Cargando…
Pro/con debate: Is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization?
You are asked to be involved in organizing a trauma service for a major urban center. You are asked to make a decision on whether the services general approach to trauma in the city (which does have a well-established trauma center) will be scoop and run (minimal resuscitation at the scene with a go...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2592727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18828868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6980 |
_version_ | 1782161566787960832 |
---|---|
author | Haas, Barbara Nathens, Avery B |
author_facet | Haas, Barbara Nathens, Avery B |
author_sort | Haas, Barbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | You are asked to be involved in organizing a trauma service for a major urban center. You are asked to make a decision on whether the services general approach to trauma in the city (which does have a well-established trauma center) will be scoop and run (minimal resuscitation at the scene with a goal to getting the patient to a trauma center as quickly as possible) or on-the-scene resuscitation with transfer following some degree of stabilization. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2592727 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25927272009-09-10 Pro/con debate: Is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization? Haas, Barbara Nathens, Avery B Crit Care Review You are asked to be involved in organizing a trauma service for a major urban center. You are asked to make a decision on whether the services general approach to trauma in the city (which does have a well-established trauma center) will be scoop and run (minimal resuscitation at the scene with a goal to getting the patient to a trauma center as quickly as possible) or on-the-scene resuscitation with transfer following some degree of stabilization. BioMed Central 2008 2008-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2592727/ /pubmed/18828868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6980 Text en Copyright © 2008 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Review Haas, Barbara Nathens, Avery B Pro/con debate: Is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization? |
title | Pro/con debate: Is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization? |
title_full | Pro/con debate: Is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization? |
title_fullStr | Pro/con debate: Is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization? |
title_full_unstemmed | Pro/con debate: Is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization? |
title_short | Pro/con debate: Is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization? |
title_sort | pro/con debate: is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2592727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18828868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6980 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haasbarbara procondebateisthescoopandrunapproachthebestapproachtotraumaservicesorganization AT nathensaveryb procondebateisthescoopandrunapproachthebestapproachtotraumaservicesorganization |