Cargando…

Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine

During the recent years improved operation techniques and administrative procedures have been developed for early rehabilitation. At the same time preoperative lifestyle intervention (prehabilitation) has revealed a large potential for additional risk reduction. The aim was to assess the quality of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Per Rotbøll, Andreasen, Jakob, Asmussen, Mikael, Tønnesen, Hanne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2586633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18842157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-209
_version_ 1782160900370726912
author Nielsen, Per Rotbøll
Andreasen, Jakob
Asmussen, Mikael
Tønnesen, Hanne
author_facet Nielsen, Per Rotbøll
Andreasen, Jakob
Asmussen, Mikael
Tønnesen, Hanne
author_sort Nielsen, Per Rotbøll
collection PubMed
description During the recent years improved operation techniques and administrative procedures have been developed for early rehabilitation. At the same time preoperative lifestyle intervention (prehabilitation) has revealed a large potential for additional risk reduction. The aim was to assess the quality of life and to estimate the cost-effectiveness of standard care versus an integrated programme including prehabilitation and early rehabilitation. METHODS: The analyses were based on the results from 60 patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative lumbar disease; 28 patients were randomised to the integrated programme and 32 to the standard care programme. Data on cost and health related quality of life was collected preoperatively, during hospitalisation and postoperatively. The cost was estimated from multiplication of the resource consumption and price per unit. RESULTS: Overall there was no difference in health related quality of life scores. The patients from the integrated programme obtained their postoperative milestones sooner, returned to work and soaked less primary care after discharge. The integrated programme was 1,625€ (direct costs 494€ + indirect costs 1,131€) less costly per patient compared to the standard care programme. CONCLUSION: The integrated programme of prehabilitation and early rehabilitation in spine surgery is more cost-effective compared to standard care programme alone.
format Text
id pubmed-2586633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25866332008-11-25 Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine Nielsen, Per Rotbøll Andreasen, Jakob Asmussen, Mikael Tønnesen, Hanne BMC Health Serv Res Research Article During the recent years improved operation techniques and administrative procedures have been developed for early rehabilitation. At the same time preoperative lifestyle intervention (prehabilitation) has revealed a large potential for additional risk reduction. The aim was to assess the quality of life and to estimate the cost-effectiveness of standard care versus an integrated programme including prehabilitation and early rehabilitation. METHODS: The analyses were based on the results from 60 patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative lumbar disease; 28 patients were randomised to the integrated programme and 32 to the standard care programme. Data on cost and health related quality of life was collected preoperatively, during hospitalisation and postoperatively. The cost was estimated from multiplication of the resource consumption and price per unit. RESULTS: Overall there was no difference in health related quality of life scores. The patients from the integrated programme obtained their postoperative milestones sooner, returned to work and soaked less primary care after discharge. The integrated programme was 1,625€ (direct costs 494€ + indirect costs 1,131€) less costly per patient compared to the standard care programme. CONCLUSION: The integrated programme of prehabilitation and early rehabilitation in spine surgery is more cost-effective compared to standard care programme alone. BioMed Central 2008-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2586633/ /pubmed/18842157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-209 Text en Copyright © 2008 Nielsen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nielsen, Per Rotbøll
Andreasen, Jakob
Asmussen, Mikael
Tønnesen, Hanne
Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine
title Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine
title_full Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine
title_fullStr Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine
title_full_unstemmed Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine
title_short Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine
title_sort costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2586633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18842157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-209
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsenperrotbøll costsandqualityoflifeforprehabilitationandearlyrehabilitationaftersurgeryofthelumbarspine
AT andreasenjakob costsandqualityoflifeforprehabilitationandearlyrehabilitationaftersurgeryofthelumbarspine
AT asmussenmikael costsandqualityoflifeforprehabilitationandearlyrehabilitationaftersurgeryofthelumbarspine
AT tønnesenhanne costsandqualityoflifeforprehabilitationandearlyrehabilitationaftersurgeryofthelumbarspine