Cargando…
Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005
BACKGROUND: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) may assist in diagnosis, improve prescribing practices and reduce potential drug resistance development. Without understanding operational issues or acceptance and usage by providers and patients, the costs of these tests may not be justified. OBJECT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2613413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19019233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-239 |
_version_ | 1782163179573346304 |
---|---|
author | Williams, Holly Ann Causer, Louise Metta, Emmy Malila, Aggrey O'Reilly, Terrence Abdulla, Salim Kachur, S Patrick Bloland, Peter B |
author_facet | Williams, Holly Ann Causer, Louise Metta, Emmy Malila, Aggrey O'Reilly, Terrence Abdulla, Salim Kachur, S Patrick Bloland, Peter B |
author_sort | Williams, Holly Ann |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) may assist in diagnosis, improve prescribing practices and reduce potential drug resistance development. Without understanding operational issues or acceptance and usage by providers and patients, the costs of these tests may not be justified. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of RDTs on prescribing behaviours, assess prescribers' and patients' perceptions, and identify operational issues during implementation. METHODS: Baseline data were collected at six Tanzanian public dispensaries. RDTs were implemented for eight weeks and data collected on frequency of RDT use, results, malaria diagnoses and the prescription of antimalarials. Patients referred for RDTs completed a standardised exit interview. Qualitative methods assessed attitudes toward and satisfaction with RDTs, perceptions about the test and operational issues related to implementation. RESULTS: Of 595 patients at baseline, 200 (33%) were diagnosed clinically with malaria but had a negative RDT. Among the 2519 RDTs performed during implementation, 289 (11.5%) had a negative result and antimalarials prescribed. The proportion of "over-prescriptions" at baseline was 54.8% (198/365). At weeks four and eight this decreased to 16.1% (27/168) and 16.4% (42/256) respectively. A total of 355 patient or parent/caregiver and 21 prescriber individual interviews and 12 focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted. Patients, caregivers and providers trusted RDT results, agreed that use of RDTs was feasible at dispensary level, and perceived that RDTs improved clinical diagnosis. Negative concerns included community suspicion and fear that RDTs were HIV tests, the need for additional supervision in interpreting the results, and increased work loads without added compensation. CONCLUSION: Overprescriptions decreased over the study period. There was a high degree of patient/caregiver and provider acceptance of and satisfaction with RDTs. Implementation should include community education, sufficient levels of training and supervision and consideration of the need for additional staff. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2613413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26134132009-01-03 Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005 Williams, Holly Ann Causer, Louise Metta, Emmy Malila, Aggrey O'Reilly, Terrence Abdulla, Salim Kachur, S Patrick Bloland, Peter B Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) may assist in diagnosis, improve prescribing practices and reduce potential drug resistance development. Without understanding operational issues or acceptance and usage by providers and patients, the costs of these tests may not be justified. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of RDTs on prescribing behaviours, assess prescribers' and patients' perceptions, and identify operational issues during implementation. METHODS: Baseline data were collected at six Tanzanian public dispensaries. RDTs were implemented for eight weeks and data collected on frequency of RDT use, results, malaria diagnoses and the prescription of antimalarials. Patients referred for RDTs completed a standardised exit interview. Qualitative methods assessed attitudes toward and satisfaction with RDTs, perceptions about the test and operational issues related to implementation. RESULTS: Of 595 patients at baseline, 200 (33%) were diagnosed clinically with malaria but had a negative RDT. Among the 2519 RDTs performed during implementation, 289 (11.5%) had a negative result and antimalarials prescribed. The proportion of "over-prescriptions" at baseline was 54.8% (198/365). At weeks four and eight this decreased to 16.1% (27/168) and 16.4% (42/256) respectively. A total of 355 patient or parent/caregiver and 21 prescriber individual interviews and 12 focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted. Patients, caregivers and providers trusted RDT results, agreed that use of RDTs was feasible at dispensary level, and perceived that RDTs improved clinical diagnosis. Negative concerns included community suspicion and fear that RDTs were HIV tests, the need for additional supervision in interpreting the results, and increased work loads without added compensation. CONCLUSION: Overprescriptions decreased over the study period. There was a high degree of patient/caregiver and provider acceptance of and satisfaction with RDTs. Implementation should include community education, sufficient levels of training and supervision and consideration of the need for additional staff. BioMed Central 2008-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2613413/ /pubmed/19019233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-239 Text en Copyright © 2008 Williams et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Williams, Holly Ann Causer, Louise Metta, Emmy Malila, Aggrey O'Reilly, Terrence Abdulla, Salim Kachur, S Patrick Bloland, Peter B Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005 |
title | Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005 |
title_full | Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005 |
title_fullStr | Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005 |
title_full_unstemmed | Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005 |
title_short | Dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of RDT acceptance and usage by providers and patients – Tanzania, 2005 |
title_sort | dispensary level pilot implementation of rapid diagnostic tests: an evaluation of rdt acceptance and usage by providers and patients – tanzania, 2005 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2613413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19019233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-239 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamshollyann dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005 AT causerlouise dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005 AT mettaemmy dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005 AT malilaaggrey dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005 AT oreillyterrence dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005 AT abdullasalim dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005 AT kachurspatrick dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005 AT blolandpeterb dispensarylevelpilotimplementationofrapiddiagnostictestsanevaluationofrdtacceptanceandusagebyprovidersandpatientstanzania2005 |