Cargando…

Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ?

BACKGROUND: The blood based interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) for the diagnosis of tuberculosis do not discriminate between active TB disease and latent TB infection (LTBI). The search for distinguishing biomarkers therefore continues, as the accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis is particularly c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whittaker, Elizabeth, Gordon, Andrea, Kampmann, Beate
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2588495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19065267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003901
_version_ 1782160938300866560
author Whittaker, Elizabeth
Gordon, Andrea
Kampmann, Beate
author_facet Whittaker, Elizabeth
Gordon, Andrea
Kampmann, Beate
author_sort Whittaker, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The blood based interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) for the diagnosis of tuberculosis do not discriminate between active TB disease and latent TB infection (LTBI). The search for distinguishing biomarkers therefore continues, as the accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis is particularly challenging in children. IFN-γ-inducible protein 10 (IP-10/CXCL10) has recently been evaluated as a marker for active TB in adults with promising results. AIM: To investigate this new biomarker for active TB and LTBI in paediatrics. METHOD: We measured IP-10 levels using ELISA in supernatants of whole blood samples stimulated with TB-specific-antigens and negative control antigen. RESULTS: IP-10 is produced in high levels following mycobacterial antigen stimulation in active TB (n = 17) and LTBI (n = 16) compared to controls (n = 16) and to IFN-γ. The baseline levels of IP-10 are increased in active TB and in LTBI, but there is no significant difference of stimulated levels of IP-10 between active TB and LTBI. CONCLUSIONS: IP-10 is a biomarker for tuberculosis in children. However like IFNγ, IP-10 also does not distinguish between active TB and LTBI.
format Text
id pubmed-2588495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25884952008-12-09 Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ? Whittaker, Elizabeth Gordon, Andrea Kampmann, Beate PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The blood based interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) for the diagnosis of tuberculosis do not discriminate between active TB disease and latent TB infection (LTBI). The search for distinguishing biomarkers therefore continues, as the accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis is particularly challenging in children. IFN-γ-inducible protein 10 (IP-10/CXCL10) has recently been evaluated as a marker for active TB in adults with promising results. AIM: To investigate this new biomarker for active TB and LTBI in paediatrics. METHOD: We measured IP-10 levels using ELISA in supernatants of whole blood samples stimulated with TB-specific-antigens and negative control antigen. RESULTS: IP-10 is produced in high levels following mycobacterial antigen stimulation in active TB (n = 17) and LTBI (n = 16) compared to controls (n = 16) and to IFN-γ. The baseline levels of IP-10 are increased in active TB and in LTBI, but there is no significant difference of stimulated levels of IP-10 between active TB and LTBI. CONCLUSIONS: IP-10 is a biomarker for tuberculosis in children. However like IFNγ, IP-10 also does not distinguish between active TB and LTBI. Public Library of Science 2008-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2588495/ /pubmed/19065267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003901 Text en Whittaker et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Whittaker, Elizabeth
Gordon, Andrea
Kampmann, Beate
Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ?
title Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ?
title_full Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ?
title_fullStr Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ?
title_full_unstemmed Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ?
title_short Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ?
title_sort is ip-10 a better biomarker for active and latent tuberculosis in children than ifnγ?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2588495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19065267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003901
work_keys_str_mv AT whittakerelizabeth isip10abetterbiomarkerforactiveandlatenttuberculosisinchildrenthanifng
AT gordonandrea isip10abetterbiomarkerforactiveandlatenttuberculosisinchildrenthanifng
AT kampmannbeate isip10abetterbiomarkerforactiveandlatenttuberculosisinchildrenthanifng