Cargando…
Relationship between Expression of the Family of M Proteins and Lipoteichoic Acid to Hydrophobicity and Biofilm Formation in Streptococcus pyogenes
BACKGROUND: Hydrophobicity is an important attribute of bacteria that contributes to adhesion and biofilm formation. Hydrophobicity of Streptococcus pyogenes is primarily due to lipoteichoic acid (LTA) on the streptococcal surface but the mechanism(s) whereby LTA is retained on the surface is poorly...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2613554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19132104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004166 |
_version_ | 1782163194087735296 |
---|---|
author | Courtney, Harry S. Ofek, Itzhak Penfound, Thomas Nizet, Victor Pence, Morgan A. Kreikemeyer, Bernd Podbielbski, Andreas Hasty, David L. Dale, James B. |
author_facet | Courtney, Harry S. Ofek, Itzhak Penfound, Thomas Nizet, Victor Pence, Morgan A. Kreikemeyer, Bernd Podbielbski, Andreas Hasty, David L. Dale, James B. |
author_sort | Courtney, Harry S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hydrophobicity is an important attribute of bacteria that contributes to adhesion and biofilm formation. Hydrophobicity of Streptococcus pyogenes is primarily due to lipoteichoic acid (LTA) on the streptococcal surface but the mechanism(s) whereby LTA is retained on the surface is poorly understood. In this study, we sought to determine whether members of the M protein family consisting of Emm (M protein), Mrp (M-related protein), Enn (an M-like protein), and the streptococcal protective antigen (Spa) are involved in anchoring LTA in a manner that contributes to hydrophobicity of the streptococci and its ability to form biofilms. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Isogenic mutants defective in expression of emm, mrp, enn, and/or spa genes of eight different serotypes and their parental strains were tested for differences in LTA bound to surface proteins, LTA released into the culture media, and membrane-bound LTA. The effect of these mutations on the ability of streptococci to form a hydrophobic surface and to generate biofilms was also investigated. A recombinant strain overexpressing Emm1 was also engineered and similarly tested. The serotypes tested ranged from those that express only a single M protein gene to those that express two or three members of the M protein family. Overexpression of Emm1 led to enhanced hydrophobicity and biofilm formation. Inactivation of emm in those serotypes expressing only a single emm gene reduced biofilm formation, and protein-bound LTA on the surface, but did not alter the levels of membrane-bound LTA. The results were more varied in those serotypes that express two to three members of the M protein family. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that the formation of complexes with members of the M protein family is a common mechanism for anchoring LTA on the surface in a manner that contributes to hydrophobicity and to biofilm formation in S. pyogenes, but these activities in some serotypes are dependent on a trypsin-sensitive protein(s) that remains to be identified. The need for interactions between LTA and M proteins may impose functional constraints that limit variations in the sequence of the M proteins, major virulence factors of S. pyogenes. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2613554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26135542009-01-09 Relationship between Expression of the Family of M Proteins and Lipoteichoic Acid to Hydrophobicity and Biofilm Formation in Streptococcus pyogenes Courtney, Harry S. Ofek, Itzhak Penfound, Thomas Nizet, Victor Pence, Morgan A. Kreikemeyer, Bernd Podbielbski, Andreas Hasty, David L. Dale, James B. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Hydrophobicity is an important attribute of bacteria that contributes to adhesion and biofilm formation. Hydrophobicity of Streptococcus pyogenes is primarily due to lipoteichoic acid (LTA) on the streptococcal surface but the mechanism(s) whereby LTA is retained on the surface is poorly understood. In this study, we sought to determine whether members of the M protein family consisting of Emm (M protein), Mrp (M-related protein), Enn (an M-like protein), and the streptococcal protective antigen (Spa) are involved in anchoring LTA in a manner that contributes to hydrophobicity of the streptococci and its ability to form biofilms. