Cargando…

Relative receptor affinity comparisons among inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids: perspectives on clinical relevance

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic properties, dosing regimen, and potency at the site of action are among the factors that influence activity of a corticosteroid. The potency of a corticosteroid at the site of action is determined significantly by its affinity to the glucocorticoid receptor. Recent litera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hochhaus, Günther
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2613397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19025651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-9-75
_version_ 1782163175996653568
author Hochhaus, Günther
author_facet Hochhaus, Günther
author_sort Hochhaus, Günther
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic properties, dosing regimen, and potency at the site of action are among the factors that influence activity of a corticosteroid. The potency of a corticosteroid at the site of action is determined significantly by its affinity to the glucocorticoid receptor. Recent literature on topical corticosteroids reveals an increasing emphasis on comparative relative receptor affinity values as a key method of differentiating among various corticosteroid compounds, particularly with regard to clinical efficacy. METHODS: A response was formulated to: Valotis A, Högger P: Human receptor kinetics and lung tissue retention of the enhanced-affinity glucocorticoid fluticasone furoate. Respir Res 2007, 8:54. RESULTS: Relative receptor binding affinities, while often showing significant variability across different laboratories, are a valid parameter when a comparison of the pharmacological activity of various glucocorticoids at the site of action is desired. Unfortunately within this context, scientific literature including the article from Valotis and Högger, confuse differences in potency (concentration or dose necessary to achieve a certain effect) with differences in efficacy (a quantitative difference in the overall maximum effect, even if all the receptors are occupied). All glucocorticoids will show the same efficacy as long as the selected dose will occupy the same number of receptors. CONCLUSION: While relative receptor affinities are useful for comparing in vitro potencies of corticosteroids, these data are not representative of physiologic conditions and should not be used as a basis for comparing the presumed effectiveness of compounds in a clinical situation.
format Text
id pubmed-2613397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26133972009-01-03 Relative receptor affinity comparisons among inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids: perspectives on clinical relevance Hochhaus, Günther Respir Res Letter to the Editor BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic properties, dosing regimen, and potency at the site of action are among the factors that influence activity of a corticosteroid. The potency of a corticosteroid at the site of action is determined significantly by its affinity to the glucocorticoid receptor. Recent literature on topical corticosteroids reveals an increasing emphasis on comparative relative receptor affinity values as a key method of differentiating among various corticosteroid compounds, particularly with regard to clinical efficacy. METHODS: A response was formulated to: Valotis A, Högger P: Human receptor kinetics and lung tissue retention of the enhanced-affinity glucocorticoid fluticasone furoate. Respir Res 2007, 8:54. RESULTS: Relative receptor binding affinities, while often showing significant variability across different laboratories, are a valid parameter when a comparison of the pharmacological activity of various glucocorticoids at the site of action is desired. Unfortunately within this context, scientific literature including the article from Valotis and Högger, confuse differences in potency (concentration or dose necessary to achieve a certain effect) with differences in efficacy (a quantitative difference in the overall maximum effect, even if all the receptors are occupied). All glucocorticoids will show the same efficacy as long as the selected dose will occupy the same number of receptors. CONCLUSION: While relative receptor affinities are useful for comparing in vitro potencies of corticosteroids, these data are not representative of physiologic conditions and should not be used as a basis for comparing the presumed effectiveness of compounds in a clinical situation. BioMed Central 2008 2008-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2613397/ /pubmed/19025651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-9-75 Text en Copyright © 2008 Hochhaus; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letter to the Editor
Hochhaus, Günther
Relative receptor affinity comparisons among inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids: perspectives on clinical relevance
title Relative receptor affinity comparisons among inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids: perspectives on clinical relevance
title_full Relative receptor affinity comparisons among inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids: perspectives on clinical relevance
title_fullStr Relative receptor affinity comparisons among inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids: perspectives on clinical relevance
title_full_unstemmed Relative receptor affinity comparisons among inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids: perspectives on clinical relevance
title_short Relative receptor affinity comparisons among inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids: perspectives on clinical relevance
title_sort relative receptor affinity comparisons among inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids: perspectives on clinical relevance
topic Letter to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2613397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19025651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-9-75
work_keys_str_mv AT hochhausgunther relativereceptoraffinitycomparisonsamonginhaledintranasalcorticosteroidsperspectivesonclinicalrelevance