Cargando…

Responses to Interaural Time Delay in Human Cortex

Humans use differences in the timing of sounds at the two ears to determine the location of a sound source. Various models have been posited for the neural representation of these interaural time differences (ITDs). These models make opposing predictions about the lateralization of ITD processing in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Kriegstein, Katharina, Griffiths, Timothy D., Thompson, Sarah K., McAlpine, David
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Physiological Society 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2585401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18799604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.90210.2008
_version_ 1782160842405445632
author von Kriegstein, Katharina
Griffiths, Timothy D.
Thompson, Sarah K.
McAlpine, David
author_facet von Kriegstein, Katharina
Griffiths, Timothy D.
Thompson, Sarah K.
McAlpine, David
author_sort von Kriegstein, Katharina
collection PubMed
description Humans use differences in the timing of sounds at the two ears to determine the location of a sound source. Various models have been posited for the neural representation of these interaural time differences (ITDs). These models make opposing predictions about the lateralization of ITD processing in the human brain. The weighted-image model predicts that sounds leading in time at one ear activate maximally the opposite brain hemisphere for all values of ITD. In contrast, the π-limit model assumes that ITDs beyond half the period of the stimulus center frequency are not explicitly encoded in the brain and that such “long” ITDs activate maximally the side of the brain to which the sound is heard. A previous neuroimaging study revealed activity in the human inferior colliculus consistent with the π-limit. Here we show that cortical responses to sounds with ITDs within the π-limit are in line with the predictions of both models. However, contrary to the immediate predictions of both models, neural activation is bilateral for “long” ITDs, despite these being perceived as clearly lateralized. Furthermore, processing of long ITDs leads to higher activation in cortex than processing of short ITDs. These data show that coding of ITD in cortex is fundamentally different from coding of ITD in the brain stem. We discuss these results in the context of the two models.
format Text
id pubmed-2585401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher American Physiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25854012009-11-01 Responses to Interaural Time Delay in Human Cortex von Kriegstein, Katharina Griffiths, Timothy D. Thompson, Sarah K. McAlpine, David J Neurophysiol Articles Humans use differences in the timing of sounds at the two ears to determine the location of a sound source. Various models have been posited for the neural representation of these interaural time differences (ITDs). These models make opposing predictions about the lateralization of ITD processing in the human brain. The weighted-image model predicts that sounds leading in time at one ear activate maximally the opposite brain hemisphere for all values of ITD. In contrast, the π-limit model assumes that ITDs beyond half the period of the stimulus center frequency are not explicitly encoded in the brain and that such “long” ITDs activate maximally the side of the brain to which the sound is heard. A previous neuroimaging study revealed activity in the human inferior colliculus consistent with the π-limit. Here we show that cortical responses to sounds with ITDs within the π-limit are in line with the predictions of both models. However, contrary to the immediate predictions of both models, neural activation is bilateral for “long” ITDs, despite these being perceived as clearly lateralized. Furthermore, processing of long ITDs leads to higher activation in cortex than processing of short ITDs. These data show that coding of ITD in cortex is fundamentally different from coding of ITD in the brain stem. We discuss these results in the context of the two models. American Physiological Society 2008-11 2008-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2585401/ /pubmed/18799604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.90210.2008 Text en Copyright © 2008, American Physiological Society This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to www.the-aps.org/publications/journals/funding_addendum_policy.htm (http://www.the-aps.org/publications/journals/funding_addendum_policy.htm) .
spellingShingle Articles
von Kriegstein, Katharina
Griffiths, Timothy D.
Thompson, Sarah K.
McAlpine, David
Responses to Interaural Time Delay in Human Cortex
title Responses to Interaural Time Delay in Human Cortex
title_full Responses to Interaural Time Delay in Human Cortex
title_fullStr Responses to Interaural Time Delay in Human Cortex
title_full_unstemmed Responses to Interaural Time Delay in Human Cortex
title_short Responses to Interaural Time Delay in Human Cortex
title_sort responses to interaural time delay in human cortex
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2585401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18799604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.90210.2008
work_keys_str_mv AT vonkriegsteinkatharina responsestointerauraltimedelayinhumancortex
AT griffithstimothyd responsestointerauraltimedelayinhumancortex
AT thompsonsarahk responsestointerauraltimedelayinhumancortex
AT mcalpinedavid responsestointerauraltimedelayinhumancortex