Cargando…
Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ?
BACKGROUND: The blood based interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) for the diagnosis of tuberculosis do not discriminate between active TB disease and latent TB infection (LTBI). The search for distinguishing biomarkers therefore continues, as the accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis is particularly c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2588495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19065267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003901 |
_version_ | 1782160938300866560 |
---|---|
author | Whittaker, Elizabeth Gordon, Andrea Kampmann, Beate |
author_facet | Whittaker, Elizabeth Gordon, Andrea Kampmann, Beate |
author_sort | Whittaker, Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The blood based interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) for the diagnosis of tuberculosis do not discriminate between active TB disease and latent TB infection (LTBI). The search for distinguishing biomarkers therefore continues, as the accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis is particularly challenging in children. IFN-γ-inducible protein 10 (IP-10/CXCL10) has recently been evaluated as a marker for active TB in adults with promising results. AIM: To investigate this new biomarker for active TB and LTBI in paediatrics. METHOD: We measured IP-10 levels using ELISA in supernatants of whole blood samples stimulated with TB-specific-antigens and negative control antigen. RESULTS: IP-10 is produced in high levels following mycobacterial antigen stimulation in active TB (n = 17) and LTBI (n = 16) compared to controls (n = 16) and to IFN-γ. The baseline levels of IP-10 are increased in active TB and in LTBI, but there is no significant difference of stimulated levels of IP-10 between active TB and LTBI. CONCLUSIONS: IP-10 is a biomarker for tuberculosis in children. However like IFNγ, IP-10 also does not distinguish between active TB and LTBI. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2588495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25884952008-12-09 Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ? Whittaker, Elizabeth Gordon, Andrea Kampmann, Beate PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The blood based interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) for the diagnosis of tuberculosis do not discriminate between active TB disease and latent TB infection (LTBI). The search for distinguishing biomarkers therefore continues, as the accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis is particularly challenging in children. IFN-γ-inducible protein 10 (IP-10/CXCL10) has recently been evaluated as a marker for active TB in adults with promising results. AIM: To investigate this new biomarker for active TB and LTBI in paediatrics. METHOD: We measured IP-10 levels using ELISA in supernatants of whole blood samples stimulated with TB-specific-antigens and negative control antigen. RESULTS: IP-10 is produced in high levels following mycobacterial antigen stimulation in active TB (n = 17) and LTBI (n = 16) compared to controls (n = 16) and to IFN-γ. The baseline levels of IP-10 are increased in active TB and in LTBI, but there is no significant difference of stimulated levels of IP-10 between active TB and LTBI. CONCLUSIONS: IP-10 is a biomarker for tuberculosis in children. However like IFNγ, IP-10 also does not distinguish between active TB and LTBI. Public Library of Science 2008-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2588495/ /pubmed/19065267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003901 Text en Whittaker et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Whittaker, Elizabeth Gordon, Andrea Kampmann, Beate Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ? |
title | Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ? |
title_full | Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ? |
title_fullStr | Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ? |
title_short | Is IP-10 a Better Biomarker for Active and Latent Tuberculosis in Children than IFNγ? |
title_sort | is ip-10 a better biomarker for active and latent tuberculosis in children than ifnγ? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2588495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19065267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003901 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whittakerelizabeth isip10abetterbiomarkerforactiveandlatenttuberculosisinchildrenthanifng AT gordonandrea isip10abetterbiomarkerforactiveandlatenttuberculosisinchildrenthanifng AT kampmannbeate isip10abetterbiomarkerforactiveandlatenttuberculosisinchildrenthanifng |