Cargando…

Methodologies for data collection

BACKGROUND: Electronic disease surveillance systems can be extremely valuable tools; however, a critical step in system implementation is collecting data. Without accurate and complete data, statistical anomalies that are detected hold little meaning. Many people who have established successful surv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, Sheryl Happel, Wojcik, Richard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2587691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19025682
_version_ 1782160921278283776
author Lewis, Sheryl Happel
Wojcik, Richard
author_facet Lewis, Sheryl Happel
Wojcik, Richard
author_sort Lewis, Sheryl Happel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electronic disease surveillance systems can be extremely valuable tools; however, a critical step in system implementation is collecting data. Without accurate and complete data, statistical anomalies that are detected hold little meaning. Many people who have established successful surveillance systems acknowledge the initial data collection process to be one of the most challenging aspects of system implementation. METHODS: This discussion will describe the various methods for collecting data as well as describe some of the more common data feeds used in surveillance systems today. Given that every city/region/country looking to establish a surveillance capability has varying degrees of automated data, alternative data collection methods must be considered. RESULTS: While it would be ideal to collect automated electronic data in a real-time fashion without human intervention, data may also be effectively collected via telephone (both mobile and land lines), fax, and email. Another consideration is what type of data will be used in a surveillance system. If one data source is of high value to one locality, it should not be assumed that it will be as useful in another area. Determining what data sources work best for a particular area is a critical step in system implementation. CONCLUSION: Regardless of data type and how they are collected, surveillance systems can be successful if the implementers and end users understand the limitations of both the data and the collection methodology and incorporate that knowledge into their interpretation procedures.
format Text
id pubmed-2587691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25876912008-11-26 Methodologies for data collection Lewis, Sheryl Happel Wojcik, Richard BMC Proc Proceedings BACKGROUND: Electronic disease surveillance systems can be extremely valuable tools; however, a critical step in system implementation is collecting data. Without accurate and complete data, statistical anomalies that are detected hold little meaning. Many people who have established successful surveillance systems acknowledge the initial data collection process to be one of the most challenging aspects of system implementation. METHODS: This discussion will describe the various methods for collecting data as well as describe some of the more common data feeds used in surveillance systems today. Given that every city/region/country looking to establish a surveillance capability has varying degrees of automated data, alternative data collection methods must be considered. RESULTS: While it would be ideal to collect automated electronic data in a real-time fashion without human intervention, data may also be effectively collected via telephone (both mobile and land lines), fax, and email. Another consideration is what type of data will be used in a surveillance system. If one data source is of high value to one locality, it should not be assumed that it will be as useful in another area. Determining what data sources work best for a particular area is a critical step in system implementation. CONCLUSION: Regardless of data type and how they are collected, surveillance systems can be successful if the implementers and end users understand the limitations of both the data and the collection methodology and incorporate that knowledge into their interpretation procedures. BioMed Central 2008-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2587691/ /pubmed/19025682 Text en Copyright © 2008 Lewis and Wojcik; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Lewis, Sheryl Happel
Wojcik, Richard
Methodologies for data collection
title Methodologies for data collection
title_full Methodologies for data collection
title_fullStr Methodologies for data collection
title_full_unstemmed Methodologies for data collection
title_short Methodologies for data collection
title_sort methodologies for data collection
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2587691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19025682
work_keys_str_mv AT lewissherylhappel methodologiesfordatacollection
AT wojcikrichard methodologiesfordatacollection