Cargando…

Why Is the Correlation between Gene Importance and Gene Evolutionary Rate So Weak?

One of the few commonly believed principles of molecular evolution is that functionally more important genes (or DNA sequences) evolve more slowly than less important ones. This principle is widely used by molecular biologists in daily practice. However, recent genomic analysis of a diverse array of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhi, Zhang, Jianzhi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2605560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19132081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000329
_version_ 1782162863312338944
author Wang, Zhi
Zhang, Jianzhi
author_facet Wang, Zhi
Zhang, Jianzhi
author_sort Wang, Zhi
collection PubMed
description One of the few commonly believed principles of molecular evolution is that functionally more important genes (or DNA sequences) evolve more slowly than less important ones. This principle is widely used by molecular biologists in daily practice. However, recent genomic analysis of a diverse array of organisms found only weak, negative correlations between the evolutionary rate of a gene and its functional importance, typically measured under a single benign lab condition. A frequently suggested cause of the above finding is that gene importance determined in the lab differs from that in an organism's natural environment. Here, we test this hypothesis in yeast using gene importance values experimentally determined in 418 lab conditions or computationally predicted for 10,000 nutritional conditions. In no single condition or combination of conditions did we find a much stronger negative correlation, which is explainable by our subsequent finding that always-essential (enzyme) genes do not evolve significantly more slowly than sometimes-essential or always-nonessential ones. Furthermore, we verified that functional density, approximated by the fraction of amino acid sites within protein domains, is uncorrelated with gene importance. Thus, neither the lab-nature mismatch nor a potentially biased among-gene distribution of functional density explains the observed weakness of the correlation between gene importance and evolutionary rate. We conclude that the weakness is factual, rather than artifactual. In addition to being weakened by population genetic reasons, the correlation is likely to have been further weakened by the presence of multiple nontrivial rate determinants that are independent from gene importance. These findings notwithstanding, we show that the principle of slower evolution of more important genes does have some predictive power when genes with vastly different evolutionary rates are compared, explaining why the principle can be practically useful despite the weakness of the correlation.
format Text
id pubmed-2605560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26055602009-01-09 Why Is the Correlation between Gene Importance and Gene Evolutionary Rate So Weak? Wang, Zhi Zhang, Jianzhi PLoS Genet Research Article One of the few commonly believed principles of molecular evolution is that functionally more important genes (or DNA sequences) evolve more slowly than less important ones. This principle is widely used by molecular biologists in daily practice. However, recent genomic analysis of a diverse array of organisms found only weak, negative correlations between the evolutionary rate of a gene and its functional importance, typically measured under a single benign lab condition. A frequently suggested cause of the above finding is that gene importance determined in the lab differs from that in an organism's natural environment. Here, we test this hypothesis in yeast using gene importance values experimentally determined in 418 lab conditions or computationally predicted for 10,000 nutritional conditions. In no single condition or combination of conditions did we find a much stronger negative correlation, which is explainable by our subsequent finding that always-essential (enzyme) genes do not evolve significantly more slowly than sometimes-essential or always-nonessential ones. Furthermore, we verified that functional density, approximated by the fraction of amino acid sites within protein domains, is uncorrelated with gene importance. Thus, neither the lab-nature mismatch nor a potentially biased among-gene distribution of functional density explains the observed weakness of the correlation between gene importance and evolutionary rate. We conclude that the weakness is factual, rather than artifactual. In addition to being weakened by population genetic reasons, the correlation is likely to have been further weakened by the presence of multiple nontrivial rate determinants that are independent from gene importance. These findings notwithstanding, we show that the principle of slower evolution of more important genes does have some predictive power when genes with vastly different evolutionary rates are compared, explaining why the principle can be practically useful despite the weakness of the correlation. Public Library of Science 2009-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2605560/ /pubmed/19132081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000329 Text en Wang, Zhang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Zhi
Zhang, Jianzhi
Why Is the Correlation between Gene Importance and Gene Evolutionary Rate So Weak?
title Why Is the Correlation between Gene Importance and Gene Evolutionary Rate So Weak?
title_full Why Is the Correlation between Gene Importance and Gene Evolutionary Rate So Weak?
title_fullStr Why Is the Correlation between Gene Importance and Gene Evolutionary Rate So Weak?
title_full_unstemmed Why Is the Correlation between Gene Importance and Gene Evolutionary Rate So Weak?
title_short Why Is the Correlation between Gene Importance and Gene Evolutionary Rate So Weak?
title_sort why is the correlation between gene importance and gene evolutionary rate so weak?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2605560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19132081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000329
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhi whyisthecorrelationbetweengeneimportanceandgeneevolutionaryratesoweak
AT zhangjianzhi whyisthecorrelationbetweengeneimportanceandgeneevolutionaryratesoweak