Cargando…
Prognostic factors of survival time after hematopoietic stem cell transplant in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: Cox proportional hazard versus accelerated failure time models
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) after haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients using accelerated failure time (AFT), Cox proportional hazard (PH), and Cox time-varying coefficient model...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2611969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19025609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-27-74 |
_version_ | 1782163104813023232 |
---|---|
author | Sayehmiri, Kourosh Eshraghian, Mohammad R Mohammad, Kazem Alimoghaddam, Kamran Foroushani, Abbas Rahimi Zeraati, Hojjat Golestan, Banafsheh Ghavamzadeh, Ardeshir |
author_facet | Sayehmiri, Kourosh Eshraghian, Mohammad R Mohammad, Kazem Alimoghaddam, Kamran Foroushani, Abbas Rahimi Zeraati, Hojjat Golestan, Banafsheh Ghavamzadeh, Ardeshir |
author_sort | Sayehmiri, Kourosh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) after haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients using accelerated failure time (AFT), Cox proportional hazard (PH), and Cox time-varying coefficient models. METHODS: 206 patients were enrolled after HSCH in Shariati Hospital between 1993 and 2007. There was evidence of marked departures from the proportional hazards assumption with two prognostic factors, relapse and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) (P < .001). Performance among AFT and Cox's models was assessed using explained variation and goodness of fit methods. Discrimination among the exponential, Weibull, generalized gamma (GG), log-logistic, and lognormal distributions was done using maximum likelihood and Akaike information criteria. RESULTS: The 5-year OS was 52% (95%CI: 47.3–56.7). Peak mortality hazard occurred at months 6–7 after HSCT followed by a decreasing trend. In univariate analysis, the data was better fitted by GG distribution than by other distributions. Univariate analysis using GG distribution showed a positive association between OS with acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (P = .021), no relapse (P < .001), cGVHD (P < .001), neutrophil recovery (P < .001) and platelet recovery (P < .001). Based on Cox PH models; however cGVHD and relapse were the predictive factors of OS (P < .001). Multivariate analysis indicated that, OS is related to relapse (P < .001) and platelet recovery (P = .037), where predictive power of Weibull AFT models was superior to Cox PH model and Cox with time-varying coefficient (R(2 )= 0.46 for AFT, R(2 )= .21 for Cox PH and R(2 )= .34 for Cox time-varying coefficient). Cox-Snell residual shows Weibull AFT fitted to data better than other distributions in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: We concluded that AFT distributions can be a useful tool for recognizing prognostic factors of OS in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2611969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26119692008-12-30 Prognostic factors of survival time after hematopoietic stem cell transplant in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: Cox proportional hazard versus accelerated failure time models Sayehmiri, Kourosh Eshraghian, Mohammad R Mohammad, Kazem Alimoghaddam, Kamran Foroushani, Abbas Rahimi Zeraati, Hojjat Golestan, Banafsheh Ghavamzadeh, Ardeshir J Exp Clin Cancer Res Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) after haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients using accelerated failure time (AFT), Cox proportional hazard (PH), and Cox time-varying coefficient models. METHODS: 206 patients were enrolled after HSCH in Shariati Hospital between 1993 and 2007. There was evidence of marked departures from the proportional hazards assumption with two prognostic factors, relapse and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) (P < .001). Performance among AFT and Cox's models was assessed using explained variation and goodness of fit methods. Discrimination among the exponential, Weibull, generalized gamma (GG), log-logistic, and lognormal distributions was done using maximum likelihood and Akaike information criteria. RESULTS: The 5-year OS was 52% (95%CI: 47.3–56.7). Peak mortality hazard occurred at months 6–7 after HSCT followed by a decreasing trend. In univariate analysis, the data was better fitted by GG distribution than by other distributions. Univariate analysis using GG distribution showed a positive association between OS with acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (P = .021), no relapse (P < .001), cGVHD (P < .001), neutrophil recovery (P < .001) and platelet recovery (P < .001). Based on Cox PH models; however cGVHD and relapse were the predictive factors of OS (P < .001). Multivariate analysis indicated that, OS is related to relapse (P < .001) and platelet recovery (P = .037), where predictive power of Weibull AFT models was superior to Cox PH model and Cox with time-varying coefficient (R(2 )= 0.46 for AFT, R(2 )= .21 for Cox PH and R(2 )= .34 for Cox time-varying coefficient). Cox-Snell residual shows Weibull AFT fitted to data better than other distributions in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: We concluded that AFT distributions can be a useful tool for recognizing prognostic factors of OS in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. BioMed Central 2008-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2611969/ /pubmed/19025609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-27-74 Text en Copyright © 2008 Sayehmiri et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Sayehmiri, Kourosh Eshraghian, Mohammad R Mohammad, Kazem Alimoghaddam, Kamran Foroushani, Abbas Rahimi Zeraati, Hojjat Golestan, Banafsheh Ghavamzadeh, Ardeshir Prognostic factors of survival time after hematopoietic stem cell transplant in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: Cox proportional hazard versus accelerated failure time models |
title | Prognostic factors of survival time after hematopoietic stem cell transplant in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: Cox proportional hazard versus accelerated failure time models |
title_full | Prognostic factors of survival time after hematopoietic stem cell transplant in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: Cox proportional hazard versus accelerated failure time models |
title_fullStr | Prognostic factors of survival time after hematopoietic stem cell transplant in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: Cox proportional hazard versus accelerated failure time models |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic factors of survival time after hematopoietic stem cell transplant in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: Cox proportional hazard versus accelerated failure time models |
title_short | Prognostic factors of survival time after hematopoietic stem cell transplant in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: Cox proportional hazard versus accelerated failure time models |
title_sort | prognostic factors of survival time after hematopoietic stem cell transplant in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: cox proportional hazard versus accelerated failure time models |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2611969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19025609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-27-74 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sayehmirikourosh prognosticfactorsofsurvivaltimeafterhematopoieticstemcelltransplantinacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientscoxproportionalhazardversusacceleratedfailuretimemodels AT eshraghianmohammadr prognosticfactorsofsurvivaltimeafterhematopoieticstemcelltransplantinacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientscoxproportionalhazardversusacceleratedfailuretimemodels AT mohammadkazem prognosticfactorsofsurvivaltimeafterhematopoieticstemcelltransplantinacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientscoxproportionalhazardversusacceleratedfailuretimemodels AT alimoghaddamkamran prognosticfactorsofsurvivaltimeafterhematopoieticstemcelltransplantinacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientscoxproportionalhazardversusacceleratedfailuretimemodels AT foroushaniabbasrahimi prognosticfactorsofsurvivaltimeafterhematopoieticstemcelltransplantinacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientscoxproportionalhazardversusacceleratedfailuretimemodels AT zeraatihojjat prognosticfactorsofsurvivaltimeafterhematopoieticstemcelltransplantinacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientscoxproportionalhazardversusacceleratedfailuretimemodels AT golestanbanafsheh prognosticfactorsofsurvivaltimeafterhematopoieticstemcelltransplantinacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientscoxproportionalhazardversusacceleratedfailuretimemodels AT ghavamzadehardeshir prognosticfactorsofsurvivaltimeafterhematopoieticstemcelltransplantinacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientscoxproportionalhazardversusacceleratedfailuretimemodels |