Cargando…

Did RNA editing in plant organellar genomes originate under natural selection or through genetic drift?

BACKGROUND: The C↔U substitution types of RNA editing have been observed frequently in organellar genomes of land plants. Although various attempts have been made to explain why such a seemingly inefficient genetic mechanism would have evolved, no satisfactory explanation exists in our view. In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jobson, Richard W, Qiu, Yin-Long
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2584032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18939975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-3-43
_version_ 1782160765043605504
author Jobson, Richard W
Qiu, Yin-Long
author_facet Jobson, Richard W
Qiu, Yin-Long
author_sort Jobson, Richard W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The C↔U substitution types of RNA editing have been observed frequently in organellar genomes of land plants. Although various attempts have been made to explain why such a seemingly inefficient genetic mechanism would have evolved, no satisfactory explanation exists in our view. In this study, we examined editing patterns in chloroplast genomes of the hornwort Anthoceros formosae and the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris and in mitochondrial genomes of the angiosperms Arabidopsis thaliana, Beta vulgaris and Oryza sativa, to gain an understanding of the question of how RNA editing originated. RESULTS: We found that 1) most editing sites were distributed at the 2(nd )and 1(st )codon positions, 2) editing affected codons that resulted in larger hydrophobicity and molecular size changes much more frequently than those with little change involved, 3) editing uniformly increased protein hydrophobicity, 4) editing occurred more frequently in ancestrally T-rich sequences, which were more abundant in genes encoding membrane-bound proteins with many hydrophobic amino acids than in genes encoding soluble proteins, and 5) editing occurred most often in genes found to be under strong selective constraint. CONCLUSION: These analyses show that editing mostly affects functionally important and evolutionarily conserved codon positions, codons and genes encoding membrane-bound proteins. In particular, abundance of RNA editing in plant organellar genomes may be associated with disproportionately large percentages of genes in these two genomes that encode membrane-bound proteins, which are rich in hydrophobic amino acids and selectively constrained. These data support a hypothesis that natural selection imposed by protein functional constraints has contributed to selective fixation of certain editing sites and maintenance of the editing activity in plant organelles over a period of more than four hundred millions years. The retention of genes encoding RNA editing activity may be driven by forces that shape nucleotide composition equilibrium in two organellar genomes of these plants. Nevertheless, the causes of lineage-specific occurrence of a large portion of RNA editing sites remain to be determined. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Michael Gray (nominated by Laurence Hurst), Kirsten Krause (nominated by Martin Lercher), and Jeffery Mower (nominated by David Ardell).
format Text
id pubmed-2584032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25840322008-11-18 Did RNA editing in plant organellar genomes originate under natural selection or through genetic drift? Jobson, Richard W Qiu, Yin-Long Biol Direct Research BACKGROUND: The C↔U substitution types of RNA editing have been observed frequently in organellar genomes of land plants. Although various attempts have been made to explain why such a seemingly inefficient genetic mechanism would have evolved, no satisfactory explanation exists in our view. In this study, we examined editing patterns in chloroplast genomes of the hornwort Anthoceros formosae and the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris and in mitochondrial genomes of the angiosperms Arabidopsis thaliana, Beta vulgaris and Oryza sativa, to gain an understanding of the question of how RNA editing originated. RESULTS: We found that 1) most editing sites were distributed at the 2(nd )and 1(st )codon positions, 2) editing affected codons that resulted in larger hydrophobicity and molecular size changes much more frequently than those with little change involved, 3) editing uniformly increased protein hydrophobicity, 4) editing occurred more frequently in ancestrally T-rich sequences, which were more abundant in genes encoding membrane-bound proteins with many hydrophobic amino acids than in genes encoding soluble proteins, and 5) editing occurred most often in genes found to be under strong selective constraint. CONCLUSION: These analyses show that editing mostly affects functionally important and evolutionarily conserved codon positions, codons and genes encoding membrane-bound proteins. In particular, abundance of RNA editing in plant organellar genomes may be associated with disproportionately large percentages of genes in these two genomes that encode membrane-bound proteins, which are rich in hydrophobic amino acids and selectively constrained. These data support a hypothesis that natural selection imposed by protein functional constraints has contributed to selective fixation of certain editing sites and maintenance of the editing activity in plant organelles over a period of more than four hundred millions years. The retention of genes encoding RNA editing activity may be driven by forces that shape nucleotide composition equilibrium in two organellar genomes of these plants. Nevertheless, the causes of lineage-specific occurrence of a large portion of RNA editing sites remain to be determined. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Michael Gray (nominated by Laurence Hurst), Kirsten Krause (nominated by Martin Lercher), and Jeffery Mower (nominated by David Ardell). BioMed Central 2008-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2584032/ /pubmed/18939975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-3-43 Text en Copyright © 2008 Jobson and Qiu; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Jobson, Richard W
Qiu, Yin-Long
Did RNA editing in plant organellar genomes originate under natural selection or through genetic drift?
title Did RNA editing in plant organellar genomes originate under natural selection or through genetic drift?
title_full Did RNA editing in plant organellar genomes originate under natural selection or through genetic drift?
title_fullStr Did RNA editing in plant organellar genomes originate under natural selection or through genetic drift?
title_full_unstemmed Did RNA editing in plant organellar genomes originate under natural selection or through genetic drift?
title_short Did RNA editing in plant organellar genomes originate under natural selection or through genetic drift?
title_sort did rna editing in plant organellar genomes originate under natural selection or through genetic drift?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2584032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18939975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-3-43
work_keys_str_mv AT jobsonrichardw didrnaeditinginplantorganellargenomesoriginateundernaturalselectionorthroughgeneticdrift
AT qiuyinlong didrnaeditinginplantorganellargenomesoriginateundernaturalselectionorthroughgeneticdrift