Cargando…

Incidence of genital mycoplasmas in women at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy.

The cervicovaginal and endometrial isolation rates of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis and relevant demographic data were obtained at the time of laparoscopy in 193 women from infertile marriage. For comparative purposes, fertile women undergoing laparoscopy for tubal ligation (n = 56)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cassell, G. H., Brown, M. B., Younger, J. B., Blackwell, R. F., Davis, J. K., Marriott, P., Stagno, S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 1983
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2590557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6236618
_version_ 1782161338222510080
author Cassell, G. H.
Brown, M. B.
Younger, J. B.
Blackwell, R. F.
Davis, J. K.
Marriott, P.
Stagno, S.
author_facet Cassell, G. H.
Brown, M. B.
Younger, J. B.
Blackwell, R. F.
Davis, J. K.
Marriott, P.
Stagno, S.
author_sort Cassell, G. H.
collection PubMed
description The cervicovaginal and endometrial isolation rates of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis and relevant demographic data were obtained at the time of laparoscopy in 193 women from infertile marriage. For comparative purposes, fertile women undergoing laparoscopy for tubal ligation (n = 56) or other purposes (n = 64) were also cultured. Blacks were more likely than caucasians to be infected with either organism in all population types (p less than or equal to .05); however, no differences were noted in cervicovaginal carriage rates for blacks in different patient populations. M. hominis was isolated more frequently from tubal reanastomosis patients and less often from infertile patients, p less than or equal to .001. No differences were noted among the infertile subpopulations. Although the isolation rate of U. urealyticum from the different patient populations was similar, one subpopulation within the infertile population (male factor) was identified in which the prevalence of ureaplasmal infection of the female's lower genital tract was over twice as high (p less than or equal to .005) as in other infertile women. Yet there were no statistically significant differences in the demographic data of this subpopulation as compared to the population of infertile women as a whole. No other clinical subpopulation with single or multiple diagnoses not including male factor had an increased prevalence of infection. Eighty percent of infected, infertile couples had no clinical evidence of male factor infertility, indicating that only certain individuals are affected.This possibly explains why previous studies involving small numbers of patients without regard to clinical subpopulations have failed to show significant differences between infected and uninfected couples.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
format Text
id pubmed-2590557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1983
publisher Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25905572008-11-28 Incidence of genital mycoplasmas in women at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy. Cassell, G. H. Brown, M. B. Younger, J. B. Blackwell, R. F. Davis, J. K. Marriott, P. Stagno, S. Yale J Biol Med Research Article The cervicovaginal and endometrial isolation rates of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis and relevant demographic data were obtained at the time of laparoscopy in 193 women from infertile marriage. For comparative purposes, fertile women undergoing laparoscopy for tubal ligation (n = 56) or other purposes (n = 64) were also cultured. Blacks were more likely than caucasians to be infected with either organism in all population types (p less than or equal to .05); however, no differences were noted in cervicovaginal carriage rates for blacks in different patient populations. M. hominis was isolated more frequently from tubal reanastomosis patients and less often from infertile patients, p less than or equal to .001. No differences were noted among the infertile subpopulations. Although the isolation rate of U. urealyticum from the different patient populations was similar, one subpopulation within the infertile population (male factor) was identified in which the prevalence of ureaplasmal infection of the female's lower genital tract was over twice as high (p less than or equal to .005) as in other infertile women. Yet there were no statistically significant differences in the demographic data of this subpopulation as compared to the population of infertile women as a whole. No other clinical subpopulation with single or multiple diagnoses not including male factor had an increased prevalence of infection. Eighty percent of infected, infertile couples had no clinical evidence of male factor infertility, indicating that only certain individuals are affected.This possibly explains why previous studies involving small numbers of patients without regard to clinical subpopulations have failed to show significant differences between infected and uninfected couples.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 1983 /pmc/articles/PMC2590557/ /pubmed/6236618 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Cassell, G. H.
Brown, M. B.
Younger, J. B.
Blackwell, R. F.
Davis, J. K.
Marriott, P.
Stagno, S.
Incidence of genital mycoplasmas in women at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy.
title Incidence of genital mycoplasmas in women at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy.
title_full Incidence of genital mycoplasmas in women at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy.
title_fullStr Incidence of genital mycoplasmas in women at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy.
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of genital mycoplasmas in women at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy.
title_short Incidence of genital mycoplasmas in women at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy.
title_sort incidence of genital mycoplasmas in women at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2590557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6236618
work_keys_str_mv AT cassellgh incidenceofgenitalmycoplasmasinwomenatthetimeofdiagnosticlaparoscopy
AT brownmb incidenceofgenitalmycoplasmasinwomenatthetimeofdiagnosticlaparoscopy
AT youngerjb incidenceofgenitalmycoplasmasinwomenatthetimeofdiagnosticlaparoscopy
AT blackwellrf incidenceofgenitalmycoplasmasinwomenatthetimeofdiagnosticlaparoscopy
AT davisjk incidenceofgenitalmycoplasmasinwomenatthetimeofdiagnosticlaparoscopy
AT marriottp incidenceofgenitalmycoplasmasinwomenatthetimeofdiagnosticlaparoscopy
AT stagnos incidenceofgenitalmycoplasmasinwomenatthetimeofdiagnosticlaparoscopy