Cargando…

A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report

INTRODUCTION: The recognition of neonatal intestinal perforation relies on identification of free gas in the peritoneum on plain abdominal radiographs and the associated clinical signs. The neonatal bowel takes several hours to fill with gas, potentially obscuring one of the radiological signs of bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillies, Martin J, Chowdhury, Moti M, Lakhoo, Kokila
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2584007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18957086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-2-335
_version_ 1782160760070209536
author Gillies, Martin J
Chowdhury, Moti M
Lakhoo, Kokila
author_facet Gillies, Martin J
Chowdhury, Moti M
Lakhoo, Kokila
author_sort Gillies, Martin J
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The recognition of neonatal intestinal perforation relies on identification of free gas in the peritoneum on plain abdominal radiographs and the associated clinical signs. The neonatal bowel takes several hours to fill with gas, potentially obscuring one of the radiological signs of bowel perforation in the neonate. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of a male, Caucasian neonate, born prematurely at 35(+2 )weeks of gestation, who was suspected before birth to be at risk of intestinal perforation, based on antenatal ultrasound signs of bowel obstruction. However, the diagnosis of intestinal perforation after birth was initially delayed because the first abdominal radiograph, requested by the neonatal team, was taken too early in the clinical progression of the neonate's condition. As a consequence, this delayed referral to the paediatric surgical team and definitive management. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates how consideration of the timing of abdominal radiographs in suspected intestinal perforation in the neonate may avoid misinterpretation of radiographic signs, thereby avoiding delays in referral and treatment in the crucial first few hours of life.
format Text
id pubmed-2584007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25840072008-11-18 A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report Gillies, Martin J Chowdhury, Moti M Lakhoo, Kokila J Med Case Reports Case Report INTRODUCTION: The recognition of neonatal intestinal perforation relies on identification of free gas in the peritoneum on plain abdominal radiographs and the associated clinical signs. The neonatal bowel takes several hours to fill with gas, potentially obscuring one of the radiological signs of bowel perforation in the neonate. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of a male, Caucasian neonate, born prematurely at 35(+2 )weeks of gestation, who was suspected before birth to be at risk of intestinal perforation, based on antenatal ultrasound signs of bowel obstruction. However, the diagnosis of intestinal perforation after birth was initially delayed because the first abdominal radiograph, requested by the neonatal team, was taken too early in the clinical progression of the neonate's condition. As a consequence, this delayed referral to the paediatric surgical team and definitive management. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates how consideration of the timing of abdominal radiographs in suspected intestinal perforation in the neonate may avoid misinterpretation of radiographic signs, thereby avoiding delays in referral and treatment in the crucial first few hours of life. BioMed Central 2008-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2584007/ /pubmed/18957086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-2-335 Text en Copyright © 2008 Gillies et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Gillies, Martin J
Chowdhury, Moti M
Lakhoo, Kokila
A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report
title A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report
title_full A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report
title_fullStr A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report
title_full_unstemmed A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report
title_short A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report
title_sort pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2584007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18957086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-2-335
work_keys_str_mv AT gilliesmartinj apitfallintheinterpretationofplainabdnominalradiographsinneonatalintestinalperforationacasereport
AT chowdhurymotim apitfallintheinterpretationofplainabdnominalradiographsinneonatalintestinalperforationacasereport
AT lakhookokila apitfallintheinterpretationofplainabdnominalradiographsinneonatalintestinalperforationacasereport
AT gilliesmartinj pitfallintheinterpretationofplainabdnominalradiographsinneonatalintestinalperforationacasereport
AT chowdhurymotim pitfallintheinterpretationofplainabdnominalradiographsinneonatalintestinalperforationacasereport
AT lakhookokila pitfallintheinterpretationofplainabdnominalradiographsinneonatalintestinalperforationacasereport