Cargando…

Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005

BACKGROUND: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) may assist in diagnosis, improve prescribing practices and reduce potential drug resistance development. Without understanding operational issues or acceptance and usage by providers and patients, the costs of these tests may not be justified. OBJECT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Holly Ann, Causer, Louise, Metta, Emmy, Malila, Aggrey, O'Reilly, Terrence, Abdulla, Salim, Kachur, S Patrick, Bloland, Peter B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2613413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19019233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-239
_version_ 1782163179573346304
author Williams, Holly Ann
Causer, Louise
Metta, Emmy
Malila, Aggrey
O'Reilly, Terrence
Abdulla, Salim
Kachur, S Patrick
Bloland, Peter B
author_facet Williams, Holly Ann
Causer, Louise
Metta, Emmy
Malila, Aggrey
O'Reilly, Terrence
Abdulla, Salim
Kachur, S Patrick
Bloland, Peter B
author_sort Williams, Holly Ann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) may assist in diagnosis, improve prescribing practices and reduce potential drug resistance development. Without understanding operational issues or acceptance and usage by providers and patients, the costs of these tests may not be justified. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of RDTs on prescribing behaviours, assess prescribers' and patients' perceptions, and identify operational issues during implementation. METHODS: Baseline data were collected at six Tanzanian public dispensaries. RDTs were implemented for eight weeks and data collected on frequency of RDT use, results, malaria diagnoses and the prescription of antimalarials. Patients referred for RDTs completed a standardised exit interview. Qualitative methods assessed attitudes toward and satisfaction with RDTs, perceptions about the test and operational issues related to implementation. RESULTS: Of 595 patients at baseline, 200 (33%) were diagnosed clinically with malaria but had a negative RDT. Among the 2519 RDTs performed during implementation, 289 (11.5%) had a negative result and antimalarials prescribed. The proportion of "over-prescriptions" at baseline was 54.8% (198/365). At weeks four and eight this decreased to 16.1% (27/168) and 16.4% (42/256) respectively. A total of 355 patient or parent/caregiver and 21 prescriber individual interviews and 12 focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted. Patients, caregivers and providers trusted RDT results, agreed that use of RDTs was feasible at dispensary level, and perceived that RDTs improved clinical diagnosis. Negative concerns included community suspicion and fear that RDTs were HIV tests, the need for additional supervision in interpreting the results, and increased work loads without added compensation. CONCLUSION: Overprescriptions decreased over the study period. There was a high degree of patient/caregiver and provider acceptance of and satisfaction with RDTs. Implementation should include community education, sufficient levels of training and supervision and consideration of the need for additional staff.
format Text
id pubmed-2613413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26134132009-01-03 Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005 Williams, Holly Ann Causer, Louise Metta, Emmy Malila, Aggrey O'Reilly, Terrence Abdulla, Salim Kachur, S Patrick Bloland, Peter B Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) may assist in diagnosis, improve prescribing practices and reduce potential drug resistance development. Without understanding operational issues or acceptance and usage by providers and patients, the costs of these tests may not be justified. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of RDTs on prescribing behaviours, assess prescribers' and patients' perceptions, and identify operational issues during implementation. METHODS: Baseline data were collected at six Tanzanian public dispensaries. RDTs were implemented for eight weeks and data collected on frequency of RDT use, results, malaria diagnoses and the prescription of antimalarials. Patients referred for RDTs completed a standardised exit interview. Qualitative methods assessed attitudes toward and satisfaction with RDTs, perceptions about the test and operational issues related to implementation. RESULTS: Of 595 patients at baseline, 200 (33%) were diagnosed clinically with malaria but had a negative RDT. Among the 2519 RDTs performed during implementation, 289 (11.5%) had a negative result and antimalarials prescribed. The proportion of "over-prescriptions" at baseline was 54.8% (198/365). At weeks four and eight this decreased to 16.1% (27/168) and 16.4% (42/256) respectively. A total of 355 patient or parent/caregiver and 21 prescriber individual interviews and 12 focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted. Patients, caregivers and providers trusted RDT results, agreed that use of RDTs was feasible at dispensary level, and perceived that RDTs improved clinical diagnosis. Negative concerns included community suspicion and fear that RDTs were HIV tests, the need for additional supervision in interpreting the results, and increased work loads without added compensation. CONCLUSION: Overprescriptions decreased over the study period. There was a high degree of patient/caregiver and provider acceptance of and satisfaction with RDTs. Implementation should include community education, sufficient levels of training and supervision and consideration of the need for additional staff. BioMed Central 2008-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2613413/ /pubmed/19019233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-239 Text en Copyright © 2008 Williams et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Williams, Holly Ann
Causer, Louise
Metta, Emmy
Malila, Aggrey
O'Reilly, Terrence
Abdulla, Salim
Kachur, S Patrick
Bloland, Peter B
Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005
title Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005
title_full Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005
title_fullStr Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005
title_full_unstemmed Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005
title_short Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005
title_sort dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of rdt acceptance and usage by providers and patients – tanzania, 2005
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2613413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19019233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-239
work_keys_str_mv AT williamshollyann dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005
AT causerlouise dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005
AT mettaemmy dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005
AT malilaaggrey dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005
AT oreillyterrence dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005
AT abdullasalim dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005
AT kachurspatrick dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005
AT blolandpeterb dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005