, Norbert R Meyer, Ulrich Head Face Med Research BACKGROUND: The successful use of zirconia ceramics in orthopedic surgery led to a demand for dental zirconium-based implant systems. Because of its excellent biomechanical characteristics, biocompatibility, and bright tooth-like color, zirconia (zirconium dioxide, ZrO(2)) has the potential to become a substitute for titanium as dental implant material. The present study aimed at investigating the osseointegration of zirconia implants with modified ablative surface at an ultrastructural level. METHODS: A total of 24 zirconia implants with modified ablative surfaces and 24 titanium implants all of similar shape and surface structure were inserted into the tibia of 12 Göttinger minipigs. Block biopsies were harvested 1 week, 4 weeks or 12 weeks (four animals each) after surgery. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was performed at the bone implant interface. RESULTS: Remarkable bone attachment was already seen after 1 week which increased further to intimate bone contact after 4 weeks, observed on both zirconia and titanium implant surfaces. After 12 weeks, osseointegration without interposition of an interfacial layer was detected. At the ultrastructural level, there was no obvious difference between the osseointegration of zirconia implants with modified ablative surfaces and titanium implants with a similar surface topography. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate similar osseointegration of zirconia and titanium implants at the ultrastructural level. BioMed Central 2008-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2583968/ /pubmed/18990214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-4-25 Text en Copyright © 2008 Depprich et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Depprich, Rita Zipprich, Holger Ommerborn, Michelle Mahn, Eduardo Lammers, Lydia Handschel, Jörg Naujoks, Christian Wiesmann, Hans-Peter Kübler, Norbert R Meyer, Ulrich Osseointegration of zirconia implants: an SEM observation of the bone-implant interface |
title | Osseointegration of zirconia implants: an SEM observation of the bone-implant interface |
title_full | Osseointegration of zirconia implants: an SEM observation of the bone-implant interface |
title_fullStr | Osseointegration of zirconia implants: an SEM observation of the bone-implant interface |
title_full_unstemmed | Osseointegration of zirconia implants: an SEM observation of the bone-implant interface |
title_short | Osseointegration of zirconia implants: an SEM observation of the bone-implant interface |
title_sort | osseointegration of zirconia implants: an sem observation of the bone-implant interface |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2583968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18990214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-4-25 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT depprichrita osseointegrationofzirconiaimplantsansemobservationoftheboneimplantinterface AT zipprichholger osseointegrationofzirconiaimplantsansemobservationoftheboneimplantinterface AT ommerbornmichelle osseointegrationofzirconiaimplantsansemobservationoftheboneimplantinterface AT mahneduardo osseointegrationofzirconiaimplantsansemobservationoftheboneimplantinterface AT lammerslydia osseointegrationofzirconiaimplantsansemobservationoftheboneimplantinterface AT handscheljorg osseointegrationofzirconiaimplantsansemobservationoftheboneimplantinterface AT naujokschristian osseointegrationofzirconiaimplantsansemobservationoftheboneimplantinterface AT wiesmannhanspeter osseointegrationofzirconiaimplantsansemobservationoftheboneimplantinterface AT kublernorbertr osseointegrationofzirconiaimplantsansemobservationoftheboneimplantinterface AT meyerulrich osseointegrationofzirconiaimplantsansemobservationoftheboneimplantinterface |