Automatic Outbreak Detection Algorithm versus Electronic Reporting System

To determine efficacy of automatic outbreak detection algorithms (AODAs), we analyzed 3,582 AODA signals and 4,427 reports of outbreaks caused by Campylobacter spp. or norovirus during 2005–2006 in Germany. Local health departments reported local outbreaks with higher sensitivity and positive predic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Straetemans, Masja, Altmann, Doris, Eckmanns, Tim, Krause, Gérard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2008
Materias:
Dispatch
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2609880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18826826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1410.071354
_version_ 1782163065097158656
author Straetemans, Masja
Altmann, Doris
Eckmanns, Tim
Krause, Gérard
author_facet Straetemans, Masja
Altmann, Doris
Eckmanns, Tim
Krause, Gérard
author_sort Straetemans, Masja
collection PubMed
description To determine efficacy of automatic outbreak detection algorithms (AODAs), we analyzed 3,582 AODA signals and 4,427 reports of outbreaks caused by Campylobacter spp. or norovirus during 2005–2006 in Germany. Local health departments reported local outbreaks with higher sensitivity and positive predictive value than did AODAs.
format Text
id pubmed-2609880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26098802009-01-13 Automatic Outbreak Detection Algorithm versus Electronic Reporting System Straetemans, Masja Altmann, Doris Eckmanns, Tim Krause, Gérard Emerg Infect Dis Dispatch To determine efficacy of automatic outbreak detection algorithms (AODAs), we analyzed 3,582 AODA signals and 4,427 reports of outbreaks caused by Campylobacter spp. or norovirus during 2005–2006 in Germany. Local health departments reported local outbreaks with higher sensitivity and positive predictive value than did AODAs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2008-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2609880/ /pubmed/18826826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1410.071354 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Dispatch
Straetemans, Masja
Altmann, Doris
Eckmanns, Tim
Krause, Gérard
Automatic Outbreak Detection Algorithm versus Electronic Reporting System
title Automatic Outbreak Detection Algorithm versus Electronic Reporting System
title_full Automatic Outbreak Detection Algorithm versus Electronic Reporting System
title_fullStr Automatic Outbreak Detection Algorithm versus Electronic Reporting System
title_full_unstemmed Automatic Outbreak Detection Algorithm versus Electronic Reporting System
title_short Automatic Outbreak Detection Algorithm versus Electronic Reporting System
title_sort automatic outbreak detection algorithm versus electronic reporting system
topic Dispatch
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2609880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18826826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1410.071354
work_keys_str_mv AT straetemansmasja automaticoutbreakdetectionalgorithmversuselectronicreportingsystem
AT altmanndoris automaticoutbreakdetectionalgorithmversuselectronicreportingsystem
AT eckmannstim automaticoutbreakdetectionalgorithmversuselectronicreportingsystem
AT krausegerard automaticoutbreakdetectionalgorithmversuselectronicreportingsystem

Ejemplares similares