Cargando…

Risk of serious infections during rituximab, abatacept and anakinra treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analyses of randomised placebo-controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Tumour necrosis factor α blockers in rheumatoid arthritis are known to increase the risk of serious infections defined as life-threatening, requiring hospitalisation or intravenous antibiotics. Recently, new biological agents have become available. Their safety is an important issue. PUR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salliot, C, Dougados, M, Gossec, L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2596305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18203761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.083188
_version_ 1782161839011921920
author Salliot, C
Dougados, M
Gossec, L
author_facet Salliot, C
Dougados, M
Gossec, L
author_sort Salliot, C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tumour necrosis factor α blockers in rheumatoid arthritis are known to increase the risk of serious infections defined as life-threatening, requiring hospitalisation or intravenous antibiotics. Recently, new biological agents have become available. Their safety is an important issue. PURPOSE: To assess if biological agents, ie rituximab, abatacept and anakinra increase the risk of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in published randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCE: A systematic review of the literature using PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane library and abstracts databases (American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism annual meetings) was performed up to October 2007. This search was completed with data from the Food and Drug Administration, the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products and manufacturers. DATA EXTRACTION: Three fixed-effect meta-analyses were performed to compare serious infection rates between each biological agent and placebo. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated, using the Mantel–Haenszel method with a continuity correction. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twelve randomised controlled trials with data concerning serious infections were analysed (three for rituximab, five for abatacept and four for anakinra). They included 745 patients, 1960 patients, 2062 patients and 2112 patients treated by rituximab, abatacept, anakinra and placebo respectively. The overall pooled ORs did not reveal a statistically significant increased risk of serious infection for abatacept and rituximab; this risk was increased for high doses of anakinra (⩾100 mg daily) versus low dose and placebo (ORs = 9.63 (95% CI, 1.31 to 70.91) and 3.40 (95% CI, 1.11 to 10.46) respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These meta-analyses did not reveal a significant increase in the risk of serious infections during rituximab or abatacept treatments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; however, high doses of anakinra may increase this risk, especially when patients have comorbidity factors. Large studies must be performed to confirm this safety profile in daily practice.
format Text
id pubmed-2596305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25963052009-01-01 Risk of serious infections during rituximab, abatacept and anakinra treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analyses of randomised placebo-controlled trials Salliot, C Dougados, M Gossec, L Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research BACKGROUND: Tumour necrosis factor α blockers in rheumatoid arthritis are known to increase the risk of serious infections defined as life-threatening, requiring hospitalisation or intravenous antibiotics. Recently, new biological agents have become available. Their safety is an important issue. PURPOSE: To assess if biological agents, ie rituximab, abatacept and anakinra increase the risk of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in published randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCE: A systematic review of the literature using PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane library and abstracts databases (American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism annual meetings) was performed up to October 2007. This search was completed with data from the Food and Drug Administration, the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products and manufacturers. DATA EXTRACTION: Three fixed-effect meta-analyses were performed to compare serious infection rates between each biological agent and placebo. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated, using the Mantel–Haenszel method with a continuity correction. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twelve randomised controlled trials with data concerning serious infections were analysed (three for rituximab, five for abatacept and four for anakinra). They included 745 patients, 1960 patients, 2062 patients and 2112 patients treated by rituximab, abatacept, anakinra and placebo respectively. The overall pooled ORs did not reveal a statistically significant increased risk of serious infection for abatacept and rituximab; this risk was increased for high doses of anakinra (⩾100 mg daily) versus low dose and placebo (ORs = 9.63 (95% CI, 1.31 to 70.91) and 3.40 (95% CI, 1.11 to 10.46) respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These meta-analyses did not reveal a significant increase in the risk of serious infections during rituximab or abatacept treatments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; however, high doses of anakinra may increase this risk, especially when patients have comorbidity factors. Large studies must be performed to confirm this safety profile in daily practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2009-01 2008-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2596305/ /pubmed/18203761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.083188 Text en © Salliot et al 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical and Epidemiological Research
Salliot, C
Dougados, M
Gossec, L
Risk of serious infections during rituximab, abatacept and anakinra treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analyses of randomised placebo-controlled trials
title Risk of serious infections during rituximab, abatacept and anakinra treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analyses of randomised placebo-controlled trials
title_full Risk of serious infections during rituximab, abatacept and anakinra treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analyses of randomised placebo-controlled trials
title_fullStr Risk of serious infections during rituximab, abatacept and anakinra treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analyses of randomised placebo-controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Risk of serious infections during rituximab, abatacept and anakinra treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analyses of randomised placebo-controlled trials
title_short Risk of serious infections during rituximab, abatacept and anakinra treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analyses of randomised placebo-controlled trials
title_sort risk of serious infections during rituximab, abatacept and anakinra treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analyses of randomised placebo-controlled trials
topic Clinical and Epidemiological Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2596305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18203761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.083188
work_keys_str_mv AT salliotc riskofseriousinfectionsduringrituximababataceptandanakinratreatmentsforrheumatoidarthritismetaanalysesofrandomisedplacebocontrolledtrials
AT dougadosm riskofseriousinfectionsduringrituximababataceptandanakinratreatmentsforrheumatoidarthritismetaanalysesofrandomisedplacebocontrolledtrials
AT gossecl riskofseriousinfectionsduringrituximababataceptandanakinratreatmentsforrheumatoidarthritismetaanalysesofrandomisedplacebocontrolledtrials