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Isogenic mutants defective in expression of emm, mrp, enn, and/or spa genes of eight different serotypes and their parental strains were tested for differences in LTA bound to surface proteins, LTA released into the culture media, and membrane-bound LTA. The effect of these mutations on the ability of streptococci to form a hydrophobic surface and to generate biofilms was also investigated. A recombinant strain overexpressing Emm1 was also engineered and similarly tested. The serotypes tested ranged from those that express only a single M protein gene to those that express two or three members of the M protein family. Overexpression of Emm1 led to enhanced hydrophobicity and biofilm formation. Inactivation of emm in those serotypes expressing only a single emm gene reduced biofilm formation, and protein-bound LTA on the surface, but did not alter the levels of membrane-bound LTA. The results were more varied in those serotypes that express two to three members of the M protein family. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that the formation of complexes with members of the M protein family is a common mechanism for anchoring LTA on the surface in a manner that contributes to hydrophobicity and to biofilm formation in S. pyogenes, but these activities in some serotypes are dependent on a trypsin-sensitive protein(s) that remains to be identified. The need for interactions between LTA and M proteins may impose functional constraints that limit variations in the sequence of the M proteins, major virulence factors of S. pyogenes. Public Library of Science 2009-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2613554/ /pubmed/19132104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004166 Text en Courtney et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Courtney, Harry S. Ofek, Itzhak Penfound, Thomas Nizet, Victor Pence, Morgan A. Kreikemeyer, Bernd Podbielbski, Andreas Hasty, David L. Dale, James B. Relationship between Expression of the Family of M Proteins and Lipoteichoic Acid to Hydrophobicity and Biofilm Formation in Streptococcus pyogenes |
title | Relationship between Expression of the Family of M Proteins and Lipoteichoic Acid to Hydrophobicity and Biofilm Formation in Streptococcus pyogenes
|
title_full | Relationship between Expression of the Family of M Proteins and Lipoteichoic Acid to Hydrophobicity and Biofilm Formation in Streptococcus pyogenes
|
title_fullStr | Relationship between Expression of the Family of M Proteins and Lipoteichoic Acid to Hydrophobicity and Biofilm Formation in Streptococcus pyogenes
|
title_full_unstemmed | Relationship between Expression of the Family of M Proteins and Lipoteichoic Acid to Hydrophobicity and Biofilm Formation in Streptococcus pyogenes
|
title_short | Relationship between Expression of the Family of M Proteins and Lipoteichoic Acid to Hydrophobicity and Biofilm Formation in Streptococcus pyogenes
|
title_sort | relationship between expression of the family of m proteins and lipoteichoic acid to hydrophobicity and biofilm formation in streptococcus pyogenes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2613554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19132104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004166 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT courtneyharrys relationshipbetweenexpressionofthefamilyofmproteinsandlipoteichoicacidtohydrophobicityandbiofilmformationinstreptococcuspyogenes AT ofekitzhak relationshipbetweenexpressionofthefamilyofmproteinsandlipoteichoicacidtohydrophobicityandbiofilmformationinstreptococcuspyogenes AT penfoundthomas relationshipbetweenexpressionofthefamilyofmproteinsandlipoteichoicacidtohydrophobicityandbiofilmformationinstreptococcuspyogenes AT nizetvictor relationshipbetweenexpressionofthefamilyofmproteinsandlipoteichoicacidtohydrophobicityandbiofilmformationinstreptococcuspyogenes AT pencemorgana relationshipbetweenexpressionofthefamilyofmproteinsandlipoteichoicacidtohydrophobicityandbiofilmformationinstreptococcuspyogenes AT kreikemeyerbernd relationshipbetweenexpressionofthefamilyofmproteinsandlipoteichoicacidtohydrophobicityandbiofilmformationinstreptococcuspyogenes AT podbielbskiandreas relationshipbetweenexpressionofthefamilyofmproteinsandlipoteichoicacidtohydrophobicityandbiofilmformationinstreptococcuspyogenes AT hastydavidl relationshipbetweenexpressionofthefamilyofmproteinsandlipoteichoicacidtohydrophobicityandbiofilmformationinstreptococcuspyogenes AT dalejamesb relationshipbetweenexpressionofthefamilyofmproteinsandlipoteichoicacidtohydrophobicityandbiofilmformationinstreptococcuspyogenes |