Cargando…

Clinical use of parnaparin in major and minor orthopedic sugery: a review

Patients undergoing arthroplasty or other orthopedic surgery show a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), involving mortality, morbidity, and social costs; however, the risk for VTE in minor orthopedic surgery should not be underestimated and antithrombotic prophylaxis may be required. Accordin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bugamelli, Stefano, Zangheri, Elena, Montebugnoli, Milena, Guerra, Lucia
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2605328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19183746
_version_ 1782162842227572736
author Bugamelli, Stefano
Zangheri, Elena
Montebugnoli, Milena
Guerra, Lucia
author_facet Bugamelli, Stefano
Zangheri, Elena
Montebugnoli, Milena
Guerra, Lucia
author_sort Bugamelli, Stefano
collection PubMed
description Patients undergoing arthroplasty or other orthopedic surgery show a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), involving mortality, morbidity, and social costs; however, the risk for VTE in minor orthopedic surgery should not be underestimated and antithrombotic prophylaxis may be required. According to the literature, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are more effective in preventing VTE than unfractionated heparins (UFHs) or vitamin K antagonists, and have a lower hemorrhagic risk. By comparing different prophylactic regimens, it has been shown that starting the prophylaxis near the time of the operation is the most critical point for efficacy, whether or not the first dose is administered pre- or post-operatively. Moreover, most thromboembolic complications are observed after discharge and, therefore, many clinicians advocate continuing prophylaxis for longer times (6–8 weeks) in order to further reduce the rate for VTE. The literature on parnaparin, a new LMWH, in VTE prophylaxis was reviewed. Parnaparin is equally effective as UFH, but it offers the advantages of a once-daily administration and improved tolerability, thus allowing the home management of patients with no need for laboratory coagulation tests.
format Text
id pubmed-2605328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26053282009-02-01 Clinical use of parnaparin in major and minor orthopedic sugery: a review Bugamelli, Stefano Zangheri, Elena Montebugnoli, Milena Guerra, Lucia Vasc Health Risk Manag Review Patients undergoing arthroplasty or other orthopedic surgery show a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), involving mortality, morbidity, and social costs; however, the risk for VTE in minor orthopedic surgery should not be underestimated and antithrombotic prophylaxis may be required. According to the literature, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are more effective in preventing VTE than unfractionated heparins (UFHs) or vitamin K antagonists, and have a lower hemorrhagic risk. By comparing different prophylactic regimens, it has been shown that starting the prophylaxis near the time of the operation is the most critical point for efficacy, whether or not the first dose is administered pre- or post-operatively. Moreover, most thromboembolic complications are observed after discharge and, therefore, many clinicians advocate continuing prophylaxis for longer times (6–8 weeks) in order to further reduce the rate for VTE. The literature on parnaparin, a new LMWH, in VTE prophylaxis was reviewed. Parnaparin is equally effective as UFH, but it offers the advantages of a once-daily administration and improved tolerability, thus allowing the home management of patients with no need for laboratory coagulation tests. Dove Medical Press 2008-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2605328/ /pubmed/19183746 Text en © 2008 Dove Medical Press Limited. All rights reserved
spellingShingle Review
Bugamelli, Stefano
Zangheri, Elena
Montebugnoli, Milena
Guerra, Lucia
Clinical use of parnaparin in major and minor orthopedic sugery: a review
title Clinical use of parnaparin in major and minor orthopedic sugery: a review
title_full Clinical use of parnaparin in major and minor orthopedic sugery: a review
title_fullStr Clinical use of parnaparin in major and minor orthopedic sugery: a review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical use of parnaparin in major and minor orthopedic sugery: a review
title_short Clinical use of parnaparin in major and minor orthopedic sugery: a review
title_sort clinical use of parnaparin in major and minor orthopedic sugery: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2605328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19183746
work_keys_str_mv AT bugamellistefano clinicaluseofparnaparininmajorandminororthopedicsugeryareview
AT zangherielena clinicaluseofparnaparininmajorandminororthopedicsugeryareview
AT montebugnolimilena clinicaluseofparnaparininmajorandminororthopedicsugeryareview
AT guerralucia clinicaluseofparnaparininmajorandminororthopedicsugeryareview