Cargando…
Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine
During the recent years improved operation techniques and administrative procedures have been developed for early rehabilitation. At the same time preoperative lifestyle intervention (prehabilitation) has revealed a large potential for additional risk reduction. The aim was to assess the quality of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2586633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18842157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-209 |
_version_ | 1782160900370726912 |
---|---|
author | Nielsen, Per Rotbøll Andreasen, Jakob Asmussen, Mikael Tønnesen, Hanne |
author_facet | Nielsen, Per Rotbøll Andreasen, Jakob Asmussen, Mikael Tønnesen, Hanne |
author_sort | Nielsen, Per Rotbøll |
collection | PubMed |
description | During the recent years improved operation techniques and administrative procedures have been developed for early rehabilitation. At the same time preoperative lifestyle intervention (prehabilitation) has revealed a large potential for additional risk reduction. The aim was to assess the quality of life and to estimate the cost-effectiveness of standard care versus an integrated programme including prehabilitation and early rehabilitation. METHODS: The analyses were based on the results from 60 patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative lumbar disease; 28 patients were randomised to the integrated programme and 32 to the standard care programme. Data on cost and health related quality of life was collected preoperatively, during hospitalisation and postoperatively. The cost was estimated from multiplication of the resource consumption and price per unit. RESULTS: Overall there was no difference in health related quality of life scores. The patients from the integrated programme obtained their postoperative milestones sooner, returned to work and soaked less primary care after discharge. The integrated programme was 1,625€ (direct costs 494€ + indirect costs 1,131€) less costly per patient compared to the standard care programme. CONCLUSION: The integrated programme of prehabilitation and early rehabilitation in spine surgery is more cost-effective compared to standard care programme alone. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2586633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25866332008-11-25 Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine Nielsen, Per Rotbøll Andreasen, Jakob Asmussen, Mikael Tønnesen, Hanne BMC Health Serv Res Research Article During the recent years improved operation techniques and administrative procedures have been developed for early rehabilitation. At the same time preoperative lifestyle intervention (prehabilitation) has revealed a large potential for additional risk reduction. The aim was to assess the quality of life and to estimate the cost-effectiveness of standard care versus an integrated programme including prehabilitation and early rehabilitation. METHODS: The analyses were based on the results from 60 patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative lumbar disease; 28 patients were randomised to the integrated programme and 32 to the standard care programme. Data on cost and health related quality of life was collected preoperatively, during hospitalisation and postoperatively. The cost was estimated from multiplication of the resource consumption and price per unit. RESULTS: Overall there was no difference in health related quality of life scores. The patients from the integrated programme obtained their postoperative milestones sooner, returned to work and soaked less primary care after discharge. The integrated programme was 1,625€ (direct costs 494€ + indirect costs 1,131€) less costly per patient compared to the standard care programme. CONCLUSION: The integrated programme of prehabilitation and early rehabilitation in spine surgery is more cost-effective compared to standard care programme alone. BioMed Central 2008-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2586633/ /pubmed/18842157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-209 Text en Copyright © 2008 Nielsen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nielsen, Per Rotbøll Andreasen, Jakob Asmussen, Mikael Tønnesen, Hanne Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine |
title | Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine |
title_full | Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine |
title_fullStr | Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine |
title_full_unstemmed | Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine |
title_short | Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine |
title_sort | costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2586633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18842157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-209 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nielsenperrotbøll costsandqualityoflifeforprehabilitationandearlyrehabilitationaftersurgeryofthelumbarspine AT andreasenjakob costsandqualityoflifeforprehabilitationandearlyrehabilitationaftersurgeryofthelumbarspine AT asmussenmikael costsandqualityoflifeforprehabilitationandearlyrehabilitationaftersurgeryofthelumbarspine AT tønnesenhanne costsandqualityoflifeforprehabilitationandearlyrehabilitationaftersurgeryofthelumbarspine |