Cargando…
Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective?
BACKGROUND: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is responsible for 1–2% of all male deaths over the age of 65 years. Early detection of AAA and elective surgery can reduce the mortality risk associated with AAA. However, many patients will not be diagnosed with AAA and have therefore an increas...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2607250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19017393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-8-32 |
_version_ | 1782163036077817856 |
---|---|
author | Ehlers, Lars Sørensen, Jan Jensen, Lotte Groth Bech, Merete Kjølby, Mette |
author_facet | Ehlers, Lars Sørensen, Jan Jensen, Lotte Groth Bech, Merete Kjølby, Mette |
author_sort | Ehlers, Lars |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is responsible for 1–2% of all male deaths over the age of 65 years. Early detection of AAA and elective surgery can reduce the mortality risk associated with AAA. However, many patients will not be diagnosed with AAA and have therefore an increased death risk due to the untreated AAA. It has been suggested that population screening for AAA in elderly males is effective and cost-effective. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of published cost-effectiveness analyses of screening elderly men for AAA. METHODS: We performed a systematic search for economic evaluations in NHSEED, EconLit, Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Cinahl and two Scandinavian HTA data bases (DACEHTA and SBU). All identified studies were read in full and each study was systematically assessed according to international guidelines for critical assessment of economic evaluations in health care. RESULTS: The search identified 16 cost-effectiveness studies. Most studies considered only short term cost consequences. The studies seemed to employ a number of "optimistic" assumptions in favour of AAA screening, and included only few sensitivity analyses that assessed less optimistic assumptions. CONCLUSION: Further analyses of cost-effectiveness of AAA screening are recommended. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2607250 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26072502008-12-24 Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective? Ehlers, Lars Sørensen, Jan Jensen, Lotte Groth Bech, Merete Kjølby, Mette BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is responsible for 1–2% of all male deaths over the age of 65 years. Early detection of AAA and elective surgery can reduce the mortality risk associated with AAA. However, many patients will not be diagnosed with AAA and have therefore an increased death risk due to the untreated AAA. It has been suggested that population screening for AAA in elderly males is effective and cost-effective. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of published cost-effectiveness analyses of screening elderly men for AAA. METHODS: We performed a systematic search for economic evaluations in NHSEED, EconLit, Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Cinahl and two Scandinavian HTA data bases (DACEHTA and SBU). All identified studies were read in full and each study was systematically assessed according to international guidelines for critical assessment of economic evaluations in health care. RESULTS: The search identified 16 cost-effectiveness studies. Most studies considered only short term cost consequences. The studies seemed to employ a number of "optimistic" assumptions in favour of AAA screening, and included only few sensitivity analyses that assessed less optimistic assumptions. CONCLUSION: Further analyses of cost-effectiveness of AAA screening are recommended. BioMed Central 2008-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2607250/ /pubmed/19017393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-8-32 Text en Copyright © 2008 Ehlers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ehlers, Lars Sørensen, Jan Jensen, Lotte Groth Bech, Merete Kjølby, Mette Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective? |
title | Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective? |
title_full | Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective? |
title_fullStr | Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective? |
title_short | Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective? |
title_sort | is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2607250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19017393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-8-32 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ehlerslars ispopulationscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysmcosteffective AT sørensenjan ispopulationscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysmcosteffective AT jensenlottegroth ispopulationscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysmcosteffective AT bechmerete ispopulationscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysmcosteffective AT kjølbymette ispopulationscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysmcosteffective |