Cargando…

Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective?

BACKGROUND: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is responsible for 1–2% of all male deaths over the age of 65 years. Early detection of AAA and elective surgery can reduce the mortality risk associated with AAA. However, many patients will not be diagnosed with AAA and have therefore an increas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ehlers, Lars, Sørensen, Jan, Jensen, Lotte Groth, Bech, Merete, Kjølby, Mette
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2607250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19017393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-8-32
_version_ 1782163036077817856
author Ehlers, Lars
Sørensen, Jan
Jensen, Lotte Groth
Bech, Merete
Kjølby, Mette
author_facet Ehlers, Lars
Sørensen, Jan
Jensen, Lotte Groth
Bech, Merete
Kjølby, Mette
author_sort Ehlers, Lars
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is responsible for 1–2% of all male deaths over the age of 65 years. Early detection of AAA and elective surgery can reduce the mortality risk associated with AAA. However, many patients will not be diagnosed with AAA and have therefore an increased death risk due to the untreated AAA. It has been suggested that population screening for AAA in elderly males is effective and cost-effective. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of published cost-effectiveness analyses of screening elderly men for AAA. METHODS: We performed a systematic search for economic evaluations in NHSEED, EconLit, Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Cinahl and two Scandinavian HTA data bases (DACEHTA and SBU). All identified studies were read in full and each study was systematically assessed according to international guidelines for critical assessment of economic evaluations in health care. RESULTS: The search identified 16 cost-effectiveness studies. Most studies considered only short term cost consequences. The studies seemed to employ a number of "optimistic" assumptions in favour of AAA screening, and included only few sensitivity analyses that assessed less optimistic assumptions. CONCLUSION: Further analyses of cost-effectiveness of AAA screening are recommended.
format Text
id pubmed-2607250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26072502008-12-24 Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective? Ehlers, Lars Sørensen, Jan Jensen, Lotte Groth Bech, Merete Kjølby, Mette BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is responsible for 1–2% of all male deaths over the age of 65 years. Early detection of AAA and elective surgery can reduce the mortality risk associated with AAA. However, many patients will not be diagnosed with AAA and have therefore an increased death risk due to the untreated AAA. It has been suggested that population screening for AAA in elderly males is effective and cost-effective. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of published cost-effectiveness analyses of screening elderly men for AAA. METHODS: We performed a systematic search for economic evaluations in NHSEED, EconLit, Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Cinahl and two Scandinavian HTA data bases (DACEHTA and SBU). All identified studies were read in full and each study was systematically assessed according to international guidelines for critical assessment of economic evaluations in health care. RESULTS: The search identified 16 cost-effectiveness studies. Most studies considered only short term cost consequences. The studies seemed to employ a number of "optimistic" assumptions in favour of AAA screening, and included only few sensitivity analyses that assessed less optimistic assumptions. CONCLUSION: Further analyses of cost-effectiveness of AAA screening are recommended. BioMed Central 2008-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2607250/ /pubmed/19017393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-8-32 Text en Copyright © 2008 Ehlers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ehlers, Lars
Sørensen, Jan
Jensen, Lotte Groth
Bech, Merete
Kjølby, Mette
Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective?
title Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective?
title_full Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective?
title_fullStr Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective?
title_full_unstemmed Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective?
title_short Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective?
title_sort is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2607250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19017393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-8-32
work_keys_str_mv AT ehlerslars ispopulationscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysmcosteffective
AT sørensenjan ispopulationscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysmcosteffective
AT jensenlottegroth ispopulationscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysmcosteffective
AT bechmerete ispopulationscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysmcosteffective
AT kjølbymette ispopulationscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysmcosteffective