Cargando…

Staging of Lung Cancer

The morphology of the tumor and the anatomic extent of the disease are important factors influencing treatment selection and ultimately survival for patients with lung cancer. The American Joint Committee TNM system provides a method for consistent reproducible description of the primary tumor (T),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mountain, Clifton F.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 1981
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2595954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7293238
_version_ 1782161793611726848
author Mountain, Clifton F.
author_facet Mountain, Clifton F.
author_sort Mountain, Clifton F.
collection PubMed
description The morphology of the tumor and the anatomic extent of the disease are important factors influencing treatment selection and ultimately survival for patients with lung cancer. The American Joint Committee TNM system provides a method for consistent reproducible description of the primary tumor (T), the status of the regional lymph nodes (N), and the presence or absence of distant metastasis (M). The TNM subsets thus classified can be grouped into three “stages” of disease such that the survival expectations for patients in each stage and cell type are similar. This classification of patients with respect to estimates of their prognosis is essential for valid comparisons of treatment modalities and meaningful communication of end results information. Clinical characteristics which influence survival are reflected in the staging recommendations. The size of the lesion, the proximal margination, and the presence or absence of other pulmonary complications are features which distinguish the T classification as T1, T2, or T3. The presence or absence of lymph node involvement has an important bearing on survival expectations. Advancing from no nodal involvement, N0, to involvement of the peribronchial and hilar nodes, N1, and then to the mediastinal nodes, N2, causes progressive erosion in survival expectations. The tumor morphology and specific nodes that are involved are important components of this relationship. The presence of distant metastasis, M1, is synonymous with an extremely poor prognosis. Using these prognostic elements, the TNM subsets are combined into three stages of disease so that patients in each group will have a generally similar life expectancy, the survival for patients with stage I disease being significantly greater than that for patients with stage II disease which is significantly greater than survival for patients with stage III disease. Improvements in the outcome for lung cancer patients depend upon the depth and scope of our scientific understandings and our ability to communicate our observations to one another. Measures of response to treatment can be translated into therapeutic practice only if uniform evaluators are used. Accordingly, a reproducible valid system for staging of lung cancer is recommended.
format Text
id pubmed-2595954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1981
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25959542008-12-05 Staging of Lung Cancer Mountain, Clifton F. Yale J Biol Med Articles The morphology of the tumor and the anatomic extent of the disease are important factors influencing treatment selection and ultimately survival for patients with lung cancer. The American Joint Committee TNM system provides a method for consistent reproducible description of the primary tumor (T), the status of the regional lymph nodes (N), and the presence or absence of distant metastasis (M). The TNM subsets thus classified can be grouped into three “stages” of disease such that the survival expectations for patients in each stage and cell type are similar. This classification of patients with respect to estimates of their prognosis is essential for valid comparisons of treatment modalities and meaningful communication of end results information. Clinical characteristics which influence survival are reflected in the staging recommendations. The size of the lesion, the proximal margination, and the presence or absence of other pulmonary complications are features which distinguish the T classification as T1, T2, or T3. The presence or absence of lymph node involvement has an important bearing on survival expectations. Advancing from no nodal involvement, N0, to involvement of the peribronchial and hilar nodes, N1, and then to the mediastinal nodes, N2, causes progressive erosion in survival expectations. The tumor morphology and specific nodes that are involved are important components of this relationship. The presence of distant metastasis, M1, is synonymous with an extremely poor prognosis. Using these prognostic elements, the TNM subsets are combined into three stages of disease so that patients in each group will have a generally similar life expectancy, the survival for patients with stage I disease being significantly greater than that for patients with stage II disease which is significantly greater than survival for patients with stage III disease. Improvements in the outcome for lung cancer patients depend upon the depth and scope of our scientific understandings and our ability to communicate our observations to one another. Measures of response to treatment can be translated into therapeutic practice only if uniform evaluators are used. Accordingly, a reproducible valid system for staging of lung cancer is recommended. 1981 /pmc/articles/PMC2595954/ /pubmed/7293238 Text en
spellingShingle Articles
Mountain, Clifton F.
Staging of Lung Cancer
title Staging of Lung Cancer
title_full Staging of Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Staging of Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Staging of Lung Cancer
title_short Staging of Lung Cancer
title_sort staging of lung cancer
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2595954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7293238
work_keys_str_mv AT mountaincliftonf stagingoflungcancer