Cargando…
Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations
BACKGROUND: Structure-based computational methods are needed to help identify and characterize protein-protein complexes and their function. For individual proteins, the most successful technique is homology modelling. We investigate a simple extension of this technique to protein-protein complexes....
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2586029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18844985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-427 |
_version_ | 1782160876641452032 |
---|---|
author | Launay, Guillaume Simonson, Thomas |
author_facet | Launay, Guillaume Simonson, Thomas |
author_sort | Launay, Guillaume |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Structure-based computational methods are needed to help identify and characterize protein-protein complexes and their function. For individual proteins, the most successful technique is homology modelling. We investigate a simple extension of this technique to protein-protein complexes. We consider a large set of complexes of known structures, involving pairs of single-domain proteins. The complexes are compared with each other to establish their sequence and structural similarities and the relation between the two. Compared to earlier studies, a simpler dataset, a simpler structural alignment procedure, and an additional energy criterion are used. Next, we compare the Xray structures to models obtained by threading the native sequence onto other, homologous complexes. An elementary requirement for a successful energy function is to rank the native structure above any threaded structure. We use the DFIRE(β )energy function, whose quality and complexity are typical of the models used today. Finally, we compare near-native models to distinctly non-native models. RESULTS: If weakly stable complexes are excluded (defined by a binding energy cutoff), as well as a few unusual complexes, a simple homology principle holds: complexes that share more than 35% sequence identity share similar structures and interaction modes; this principle was less clearcut in earlier studies. The energy function was then tested for its ability to identify experimental structures among sets of decoys, produced by a simple threading procedure. On average, the experimental structure is ranked above 92% of the alternate structures. Thus, discrimination of the native structure is good but not perfect. The discrimination of near-native structures is fair. Typically, a single, alternate, non-native binding mode exists that has a native-like energy. Some of the associated failures may correspond to genuine, alternate binding modes and/or native complexes that are artefacts of the crystal environment. In other cases, additional model filtering with more sophisticated tools is needed. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the simple modelling procedure applied here could help identify and characterize protein-protein complexes. The next step is to apply it on a genomic scale. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2586029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25860292008-11-24 Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations Launay, Guillaume Simonson, Thomas BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Structure-based computational methods are needed to help identify and characterize protein-protein complexes and their function. For individual proteins, the most successful technique is homology modelling. We investigate a simple extension of this technique to protein-protein complexes. We consider a large set of complexes of known structures, involving pairs of single-domain proteins. The complexes are compared with each other to establish their sequence and structural similarities and the relation between the two. Compared to earlier studies, a simpler dataset, a simpler structural alignment procedure, and an additional energy criterion are used. Next, we compare the Xray structures to models obtained by threading the native sequence onto other, homologous complexes. An elementary requirement for a successful energy function is to rank the native structure above any threaded structure. We use the DFIRE(β )energy function, whose quality and complexity are typical of the models used today. Finally, we compare near-native models to distinctly non-native models. RESULTS: If weakly stable complexes are excluded (defined by a binding energy cutoff), as well as a few unusual complexes, a simple homology principle holds: complexes that share more than 35% sequence identity share similar structures and interaction modes; this principle was less clearcut in earlier studies. The energy function was then tested for its ability to identify experimental structures among sets of decoys, produced by a simple threading procedure. On average, the experimental structure is ranked above 92% of the alternate structures. Thus, discrimination of the native structure is good but not perfect. The discrimination of near-native structures is fair. Typically, a single, alternate, non-native binding mode exists that has a native-like energy. Some of the associated failures may correspond to genuine, alternate binding modes and/or native complexes that are artefacts of the crystal environment. In other cases, additional model filtering with more sophisticated tools is needed. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the simple modelling procedure applied here could help identify and characterize protein-protein complexes. The next step is to apply it on a genomic scale. BioMed Central 2008-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2586029/ /pubmed/18844985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-427 Text en Copyright © 2008 Launay and Simonson; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Launay, Guillaume Simonson, Thomas Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations |
title | Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations |
title_full | Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations |
title_fullStr | Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations |
title_full_unstemmed | Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations |
title_short | Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations |
title_sort | homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2586029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18844985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-427 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT launayguillaume homologymodellingofproteinproteincomplexesasimplemethodanditspossibilitiesandlimitations AT simonsonthomas homologymodellingofproteinproteincomplexesasimplemethodanditspossibilitiesandlimitations |