Cargando…

Rapid diagnostic methods for influenza virus in clinical specimens: a comparative study.

A comparison of five rapid viral diagnostic techniques for identifying influenza virus in nasopharyngeal aspirates has been made on patients with influenza-like illnesses. Initial results with immune electron microscopy were positive in only one of 11 specimens from which virus was isolated and furt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, A. S., Olson, B.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 1982
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2596529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6763813
_version_ 1782161857527676928
author Evans, A. S.
Olson, B.
author_facet Evans, A. S.
Olson, B.
author_sort Evans, A. S.
collection PubMed
description A comparison of five rapid viral diagnostic techniques for identifying influenza virus in nasopharyngeal aspirates has been made on patients with influenza-like illnesses. Initial results with immune electron microscopy were positive in only one of 11 specimens from which virus was isolated and further work abandoned. Four other rapid tests were carried out on 39 specimens from which influenza virus had been isolated in tissue culture in 28. Of these 28 specimens yielding virus, 24 (85.7 percent) were positive by an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) on nasopharyngeal cells; 18 (64.3 percent) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 19 (67.8 percent) by enzyme-linked fluorescent assay (ELFA), and 26 (92.8 percent) by a rapid tissue culture amplification method (TCA) in a continuous Rhesus monkey kidney line (LLC-MK2) with identification of virus by fluorescent antibody. In terms of sensitivity, simplicity, and rapidity, a combination of the IFAT and TCA methods seems to be very useful.
format Text
id pubmed-2596529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1982
publisher Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25965292008-12-05 Rapid diagnostic methods for influenza virus in clinical specimens: a comparative study. Evans, A. S. Olson, B. Yale J Biol Med Research Article A comparison of five rapid viral diagnostic techniques for identifying influenza virus in nasopharyngeal aspirates has been made on patients with influenza-like illnesses. Initial results with immune electron microscopy were positive in only one of 11 specimens from which virus was isolated and further work abandoned. Four other rapid tests were carried out on 39 specimens from which influenza virus had been isolated in tissue culture in 28. Of these 28 specimens yielding virus, 24 (85.7 percent) were positive by an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) on nasopharyngeal cells; 18 (64.3 percent) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 19 (67.8 percent) by enzyme-linked fluorescent assay (ELFA), and 26 (92.8 percent) by a rapid tissue culture amplification method (TCA) in a continuous Rhesus monkey kidney line (LLC-MK2) with identification of virus by fluorescent antibody. In terms of sensitivity, simplicity, and rapidity, a combination of the IFAT and TCA methods seems to be very useful. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 1982 /pmc/articles/PMC2596529/ /pubmed/6763813 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Evans, A. S.
Olson, B.
Rapid diagnostic methods for influenza virus in clinical specimens: a comparative study.
title Rapid diagnostic methods for influenza virus in clinical specimens: a comparative study.
title_full Rapid diagnostic methods for influenza virus in clinical specimens: a comparative study.
title_fullStr Rapid diagnostic methods for influenza virus in clinical specimens: a comparative study.
title_full_unstemmed Rapid diagnostic methods for influenza virus in clinical specimens: a comparative study.
title_short Rapid diagnostic methods for influenza virus in clinical specimens: a comparative study.
title_sort rapid diagnostic methods for influenza virus in clinical specimens: a comparative study.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2596529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6763813
work_keys_str_mv AT evansas rapiddiagnosticmethodsforinfluenzavirusinclinicalspecimensacomparativestudy
AT olsonb rapiddiagnosticmethodsforinfluenzavirusinclinicalspecimensacomparativestudy