Cargando…

Clinical review: Critical care in the global context – disparities in burden of illness, access, and economics

World health care expenditures exceed US $4 trillion. However, there is marked variation in global health care spending, from upwards of US $7,000 per capita in the US to under US $25 per capita in most of sub-Saharan Africa. In developed countries, care of the critically ill comprises a large propo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fowler, Robert A, Adhikari, Neill KJ, Bhagwanjee, Satish
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2592728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19014409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6984
_version_ 1782161567018647552
author Fowler, Robert A
Adhikari, Neill KJ
Bhagwanjee, Satish
author_facet Fowler, Robert A
Adhikari, Neill KJ
Bhagwanjee, Satish
author_sort Fowler, Robert A
collection PubMed
description World health care expenditures exceed US $4 trillion. However, there is marked variation in global health care spending, from upwards of US $7,000 per capita in the US to under US $25 per capita in most of sub-Saharan Africa. In developed countries, care of the critically ill comprises a large proportion of health care spending; however, in developing countries, with a greater burden of both illness and critical illness, there is little infrastructure to provide care for these patients. There is sparse research to inform the needs of critically ill patients, but often basic requirements such as trained personnel, medications, oxygen, diagnostic and therapeutic equipment, reliable power supply, and safe transportation are unavailable. Why should this be a focus of intensivists of the developed world? Nearly all of those dying in developing countries would be our patients without the accident of latitude. Tailored to the needs of the region, the provision of critical care has a role, even in the context of limited preventive and primary care. Internationally and locally driven solutions are needed. We can help by recognizing the '10/90 gap' that is pervasive within global health care and our profession by educating ourselves of needs, contacting and collaborating with colleagues in the developing world, and advocating that our professional societies and funding agencies consider an increasingly global perspective in education and research.
format Text
id pubmed-2592728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25927282009-09-09 Clinical review: Critical care in the global context – disparities in burden of illness, access, and economics Fowler, Robert A Adhikari, Neill KJ Bhagwanjee, Satish Crit Care Review World health care expenditures exceed US $4 trillion. However, there is marked variation in global health care spending, from upwards of US $7,000 per capita in the US to under US $25 per capita in most of sub-Saharan Africa. In developed countries, care of the critically ill comprises a large proportion of health care spending; however, in developing countries, with a greater burden of both illness and critical illness, there is little infrastructure to provide care for these patients. There is sparse research to inform the needs of critically ill patients, but often basic requirements such as trained personnel, medications, oxygen, diagnostic and therapeutic equipment, reliable power supply, and safe transportation are unavailable. Why should this be a focus of intensivists of the developed world? Nearly all of those dying in developing countries would be our patients without the accident of latitude. Tailored to the needs of the region, the provision of critical care has a role, even in the context of limited preventive and primary care. Internationally and locally driven solutions are needed. We can help by recognizing the '10/90 gap' that is pervasive within global health care and our profession by educating ourselves of needs, contacting and collaborating with colleagues in the developing world, and advocating that our professional societies and funding agencies consider an increasingly global perspective in education and research. BioMed Central 2008 2008-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2592728/ /pubmed/19014409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6984 Text en Copyright © 2008 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Fowler, Robert A
Adhikari, Neill KJ
Bhagwanjee, Satish
Clinical review: Critical care in the global context – disparities in burden of illness, access, and economics
title Clinical review: Critical care in the global context – disparities in burden of illness, access, and economics
title_full Clinical review: Critical care in the global context – disparities in burden of illness, access, and economics
title_fullStr Clinical review: Critical care in the global context – disparities in burden of illness, access, and economics
title_full_unstemmed Clinical review: Critical care in the global context – disparities in burden of illness, access, and economics
title_short Clinical review: Critical care in the global context – disparities in burden of illness, access, and economics
title_sort clinical review: critical care in the global context – disparities in burden of illness, access, and economics
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2592728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19014409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6984
work_keys_str_mv AT fowlerroberta clinicalreviewcriticalcareintheglobalcontextdisparitiesinburdenofillnessaccessandeconomics
AT adhikarineillkj clinicalreviewcriticalcareintheglobalcontextdisparitiesinburdenofillnessaccessandeconomics
AT bhagwanjeesatish clinicalreviewcriticalcareintheglobalcontextdisparitiesinburdenofillnessaccessandeconomics