Cargando…
Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks
OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study evaluated the capability of different soft drinks (Coca-Cola®-C, Coca-Cola Light®-CL, Guaraná®-G, Pepsi Twist®-P and Sprite Light®-SL) to erode dental enamel, relating the percentage of superficial microhardness change (%SMHC) to concentrations of fluoride and phospha...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Investigations Society
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2612950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19212490 |
_version_ | 1782163143962656768 |
---|---|
author | de Carvalho Sales-Peres, Sílvia Helena Magalhães, Ana Carolina de Andrade Moreira Machado, Maria Aparecida Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo |
author_facet | de Carvalho Sales-Peres, Sílvia Helena Magalhães, Ana Carolina de Andrade Moreira Machado, Maria Aparecida Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo |
author_sort | de Carvalho Sales-Peres, Sílvia Helena |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study evaluated the capability of different soft drinks (Coca-Cola®-C, Coca-Cola Light®-CL, Guaraná®-G, Pepsi Twist®-P and Sprite Light®-SL) to erode dental enamel, relating the percentage of superficial microhardness change (%SMHC) to concentrations of fluoride and phosphate, buffering capacity and pH of these drinks. METHODS: The soft drinks were evaluated in respect to concentration of phosphate and fluoride spectrophotometrically using Fiske, Subarrow method and by specific electrode (Orion 9609), respectively. The pH and the buffering capacity were determined by glass electrode and by estimating of the volume of NaOH necessary to change the pH of the drink in one unit, respectively. One hundred specimens of bovine enamel were randomly assigned to 5 groups of 20 each. They were exposed to 4 cycles of demineralisation in the beverage and remineralisation in artificial saliva. The softening of enamel was evaluated by %SMHC. RESULTS: The mean %SMHC was: C=77.27%, CL= 72.45%, SL=78.43%, G=66.65% and P=67.95%. Comparing the %SMHC promoted by 5 soft drinks, SL = C > CL > P = G (P<.05). There was not significant correlation between %SMHC and the other variables tested for the five drinks (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The five soft drinks caused surface softening of enamel (erosion). In respect to the chemical variables tested, despite not statistically significant, the pH seems to have more influence on the erosive potential of these drinks. (Eur J Dent 2007;1:10–13) |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2612950 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Dental Investigations Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26129502009-02-11 Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks de Carvalho Sales-Peres, Sílvia Helena Magalhães, Ana Carolina de Andrade Moreira Machado, Maria Aparecida Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo Eur J Dent Original Articles OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study evaluated the capability of different soft drinks (Coca-Cola®-C, Coca-Cola Light®-CL, Guaraná®-G, Pepsi Twist®-P and Sprite Light®-SL) to erode dental enamel, relating the percentage of superficial microhardness change (%SMHC) to concentrations of fluoride and phosphate, buffering capacity and pH of these drinks. METHODS: The soft drinks were evaluated in respect to concentration of phosphate and fluoride spectrophotometrically using Fiske, Subarrow method and by specific electrode (Orion 9609), respectively. The pH and the buffering capacity were determined by glass electrode and by estimating of the volume of NaOH necessary to change the pH of the drink in one unit, respectively. One hundred specimens of bovine enamel were randomly assigned to 5 groups of 20 each. They were exposed to 4 cycles of demineralisation in the beverage and remineralisation in artificial saliva. The softening of enamel was evaluated by %SMHC. RESULTS: The mean %SMHC was: C=77.27%, CL= 72.45%, SL=78.43%, G=66.65% and P=67.95%. Comparing the %SMHC promoted by 5 soft drinks, SL = C > CL > P = G (P<.05). There was not significant correlation between %SMHC and the other variables tested for the five drinks (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The five soft drinks caused surface softening of enamel (erosion). In respect to the chemical variables tested, despite not statistically significant, the pH seems to have more influence on the erosive potential of these drinks. (Eur J Dent 2007;1:10–13) Dental Investigations Society 2007-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2612950/ /pubmed/19212490 Text en Copyright 2007 European Journal of Dentistry. All rights reserved. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles de Carvalho Sales-Peres, Sílvia Helena Magalhães, Ana Carolina de Andrade Moreira Machado, Maria Aparecida Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks |
title | Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks |
title_full | Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks |
title_short | Evaluation of The Erosive Potential of Soft Drinks |
title_sort | evaluation of the erosive potential of soft drinks |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2612950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19212490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT decarvalhosalesperessilviahelena evaluationoftheerosivepotentialofsoftdrinks AT magalhaesanacarolina evaluationoftheerosivepotentialofsoftdrinks AT deandrademoreiramachadomariaaparecida evaluationoftheerosivepotentialofsoftdrinks AT buzalafmariliaafonsorabelo evaluationoftheerosivepotentialofsoftdrinks |