Cargando…

Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study evaluated the capability of different soft drinks (Coca-Cola®-C, Coca-Cola Light®-CL, Guaraná®-G, Pepsi Twist®-P and Sprite Light®-SL) to erode dental enamel, relating the percentage of superficial microhardness change (%SMHC) to concentrations of fluoride and phospha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Carvalho Sales-Peres, Sílvia Helena, Magalhães, Ana Carolina, de Andrade Moreira Machado, Maria Aparecida, Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Investigations Society 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2612950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19212490
_version_ 1782163143962656768
author de Carvalho Sales-Peres, Sílvia Helena
Magalhães, Ana Carolina
de Andrade Moreira Machado, Maria Aparecida
Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo
author_facet de Carvalho Sales-Peres, Sílvia Helena
Magalhães, Ana Carolina
de Andrade Moreira Machado, Maria Aparecida
Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo
author_sort de Carvalho Sales-Peres, Sílvia Helena
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study evaluated the capability of different soft drinks (Coca-Cola®-C, Coca-Cola Light®-CL, Guaraná®-G, Pepsi Twist®-P and Sprite Light®-SL) to erode dental enamel, relating the percentage of superficial microhardness change (%SMHC) to concentrations of fluoride and phosphate, buffering capacity and pH of these drinks. METHODS: The soft drinks were evaluated in respect to concentration of phosphate and fluoride spectrophotometrically using Fiske, Subarrow method and by specific electrode (Orion 9609), respectively. The pH and the buffering capacity were determined by glass electrode and by estimating of the volume of NaOH necessary to change the pH of the drink in one unit, respectively. One hundred specimens of bovine enamel were randomly assigned to 5 groups of 20 each. They were exposed to 4 cycles of demineralisation in the beverage and remineralisation in artificial saliva. The softening of enamel was evaluated by %SMHC. RESULTS: The mean %SMHC was: C=77.27%, CL= 72.45%, SL=78.43%, G=66.65% and P=67.95%. Comparing the %SMHC promoted by 5 soft drinks, SL = C > CL > P = G (P<.05). There was not significant correlation between %SMHC and the other variables tested for the five drinks (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The five soft drinks caused surface softening of enamel (erosion). In respect to the chemical variables tested, despite not statistically significant, the pH seems to have more influence on the erosive potential of these drinks. (Eur J Dent 2007;1:10–13)
format Text
id pubmed-2612950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Dental Investigations Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26129502009-02-11 Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks de Carvalho Sales-Peres, Sílvia Helena Magalhães, Ana Carolina de Andrade Moreira Machado, Maria Aparecida Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo Eur J Dent Original Articles OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study evaluated the capability of different soft drinks (Coca-Cola®-C, Coca-Cola Light®-CL, Guaraná®-G, Pepsi Twist®-P and Sprite Light®-SL) to erode dental enamel, relating the percentage of superficial microhardness change (%SMHC) to concentrations of fluoride and phosphate, buffering capacity and pH of these drinks. METHODS: The soft drinks were evaluated in respect to concentration of phosphate and fluoride spectrophotometrically using Fiske, Subarrow method and by specific electrode (Orion 9609), respectively. The pH and the buffering capacity were determined by glass electrode and by estimating of the volume of NaOH necessary to change the pH of the drink in one unit, respectively. One hundred specimens of bovine enamel were randomly assigned to 5 groups of 20 each. They were exposed to 4 cycles of demineralisation in the beverage and remineralisation in artificial saliva. The softening of enamel was evaluated by %SMHC. RESULTS: The mean %SMHC was: C=77.27%, CL= 72.45%, SL=78.43%, G=66.65% and P=67.95%. Comparing the %SMHC promoted by 5 soft drinks, SL = C > CL > P = G (P<.05). There was not significant correlation between %SMHC and the other variables tested for the five drinks (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The five soft drinks caused surface softening of enamel (erosion). In respect to the chemical variables tested, despite not statistically significant, the pH seems to have more influence on the erosive potential of these drinks. (Eur J Dent 2007;1:10–13) Dental Investigations Society 2007-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2612950/ /pubmed/19212490 Text en Copyright 2007 European Journal of Dentistry. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Original Articles
de Carvalho Sales-Peres, Sílvia Helena
Magalhães, Ana Carolina
de Andrade Moreira Machado, Maria Aparecida
Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo
Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks
title Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks
title_full Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks
title_fullStr Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks
title_short Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks
title_sort evaluation of the erosive potential of soft drinks
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2612950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19212490
work_keys_str_mv AT decarvalhosalesperessilviahelena evaluationoftheerosivepotentialofsoftdrinks
AT magalhaesanacarolina evaluationoftheerosivepotentialofsoftdrinks
AT deandrademoreiramachadomariaaparecida evaluationoftheerosivepotentialofsoftdrinks
AT buzalafmariliaafonsorabelo evaluationoftheerosivepotentialofsoftdrinks