Cargando…

Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study

Objectives To evaluate whether happiness can spread from person to person and whether niches of happiness form within social networks. Design Longitudinal social network analysis. Setting Framingham Heart Study social network. Participants 4739 individuals followed from 1983 to 2003. Main outcome me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fowler, James H, Christakis, Nicholas A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2600606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19056788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2338
_version_ 1782162183615938560
author Fowler, James H
Christakis, Nicholas A
author_facet Fowler, James H
Christakis, Nicholas A
author_sort Fowler, James H
collection PubMed
description Objectives To evaluate whether happiness can spread from person to person and whether niches of happiness form within social networks. Design Longitudinal social network analysis. Setting Framingham Heart Study social network. Participants 4739 individuals followed from 1983 to 2003. Main outcome measures Happiness measured with validated four item scale; broad array of attributes of social networks and diverse social ties. Results Clusters of happy and unhappy people are visible in the network, and the relationship between people’s happiness extends up to three degrees of separation (for example, to the friends of one’s friends’ friends). People who are surrounded by many happy people and those who are central in the network are more likely to become happy in the future. Longitudinal statistical models suggest that clusters of happiness result from the spread of happiness and not just a tendency for people to associate with similar individuals. A friend who lives within a mile (about 1.6 km) and who becomes happy increases the probability that a person is happy by 25% (95% confidence interval 1% to 57%). Similar effects are seen in coresident spouses (8%, 0.2% to 16%), siblings who live within a mile (14%, 1% to 28%), and next door neighbours (34%, 7% to 70%). Effects are not seen between coworkers. The effect decays with time and with geographical separation. Conclusions People’s happiness depends on the happiness of others with whom they are connected. This provides further justification for seeing happiness, like health, as a collective phenomenon.
format Text
id pubmed-2600606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26006062009-03-19 Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study Fowler, James H Christakis, Nicholas A BMJ Research Objectives To evaluate whether happiness can spread from person to person and whether niches of happiness form within social networks. Design Longitudinal social network analysis. Setting Framingham Heart Study social network. Participants 4739 individuals followed from 1983 to 2003. Main outcome measures Happiness measured with validated four item scale; broad array of attributes of social networks and diverse social ties. Results Clusters of happy and unhappy people are visible in the network, and the relationship between people’s happiness extends up to three degrees of separation (for example, to the friends of one’s friends’ friends). People who are surrounded by many happy people and those who are central in the network are more likely to become happy in the future. Longitudinal statistical models suggest that clusters of happiness result from the spread of happiness and not just a tendency for people to associate with similar individuals. A friend who lives within a mile (about 1.6 km) and who becomes happy increases the probability that a person is happy by 25% (95% confidence interval 1% to 57%). Similar effects are seen in coresident spouses (8%, 0.2% to 16%), siblings who live within a mile (14%, 1% to 28%), and next door neighbours (34%, 7% to 70%). Effects are not seen between coworkers. The effect decays with time and with geographical separation. Conclusions People’s happiness depends on the happiness of others with whom they are connected. This provides further justification for seeing happiness, like health, as a collective phenomenon. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2008-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2600606/ /pubmed/19056788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2338 Text en © Fowler et al 2008 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Fowler, James H
Christakis, Nicholas A
Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study
title Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study
title_full Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study
title_fullStr Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study
title_short Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study
title_sort dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the framingham heart study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2600606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19056788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2338
work_keys_str_mv AT fowlerjamesh dynamicspreadofhappinessinalargesocialnetworklongitudinalanalysisover20yearsintheframinghamheartstudy
AT christakisnicholasa dynamicspreadofhappinessinalargesocialnetworklongitudinalanalysisover20yearsintheframinghamheartstudy