Cargando…
VAST: Vertebral Artery Stenting Trial. Protocol for a randomised safety and feasibility trial
BACKGROUND: Twenty to 30 percent of all transient ischaemic attacks and ischaemic strokes involve tissue supplied by the vertebrobasilar circulation. Atherosclerotic stenosis ≥ 50% in the vertebral artery accounts for vertebrobasilar stroke in at least one third of the patients. The risk of recurren...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2611963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19025615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-65 |
_version_ | 1782163103389057024 |
---|---|
author | Compter, A van der Worp, HB Schonewille, WJ Vos, JA Algra, A Lo, TH Mali, WPThM Moll, FL Kappelle, LJ |
author_facet | Compter, A van der Worp, HB Schonewille, WJ Vos, JA Algra, A Lo, TH Mali, WPThM Moll, FL Kappelle, LJ |
author_sort | Compter, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Twenty to 30 percent of all transient ischaemic attacks and ischaemic strokes involve tissue supplied by the vertebrobasilar circulation. Atherosclerotic stenosis ≥ 50% in the vertebral artery accounts for vertebrobasilar stroke in at least one third of the patients. The risk of recurrent vascular events in patients with vertebral stenosis is uncertain and revascularisation of vertebral stenosis is rarely performed. Observational studies have suggested that the risk of subsequent stroke or death in patients with vertebrobasilar ischaemic events is comparable with that in patients with carotid territory events. Treatment of vertebral stenosis by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty has been introduced as an attractive treatment option. The safety and benefit of stenting of symptomatic vertebral stenosis as compared with best medical therapy alone remains to be elucidated in a randomised clinical trial. STUDY OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the Vertebral Artery Stenting Trial (VAST) is to assess whether stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis ≥ 50% is feasible and safe. A secondary aim is to assess the rate of new vascular events in the territory of the vertebrobasilar arteries in patients with symptomatic vertebral stenosis ≥ 50% on best medical therapy with or without stenting. DESIGN: This is a randomised, open clinical trial, comparing best medical treatment with or without vertebral artery stenting in patients with recently symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis ≥ 50%. The trial will include a total of 180 patients with transient ischaemic attack or non-disabling ischaemic stroke attributed to vertebral artery stenosis ≥ 50%. The primary outcome is any stroke, vascular death, or non-fatal myocardial infarction within 30 days after start of treatment. Secondary outcome measures include any stroke or vascular death during follow-up and the degree of (re)stenosis after one year. DISCUSSION: Improvements both in imaging of the vertebral artery and in endovascular techniques have created new opportunities for the treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis. This trial will assess the feasibility and safety of stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis and will provide sufficient data to inform a conclusive randomised trial testing the benefit of this treatment strategy. The VAST is supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation (2007B045; ISRCTN29597900). |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2611963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26119632008-12-30 VAST: Vertebral Artery Stenting Trial. Protocol for a randomised safety and feasibility trial Compter, A van der Worp, HB Schonewille, WJ Vos, JA Algra, A Lo, TH Mali, WPThM Moll, FL Kappelle, LJ Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Twenty to 30 percent of all transient ischaemic attacks and ischaemic strokes involve tissue supplied by the vertebrobasilar circulation. Atherosclerotic stenosis ≥ 50% in the vertebral artery accounts for vertebrobasilar stroke in at least one third of the patients. The risk of recurrent vascular events in patients with vertebral stenosis is uncertain and revascularisation of vertebral stenosis is rarely performed. Observational studies have suggested that the risk of subsequent stroke or death in patients with vertebrobasilar ischaemic events is comparable with that in patients with carotid territory events. Treatment of vertebral stenosis by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty has been introduced as an attractive treatment option. The safety and benefit of stenting of symptomatic vertebral stenosis as compared with best medical therapy alone remains to be elucidated in a randomised clinical trial. STUDY OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the Vertebral Artery Stenting Trial (VAST) is to assess whether stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis ≥ 50% is feasible and safe. A secondary aim is to assess the rate of new vascular events in the territory of the vertebrobasilar arteries in patients with symptomatic vertebral stenosis ≥ 50% on best medical therapy with or without stenting. DESIGN: This is a randomised, open clinical trial, comparing best medical treatment with or without vertebral artery stenting in patients with recently symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis ≥ 50%. The trial will include a total of 180 patients with transient ischaemic attack or non-disabling ischaemic stroke attributed to vertebral artery stenosis ≥ 50%. The primary outcome is any stroke, vascular death, or non-fatal myocardial infarction within 30 days after start of treatment. Secondary outcome measures include any stroke or vascular death during follow-up and the degree of (re)stenosis after one year. DISCUSSION: Improvements both in imaging of the vertebral artery and in endovascular techniques have created new opportunities for the treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis. This trial will assess the feasibility and safety of stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis and will provide sufficient data to inform a conclusive randomised trial testing the benefit of this treatment strategy. The VAST is supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation (2007B045; ISRCTN29597900). BioMed Central 2008-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2611963/ /pubmed/19025615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-65 Text en Copyright © 2008 Compter et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Compter, A van der Worp, HB Schonewille, WJ Vos, JA Algra, A Lo, TH Mali, WPThM Moll, FL Kappelle, LJ VAST: Vertebral Artery Stenting Trial. Protocol for a randomised safety and feasibility trial |
title | VAST: Vertebral Artery Stenting Trial. Protocol for a randomised safety and feasibility trial |
title_full | VAST: Vertebral Artery Stenting Trial. Protocol for a randomised safety and feasibility trial |
title_fullStr | VAST: Vertebral Artery Stenting Trial. Protocol for a randomised safety and feasibility trial |
title_full_unstemmed | VAST: Vertebral Artery Stenting Trial. Protocol for a randomised safety and feasibility trial |
title_short | VAST: Vertebral Artery Stenting Trial. Protocol for a randomised safety and feasibility trial |
title_sort | vast: vertebral artery stenting trial. protocol for a randomised safety and feasibility trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2611963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19025615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-65 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT comptera vastvertebralarterystentingtrialprotocolforarandomisedsafetyandfeasibilitytrial AT vanderworphb vastvertebralarterystentingtrialprotocolforarandomisedsafetyandfeasibilitytrial AT schonewillewj vastvertebralarterystentingtrialprotocolforarandomisedsafetyandfeasibilitytrial AT vosja vastvertebralarterystentingtrialprotocolforarandomisedsafetyandfeasibilitytrial AT algraa vastvertebralarterystentingtrialprotocolforarandomisedsafetyandfeasibilitytrial AT loth vastvertebralarterystentingtrialprotocolforarandomisedsafetyandfeasibilitytrial AT maliwpthm vastvertebralarterystentingtrialprotocolforarandomisedsafetyandfeasibilitytrial AT mollfl vastvertebralarterystentingtrialprotocolforarandomisedsafetyandfeasibilitytrial AT kappellelj vastvertebralarterystentingtrialprotocolforarandomisedsafetyandfeasibilitytrial |