Cargando…
Technical Brief: Subretinal injection and electroporation into adult mouse eyes
PURPOSE: Our goal was to improve and standardize the procedure for subretinal injection of mouse eyes. Also, we wished to optimize conditions for electroporation of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells in the mouse eye with naked plasmids. METHODS: Mouse eyes were injected subretinally with report...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Vision
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2593752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19057658 |
_version_ | 1782161618773213184 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Christiana J. Berglin, Lennart Chrenek, Micah A. Redmond, T.M. Boatright, Jeffrey H. Nickerson, John M. |
author_facet | Johnson, Christiana J. Berglin, Lennart Chrenek, Micah A. Redmond, T.M. Boatright, Jeffrey H. Nickerson, John M. |
author_sort | Johnson, Christiana J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Our goal was to improve and standardize the procedure for subretinal injection of mouse eyes. Also, we wished to optimize conditions for electroporation of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells in the mouse eye with naked plasmids. METHODS: Mouse eyes were injected subretinally with reporter plasmid DNA, nanobeads, or buffer. A blunt needle was introduced across the cornea, through the pupil, into the vitreous, until it made contact with the neural retina. Gentle pressure was applied to the needle, forcing it to puncture the retina and enter the subretinal space. Fluid was injected subretinally, raising large blebs evident on the mouse fundus. Subretinal injection surgery and outcomes were monitored and evaluated by video recording. Vidisic(R) aided in fundus examination of the blebs. Pores in RPE cells, across which the plasmid in the fluid could diffuse, were created by several short electrical bursts. Expression of the delivered gene, tdTomato, in the plasmid was examined under fluorescence microscopy to identify targeted cells. Electroporation conditions were varied from 0 to 200 V, 5 to 10 pulses, 0.1 ms to 100 ms duration of each pulse, and a space of 1.5 to 2 mm between electrodes on the cornea and sclera. RESULTS: A critical sign of surgical success was the appearance and persistence of three large blebs in the mouse eye. This was illustrated by video recordings from two different systems. Application of Vidisic(R) to the cornea made immediate examination of the fundus possible at the end of the surgery. An 80% success rate was readily achieved by following this method. Once a successful subretinal injection technique was established, electroporation conditions were evaluated. Parameters of 50 V, 1 ms pulse duration, 5–10 pulses, 1 s apart and electrodes spaced 1.5–2 mm apart with the anode placed on the sclera in the vicinity of the blebs produced a tight pattern of RPE transfection at approximately 30% efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized surgical method and a fast distinct indicator of successful surgery were essential to establishing a gene delivery system based on subsequent electroporation. With the surgery better controlled, electroporation was adequate to transfect a substantial number of RPE cells in a defined position in the globe. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2593752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Molecular Vision |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25937522008-12-04 Technical Brief: Subretinal injection and electroporation into adult mouse eyes Johnson, Christiana J. Berglin, Lennart Chrenek, Micah A. Redmond, T.M. Boatright, Jeffrey H. Nickerson, John M. Mol Vis Technical Brief PURPOSE: Our goal was to improve and standardize the procedure for subretinal injection of mouse eyes. Also, we wished to optimize conditions for electroporation of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells in the mouse eye with naked plasmids. METHODS: Mouse eyes were injected subretinally with reporter plasmid DNA, nanobeads, or buffer. A blunt needle was introduced across the cornea, through the pupil, into the vitreous, until it made contact with the neural retina. Gentle pressure was applied to the needle, forcing it to puncture the retina and enter the subretinal space. Fluid was injected subretinally, raising large blebs evident on the mouse fundus. Subretinal injection surgery and outcomes were monitored and evaluated by video recording. Vidisic(R) aided in fundus examination of the blebs. Pores in RPE cells, across which the plasmid in the fluid could diffuse, were created by several short electrical bursts. Expression of the delivered gene, tdTomato, in the plasmid was examined under fluorescence microscopy to identify targeted cells. Electroporation conditions were varied from 0 to 200 V, 5 to 10 pulses, 0.1 ms to 100 ms duration of each pulse, and a space of 1.5 to 2 mm between electrodes on the cornea and sclera. RESULTS: A critical sign of surgical success was the appearance and persistence of three large blebs in the mouse eye. This was illustrated by video recordings from two different systems. Application of Vidisic(R) to the cornea made immediate examination of the fundus possible at the end of the surgery. An 80% success rate was readily achieved by following this method. Once a successful subretinal injection technique was established, electroporation conditions were evaluated. Parameters of 50 V, 1 ms pulse duration, 5–10 pulses, 1 s apart and electrodes spaced 1.5–2 mm apart with the anode placed on the sclera in the vicinity of the blebs produced a tight pattern of RPE transfection at approximately 30% efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized surgical method and a fast distinct indicator of successful surgery were essential to establishing a gene delivery system based on subsequent electroporation. With the surgery better controlled, electroporation was adequate to transfect a substantial number of RPE cells in a defined position in the globe. Molecular Vision 2008-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2593752/ /pubmed/19057658 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Brief Johnson, Christiana J. Berglin, Lennart Chrenek, Micah A. Redmond, T.M. Boatright, Jeffrey H. Nickerson, John M. Technical Brief: Subretinal injection and electroporation into adult mouse eyes |
title | Technical Brief: Subretinal injection and electroporation into adult mouse eyes |
title_full | Technical Brief: Subretinal injection and electroporation into adult mouse eyes |
title_fullStr | Technical Brief: Subretinal injection and electroporation into adult mouse eyes |
title_full_unstemmed | Technical Brief: Subretinal injection and electroporation into adult mouse eyes |
title_short | Technical Brief: Subretinal injection and electroporation into adult mouse eyes |
title_sort | technical brief: subretinal injection and electroporation into adult mouse eyes |
topic | Technical Brief |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2593752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19057658 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonchristianaj technicalbriefsubretinalinjectionandelectroporationintoadultmouseeyes AT berglinlennart technicalbriefsubretinalinjectionandelectroporationintoadultmouseeyes AT chrenekmicaha technicalbriefsubretinalinjectionandelectroporationintoadultmouseeyes AT redmondtm technicalbriefsubretinalinjectionandelectroporationintoadultmouseeyes AT boatrightjeffreyh technicalbriefsubretinalinjectionandelectroporationintoadultmouseeyes AT nickersonjohnm technicalbriefsubretinalinjectionandelectroporationintoadultmouseeyes |