Cargando…

Tight glycaemic control in the intensive care unit: pitfalls in the testing of the concept

Tight glycaemic control emerged on the scene of critical care in 2001. Surprisingly, not many confirmation trials have been published so far. The randomised controlled trial by De La Rosa and colleagues is a timely and valuable attempt to repeat the landmark Leuven studies. The failure to replicate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mesotten, Dieter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2592765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18957141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7086
_version_ 1782161575807811584
author Mesotten, Dieter
author_facet Mesotten, Dieter
author_sort Mesotten, Dieter
collection PubMed
description Tight glycaemic control emerged on the scene of critical care in 2001. Surprisingly, not many confirmation trials have been published so far. The randomised controlled trial by De La Rosa and colleagues is a timely and valuable attempt to repeat the landmark Leuven studies. The failure to replicate the beneficial effects of tight glycaemic control may boil down to some less obvious defaults in the set-up of the trial despite a seemingly adequate study design. The incorporation of ample power calculations and strict adherence to glucose targets are essential to fairly compare studies on tight blood glucose control. Only if these basic conditions of study design are fulfilled can the effectiveness of the therapy be assessed.
format Text
id pubmed-2592765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25927652009-10-24 Tight glycaemic control in the intensive care unit: pitfalls in the testing of the concept Mesotten, Dieter Crit Care Commentary Tight glycaemic control emerged on the scene of critical care in 2001. Surprisingly, not many confirmation trials have been published so far. The randomised controlled trial by De La Rosa and colleagues is a timely and valuable attempt to repeat the landmark Leuven studies. The failure to replicate the beneficial effects of tight glycaemic control may boil down to some less obvious defaults in the set-up of the trial despite a seemingly adequate study design. The incorporation of ample power calculations and strict adherence to glucose targets are essential to fairly compare studies on tight blood glucose control. Only if these basic conditions of study design are fulfilled can the effectiveness of the therapy be assessed. BioMed Central 2008 2008-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2592765/ /pubmed/18957141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7086 Text en Copyright © 2008 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Mesotten, Dieter
Tight glycaemic control in the intensive care unit: pitfalls in the testing of the concept
title Tight glycaemic control in the intensive care unit: pitfalls in the testing of the concept
title_full Tight glycaemic control in the intensive care unit: pitfalls in the testing of the concept
title_fullStr Tight glycaemic control in the intensive care unit: pitfalls in the testing of the concept
title_full_unstemmed Tight glycaemic control in the intensive care unit: pitfalls in the testing of the concept
title_short Tight glycaemic control in the intensive care unit: pitfalls in the testing of the concept
title_sort tight glycaemic control in the intensive care unit: pitfalls in the testing of the concept
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2592765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18957141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7086
work_keys_str_mv AT mesottendieter tightglycaemiccontrolintheintensivecareunitpitfallsinthetestingoftheconcept