Cargando…

Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations

BACKGROUND: Structure-based computational methods are needed to help identify and characterize protein-protein complexes and their function. For individual proteins, the most successful technique is homology modelling. We investigate a simple extension of this technique to protein-protein complexes....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Launay, Guillaume, Simonson, Thomas
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2586029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18844985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-427
_version_ 1782160876641452032
author Launay, Guillaume
Simonson, Thomas
author_facet Launay, Guillaume
Simonson, Thomas
author_sort Launay, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Structure-based computational methods are needed to help identify and characterize protein-protein complexes and their function. For individual proteins, the most successful technique is homology modelling. We investigate a simple extension of this technique to protein-protein complexes. We consider a large set of complexes of known structures, involving pairs of single-domain proteins. The complexes are compared with each other to establish their sequence and structural similarities and the relation between the two. Compared to earlier studies, a simpler dataset, a simpler structural alignment procedure, and an additional energy criterion are used. Next, we compare the Xray structures to models obtained by threading the native sequence onto other, homologous complexes. An elementary requirement for a successful energy function is to rank the native structure above any threaded structure. We use the DFIRE(β )energy function, whose quality and complexity are typical of the models used today. Finally, we compare near-native models to distinctly non-native models. RESULTS: If weakly stable complexes are excluded (defined by a binding energy cutoff), as well as a few unusual complexes, a simple homology principle holds: complexes that share more than 35% sequence identity share similar structures and interaction modes; this principle was less clearcut in earlier studies. The energy function was then tested for its ability to identify experimental structures among sets of decoys, produced by a simple threading procedure. On average, the experimental structure is ranked above 92% of the alternate structures. Thus, discrimination of the native structure is good but not perfect. The discrimination of near-native structures is fair. Typically, a single, alternate, non-native binding mode exists that has a native-like energy. Some of the associated failures may correspond to genuine, alternate binding modes and/or native complexes that are artefacts of the crystal environment. In other cases, additional model filtering with more sophisticated tools is needed. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the simple modelling procedure applied here could help identify and characterize protein-protein complexes. The next step is to apply it on a genomic scale.
format Text
id pubmed-2586029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25860292008-11-24 Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations Launay, Guillaume Simonson, Thomas BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Structure-based computational methods are needed to help identify and characterize protein-protein complexes and their function. For individual proteins, the most successful technique is homology modelling. We investigate a simple extension of this technique to protein-protein complexes. We consider a large set of complexes of known structures, involving pairs of single-domain proteins. The complexes are compared with each other to establish their sequence and structural similarities and the relation between the two. Compared to earlier studies, a simpler dataset, a simpler structural alignment procedure, and an additional energy criterion are used. Next, we compare the Xray structures to models obtained by threading the native sequence onto other, homologous complexes. An elementary requirement for a successful energy function is to rank the native structure above any threaded structure. We use the DFIRE(β )energy function, whose quality and complexity are typical of the models used today. Finally, we compare near-native models to distinctly non-native models. RESULTS: If weakly stable complexes are excluded (defined by a binding energy cutoff), as well as a few unusual complexes, a simple homology principle holds: complexes that share more than 35% sequence identity share similar structures and interaction modes; this principle was less clearcut in earlier studies. The energy function was then tested for its ability to identify experimental structures among sets of decoys, produced by a simple threading procedure. On average, the experimental structure is ranked above 92% of the alternate structures. Thus, discrimination of the native structure is good but not perfect. The discrimination of near-native structures is fair. Typically, a single, alternate, non-native binding mode exists that has a native-like energy. Some of the associated failures may correspond to genuine, alternate binding modes and/or native complexes that are artefacts of the crystal environment. In other cases, additional model filtering with more sophisticated tools is needed. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the simple modelling procedure applied here could help identify and characterize protein-protein complexes. The next step is to apply it on a genomic scale. BioMed Central 2008-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2586029/ /pubmed/18844985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-427 Text en Copyright © 2008 Launay and Simonson; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Launay, Guillaume
Simonson, Thomas
Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations
title Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations
title_full Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations
title_fullStr Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations
title_full_unstemmed Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations
title_short Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations
title_sort homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2586029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18844985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-427
work_keys_str_mv AT launayguillaume homologymodellingofproteinproteincomplexesasimplemethodanditspossibilitiesandlimitations
AT simonsonthomas homologymodellingofproteinproteincomplexesasimplemethodanditspossibilitiesandlimitations