Cargando…
Validating nutrient-related gene expression changes from microarrays using RT(2) PCR-arrays
Microarray technology allows us to perform high-throughput screening of changes in gene expression. The outcome of microarray experiments largely depends on the applied analysis methods and cut-off values chosen. Results are often required to be verified using a more sensitive detection technique, s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2593020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19034552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12263-008-0094-1 |
_version_ | 1782161605407014912 |
---|---|
author | Gaj, S. Eijssen, L. Mensink, R. P. Evelo, C. T. A. |
author_facet | Gaj, S. Eijssen, L. Mensink, R. P. Evelo, C. T. A. |
author_sort | Gaj, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Microarray technology allows us to perform high-throughput screening of changes in gene expression. The outcome of microarray experiments largely depends on the applied analysis methods and cut-off values chosen. Results are often required to be verified using a more sensitive detection technique, such as quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR or RT-PCR). Throughout the years, this technique has become a de facto golden standard. Individual qPCRs are time-consuming, but the technology to perform high-throughput qPCR reactions has become available through PCR-arrays that allow up to 384 PCR reactions simultaneously. Our current aim was to investigate the usability of a RT(2) Profiler™ PCR-array as validation in a nutritional intervention study, where the measured changes in gene expression were low. For some differentially expressed genes, the PCR-array confirmed the microarray prediction, though not for all. Furthermore, the PCR-array allowed picking up the expression of genes that were not measurable on the microarray platform but also vice versa. We conclude that both techniques have their own (dis)advantages and specificities, and for less pronounced changes using both technologies may be useful as complementation rather than validation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12263-008-0094-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2593020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25930202008-12-16 Validating nutrient-related gene expression changes from microarrays using RT(2) PCR-arrays Gaj, S. Eijssen, L. Mensink, R. P. Evelo, C. T. A. Genes Nutr Research Paper Microarray technology allows us to perform high-throughput screening of changes in gene expression. The outcome of microarray experiments largely depends on the applied analysis methods and cut-off values chosen. Results are often required to be verified using a more sensitive detection technique, such as quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR or RT-PCR). Throughout the years, this technique has become a de facto golden standard. Individual qPCRs are time-consuming, but the technology to perform high-throughput qPCR reactions has become available through PCR-arrays that allow up to 384 PCR reactions simultaneously. Our current aim was to investigate the usability of a RT(2) Profiler™ PCR-array as validation in a nutritional intervention study, where the measured changes in gene expression were low. For some differentially expressed genes, the PCR-array confirmed the microarray prediction, though not for all. Furthermore, the PCR-array allowed picking up the expression of genes that were not measurable on the microarray platform but also vice versa. We conclude that both techniques have their own (dis)advantages and specificities, and for less pronounced changes using both technologies may be useful as complementation rather than validation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12263-008-0094-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2008-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2593020/ /pubmed/19034552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12263-008-0094-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Gaj, S. Eijssen, L. Mensink, R. P. Evelo, C. T. A. Validating nutrient-related gene expression changes from microarrays using RT(2) PCR-arrays |
title | Validating nutrient-related gene expression changes from microarrays using RT(2) PCR-arrays |
title_full | Validating nutrient-related gene expression changes from microarrays using RT(2) PCR-arrays |
title_fullStr | Validating nutrient-related gene expression changes from microarrays using RT(2) PCR-arrays |
title_full_unstemmed | Validating nutrient-related gene expression changes from microarrays using RT(2) PCR-arrays |
title_short | Validating nutrient-related gene expression changes from microarrays using RT(2) PCR-arrays |
title_sort | validating nutrient-related gene expression changes from microarrays using rt(2) pcr-arrays |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2593020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19034552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12263-008-0094-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gajs validatingnutrientrelatedgeneexpressionchangesfrommicroarraysusingrt2pcrarrays AT eijssenl validatingnutrientrelatedgeneexpressionchangesfrommicroarraysusingrt2pcrarrays AT mensinkrp validatingnutrientrelatedgeneexpressionchangesfrommicroarraysusingrt2pcrarrays AT evelocta validatingnutrientrelatedgeneexpressionchangesfrommicroarraysusingrt2pcrarrays |