Cargando…

Evaluation of two counterflow traps for testing behaviour-mediating compounds for the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. under semi-field conditions in Tanzania

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of mosquito responses towards different trap-bait combinations in field trials is a time-consuming process that can be shortened by experiments in contained semi-field systems. Possible use of the BG Sentinel (BGS) trap to sample Anopheles gambiae s.s. was evaluated. The effic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmied, Wolfgang H, Takken, Willem, Killeen, Gerry F, Knols, Bart GJ, Smallegange, Renate C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2585591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18980669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-230
_version_ 1782160853044297728
author Schmied, Wolfgang H
Takken, Willem
Killeen, Gerry F
Knols, Bart GJ
Smallegange, Renate C
author_facet Schmied, Wolfgang H
Takken, Willem
Killeen, Gerry F
Knols, Bart GJ
Smallegange, Renate C
author_sort Schmied, Wolfgang H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluation of mosquito responses towards different trap-bait combinations in field trials is a time-consuming process that can be shortened by experiments in contained semi-field systems. Possible use of the BG Sentinel (BGS) trap to sample Anopheles gambiae s.s. was evaluated. The efficiency of this trap was compared with that of the Mosquito Magnet-X (MM-X) trap, when baited with foot odour alone or combinations of foot odour with carbon dioxide (CO(2)) or lemongrass as behaviour-modifying cues. METHODS: Female An. gambiae s.s. were released in an experimental flight arena that was placed in a semi-field system and left overnight. Catch rates for the MM-X and BGS traps were recorded. Data were analysed by fitting a generalized linear model to the (n+1) transformed catches. RESULTS: Both types of traps successfully captured mosquitoes with all odour cues used. When the BGS trap was tested against the MM-X trap in a choice assay with foot odour as bait, the BGS trap caught about three times as many mosquitoes as the MM-X trap (P = 0.002). Adding CO(2 )(500 ml/min) to foot odour increased the number of mosquitoes caught by 268% for the MM-X (P < 0.001) and 34% (P = 0.051) for the BGS trap, compared to foot odour alone. When lemongrass leaves were added to foot odour, mosquito catches were reduced by 39% (BGS, P < 0.001) and 38% (MM-X, P = 0.353), respectively. CONCLUSION: The BGS trap shows high potential for field trials due to its simple construction and high catch rate when baited with human foot odour only. However, for rapid screening of different baits in a contained semi-field system, the superior discriminatory power of the MM-X trap is advantageous.
format Text
id pubmed-2585591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25855912008-11-21 Evaluation of two counterflow traps for testing behaviour-mediating compounds for the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. under semi-field conditions in Tanzania Schmied, Wolfgang H Takken, Willem Killeen, Gerry F Knols, Bart GJ Smallegange, Renate C Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Evaluation of mosquito responses towards different trap-bait combinations in field trials is a time-consuming process that can be shortened by experiments in contained semi-field systems. Possible use of the BG Sentinel (BGS) trap to sample Anopheles gambiae s.s. was evaluated. The efficiency of this trap was compared with that of the Mosquito Magnet-X (MM-X) trap, when baited with foot odour alone or combinations of foot odour with carbon dioxide (CO(2)) or lemongrass as behaviour-modifying cues. METHODS: Female An. gambiae s.s. were released in an experimental flight arena that was placed in a semi-field system and left overnight. Catch rates for the MM-X and BGS traps were recorded. Data were analysed by fitting a generalized linear model to the (n+1) transformed catches. RESULTS: Both types of traps successfully captured mosquitoes with all odour cues used. When the BGS trap was tested against the MM-X trap in a choice assay with foot odour as bait, the BGS trap caught about three times as many mosquitoes as the MM-X trap (P = 0.002). Adding CO(2 )(500 ml/min) to foot odour increased the number of mosquitoes caught by 268% for the MM-X (P < 0.001) and 34% (P = 0.051) for the BGS trap, compared to foot odour alone. When lemongrass leaves were added to foot odour, mosquito catches were reduced by 39% (BGS, P < 0.001) and 38% (MM-X, P = 0.353), respectively. CONCLUSION: The BGS trap shows high potential for field trials due to its simple construction and high catch rate when baited with human foot odour only. However, for rapid screening of different baits in a contained semi-field system, the superior discriminatory power of the MM-X trap is advantageous. BioMed Central 2008-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2585591/ /pubmed/18980669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-230 Text en Copyright © 2008 Schmied et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Schmied, Wolfgang H
Takken, Willem
Killeen, Gerry F
Knols, Bart GJ
Smallegange, Renate C
Evaluation of two counterflow traps for testing behaviour-mediating compounds for the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. under semi-field conditions in Tanzania
title Evaluation of two counterflow traps for testing behaviour-mediating compounds for the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. under semi-field conditions in Tanzania
title_full Evaluation of two counterflow traps for testing behaviour-mediating compounds for the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. under semi-field conditions in Tanzania
title_fullStr Evaluation of two counterflow traps for testing behaviour-mediating compounds for the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. under semi-field conditions in Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of two counterflow traps for testing behaviour-mediating compounds for the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. under semi-field conditions in Tanzania
title_short Evaluation of two counterflow traps for testing behaviour-mediating compounds for the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. under semi-field conditions in Tanzania
title_sort evaluation of two counterflow traps for testing behaviour-mediating compounds for the malaria vector anopheles gambiae s.s. under semi-field conditions in tanzania
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2585591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18980669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-230
work_keys_str_mv AT schmiedwolfgangh evaluationoftwocounterflowtrapsfortestingbehaviourmediatingcompoundsforthemalariavectoranophelesgambiaessundersemifieldconditionsintanzania
AT takkenwillem evaluationoftwocounterflowtrapsfortestingbehaviourmediatingcompoundsforthemalariavectoranophelesgambiaessundersemifieldconditionsintanzania
AT killeengerryf evaluationoftwocounterflowtrapsfortestingbehaviourmediatingcompoundsforthemalariavectoranophelesgambiaessundersemifieldconditionsintanzania
AT knolsbartgj evaluationoftwocounterflowtrapsfortestingbehaviourmediatingcompoundsforthemalariavectoranophelesgambiaessundersemifieldconditionsintanzania
AT smallegangerenatec evaluationoftwocounterflowtrapsfortestingbehaviourmediatingcompoundsforthemalariavectoranophelesgambiaessundersemifieldconditionsintanzania