Cargando…
Stay@Work: Participatory Ergonomics to prevent low back and neck pain among workers: design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness
BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) are a major public health problem with considerable costs for individuals, companies and society. Therefore, prevention is imperative. The Stay@Work study investigates the (cost-)effectiveness of Participatory Ergonomics (PE) to prevent LBP and NP a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2588446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18959799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-145 |
_version_ | 1782160933318033408 |
---|---|
author | Driessen, Maurice T Anema, Johannes R Proper, Karin I Bongers, Paulien M Beek, Allard J van der |
author_facet | Driessen, Maurice T Anema, Johannes R Proper, Karin I Bongers, Paulien M Beek, Allard J van der |
author_sort | Driessen, Maurice T |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) are a major public health problem with considerable costs for individuals, companies and society. Therefore, prevention is imperative. The Stay@Work study investigates the (cost-)effectiveness of Participatory Ergonomics (PE) to prevent LBP and NP among workers. METHODS: In a randomised controlled trial (RCT), a total of 5,759 workers working at 36 departments of four companies is expected to participate in the study at baseline. The departments consisting of about 150 workers are pre-stratified and randomised. The control departments receive usual practice and the intervention departments receive PE. Within each intervention department a working group is formed including eight workers, a representative of the management, and an occupational health and safety coordinator. During a one day meeting, the working group follows the steps of PE in which the most important risk factors for LBP and NP, and the most adequate ergonomic measures are identified on the basis of group consensus. The implementation of ergonomic measures at the department is performed by the working group. To improve the implementation process, so-called 'ergocoaches' are trained. The primary outcome measure is an episode of LBP and NP. Secondary outcome measures are actual use of ergonomic measures, physical workload, psychosocial workload, intensity of pain, general health status, sick leave, and work productivity. The cost-effectiveness analysis is performed from the societal and company perspective. Outcome measures are assessed using questionnaires at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Data on the primary outcome as well as on intensity of pain, sick leave, work productivity, and health care costs are collected every 3 months. DISCUSSION: Prevention of LBP and NP is beneficial for workers, employers, and society. If the intervention is proven (cost-)effective, the intervention can have a major impact on LBP and NP prevention and, thereby, on work disability prevention. Results are expected in 2010. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN27472278 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2588446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25884462008-11-27 Stay@Work: Participatory Ergonomics to prevent low back and neck pain among workers: design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness Driessen, Maurice T Anema, Johannes R Proper, Karin I Bongers, Paulien M Beek, Allard J van der BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) are a major public health problem with considerable costs for individuals, companies and society. Therefore, prevention is imperative. The Stay@Work study investigates the (cost-)effectiveness of Participatory Ergonomics (PE) to prevent LBP and NP among workers. METHODS: In a randomised controlled trial (RCT), a total of 5,759 workers working at 36 departments of four companies is expected to participate in the study at baseline. The departments consisting of about 150 workers are pre-stratified and randomised. The control departments receive usual practice and the intervention departments receive PE. Within each intervention department a working group is formed including eight workers, a representative of the management, and an occupational health and safety coordinator. During a one day meeting, the working group follows the steps of PE in which the most important risk factors for LBP and NP, and the most adequate ergonomic measures are identified on the basis of group consensus. The implementation of ergonomic measures at the department is performed by the working group. To improve the implementation process, so-called 'ergocoaches' are trained. The primary outcome measure is an episode of LBP and NP. Secondary outcome measures are actual use of ergonomic measures, physical workload, psychosocial workload, intensity of pain, general health status, sick leave, and work productivity. The cost-effectiveness analysis is performed from the societal and company perspective. Outcome measures are assessed using questionnaires at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Data on the primary outcome as well as on intensity of pain, sick leave, work productivity, and health care costs are collected every 3 months. DISCUSSION: Prevention of LBP and NP is beneficial for workers, employers, and society. If the intervention is proven (cost-)effective, the intervention can have a major impact on LBP and NP prevention and, thereby, on work disability prevention. Results are expected in 2010. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN27472278 BioMed Central 2008-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2588446/ /pubmed/18959799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-145 Text en Copyright © 2008 Driessen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Driessen, Maurice T Anema, Johannes R Proper, Karin I Bongers, Paulien M Beek, Allard J van der Stay@Work: Participatory Ergonomics to prevent low back and neck pain among workers: design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness |
title | Stay@Work: Participatory Ergonomics to prevent low back and neck pain among workers: design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness |
title_full | Stay@Work: Participatory Ergonomics to prevent low back and neck pain among workers: design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness |
title_fullStr | Stay@Work: Participatory Ergonomics to prevent low back and neck pain among workers: design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness |
title_full_unstemmed | Stay@Work: Participatory Ergonomics to prevent low back and neck pain among workers: design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness |
title_short | Stay@Work: Participatory Ergonomics to prevent low back and neck pain among workers: design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness |
title_sort | stay@work: participatory ergonomics to prevent low back and neck pain among workers: design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2588446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18959799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT driessenmauricet stayworkparticipatoryergonomicstopreventlowbackandneckpainamongworkersdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethecosteffectiveness AT anemajohannesr stayworkparticipatoryergonomicstopreventlowbackandneckpainamongworkersdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethecosteffectiveness AT properkarini stayworkparticipatoryergonomicstopreventlowbackandneckpainamongworkersdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethecosteffectiveness AT bongerspaulienm stayworkparticipatoryergonomicstopreventlowbackandneckpainamongworkersdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethecosteffectiveness AT beekallardjvander stayworkparticipatoryergonomicstopreventlowbackandneckpainamongworkersdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatethecosteffectiveness |