Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of State Fish Consumption Advisories Targeting Sensitive Populations

OBJECTIVE: Fish consumption advisories are issued to warn the public of possible toxicological threats from consuming certain fish species. Although developing fetuses and children are particularly susceptible to toxicants in fish, fish also contain valuable nutrients. Hence, formulating advice for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scherer, Alison C., Tsuchiya, Ami, Younglove, Lisa R., Burbacher, Thomas M., Faustman, Elaine M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2599751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19079708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11372
_version_ 1782162098345738240
author Scherer, Alison C.
Tsuchiya, Ami
Younglove, Lisa R.
Burbacher, Thomas M.
Faustman, Elaine M.
author_facet Scherer, Alison C.
Tsuchiya, Ami
Younglove, Lisa R.
Burbacher, Thomas M.
Faustman, Elaine M.
author_sort Scherer, Alison C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Fish consumption advisories are issued to warn the public of possible toxicological threats from consuming certain fish species. Although developing fetuses and children are particularly susceptible to toxicants in fish, fish also contain valuable nutrients. Hence, formulating advice for sensitive populations poses challenges. We conducted a comparative analysis of advisory Web sites issued by states to assess health messages that sensitive populations might access. DATA SOURCES: We evaluated state advisories accessed via the National Listing of Fish Advisories issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. DATA EXTRACTION: We created criteria to evaluate advisory attributes such as risk and benefit message clarity. DATA SYNTHESIS: All 48 state advisories issued at the time of this analysis targeted children, 90% (43) targeted pregnant women, and 58% (28) targeted women of childbearing age. Only six advisories addressed single contaminants, while the remainder based advice on 2–12 contaminants. Results revealed that advisories associated a dozen contaminants with specific adverse health effects. Beneficial health effects of any kind were specifically associated only with omega-3 fatty acids found in fish. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the complexity of assessing and communicating information about multiple contaminant exposure from fish consumption. Communication regarding potential health benefits conferred by specific fish nutrients was minimal and focused primarily on omega-3 fatty acids. This overview suggests some lessons learned and highlights a lack of both clarity and consistency in providing the breadth of information that sensitive populations such as pregnant women need to make public health decisions about fish consumption during pregnancy.
format Text
id pubmed-2599751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25997512008-12-12 Comparative Analysis of State Fish Consumption Advisories Targeting Sensitive Populations Scherer, Alison C. Tsuchiya, Ami Younglove, Lisa R. Burbacher, Thomas M. Faustman, Elaine M. Environ Health Perspect Review OBJECTIVE: Fish consumption advisories are issued to warn the public of possible toxicological threats from consuming certain fish species. Although developing fetuses and children are particularly susceptible to toxicants in fish, fish also contain valuable nutrients. Hence, formulating advice for sensitive populations poses challenges. We conducted a comparative analysis of advisory Web sites issued by states to assess health messages that sensitive populations might access. DATA SOURCES: We evaluated state advisories accessed via the National Listing of Fish Advisories issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. DATA EXTRACTION: We created criteria to evaluate advisory attributes such as risk and benefit message clarity. DATA SYNTHESIS: All 48 state advisories issued at the time of this analysis targeted children, 90% (43) targeted pregnant women, and 58% (28) targeted women of childbearing age. Only six advisories addressed single contaminants, while the remainder based advice on 2–12 contaminants. Results revealed that advisories associated a dozen contaminants with specific adverse health effects. Beneficial health effects of any kind were specifically associated only with omega-3 fatty acids found in fish. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the complexity of assessing and communicating information about multiple contaminant exposure from fish consumption. Communication regarding potential health benefits conferred by specific fish nutrients was minimal and focused primarily on omega-3 fatty acids. This overview suggests some lessons learned and highlights a lack of both clarity and consistency in providing the breadth of information that sensitive populations such as pregnant women need to make public health decisions about fish consumption during pregnancy. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2008-12 2008-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2599751/ /pubmed/19079708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11372 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Review
Scherer, Alison C.
Tsuchiya, Ami
Younglove, Lisa R.
Burbacher, Thomas M.
Faustman, Elaine M.
Comparative Analysis of State Fish Consumption Advisories Targeting Sensitive Populations
title Comparative Analysis of State Fish Consumption Advisories Targeting Sensitive Populations
title_full Comparative Analysis of State Fish Consumption Advisories Targeting Sensitive Populations
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of State Fish Consumption Advisories Targeting Sensitive Populations
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of State Fish Consumption Advisories Targeting Sensitive Populations
title_short Comparative Analysis of State Fish Consumption Advisories Targeting Sensitive Populations
title_sort comparative analysis of state fish consumption advisories targeting sensitive populations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2599751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19079708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11372
work_keys_str_mv AT schereralisonc comparativeanalysisofstatefishconsumptionadvisoriestargetingsensitivepopulations
AT tsuchiyaami comparativeanalysisofstatefishconsumptionadvisoriestargetingsensitivepopulations
AT younglovelisar comparativeanalysisofstatefishconsumptionadvisoriestargetingsensitivepopulations
AT burbacherthomasm comparativeanalysisofstatefishconsumptionadvisoriestargetingsensitivepopulations
AT faustmanelainem comparativeanalysisofstatefishconsumptionadvisoriestargetingsensitivepopulations