Cargando…

Use of anthropometric indicators in screening for undiagnosed vertebral fractures: A cross-sectional analysis of the Fukui Osteoporosis Cohort (FOC) study

BACKGROUND: Vertebral fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. Although often asymptomatic, each vertebral fracture increases the risk of additional fractures. Development of a safe and simple screening method is necessary to identify individuals with asymptomatic vertebral fract...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abe, Kiyoko, Tamaki, Junko, Kadowaki, Eiko, Sato, Yuho, Morita, Akemi, Komatsu, Misa, Takeuchi, Sayaka, Kajita, Etsuko, Iki, Masayuki
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2613887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19032794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-157
_version_ 1782163205005508608
author Abe, Kiyoko
Tamaki, Junko
Kadowaki, Eiko
Sato, Yuho
Morita, Akemi
Komatsu, Misa
Takeuchi, Sayaka
Kajita, Etsuko
Iki, Masayuki
author_facet Abe, Kiyoko
Tamaki, Junko
Kadowaki, Eiko
Sato, Yuho
Morita, Akemi
Komatsu, Misa
Takeuchi, Sayaka
Kajita, Etsuko
Iki, Masayuki
author_sort Abe, Kiyoko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vertebral fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. Although often asymptomatic, each vertebral fracture increases the risk of additional fractures. Development of a safe and simple screening method is necessary to identify individuals with asymptomatic vertebral fractures. METHODS: Lateral imaging of the spine by single energy X-ray absorptiometry and vertebral morphometry were conducted in 116 Japanese women (mean age: 69.9 ± 9.3 yr). Vertebral deformities were diagnosed by the McCloskey-Kanis criteria and were used as a proxy for vertebral fractures. We evaluated whether anthropometric parameters including arm span-height difference (AHD), wall-occiput distance (WOD), and rib-pelvis distance (RPD) were related to vertebral deformities. Positive findings were defined for AHD as ≥ 4.0 cm, for WOD as ≥ 5 mm, and for RPD as ≤ two fingerbreadths. Receiver operating characteristics curves analysis was performed, and cut-off values were determined to give maximum difference between sensitivity and false-positive rate. Expected probabilities for vertebral deformities were calculated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean AHD for those participants with and without vertebral deformities were 7.0 ± 4.1 cm and 4.2 ± 4.2 cm (p < 0.01), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for use of AHD-positive, WOD-positive and RPD-positive values in predicting vertebral deformities were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.69, 1.01) and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.62); 0.70 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.90) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.76); and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.87) and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.69), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio for a positive result (LR) for use of combined AHD-positive and WOD-positive values were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.44, 0.86), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.89), and 3.47 (95% CI: 3.01, 3.99), respectively. The expected probability of vertebral deformities (P) was obtained by the equation; P = 1-(exp [-1.327-0.040 × body weight +1.332 × WOD-positive + 1.623 × AHD-positive])(-1). The sensitivity, specificity and LR for use of a 0.306 cut-off value for probability of vertebral fractures were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.44, 0.86), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.93), and 4.82 (95% CI: 4.00, 5.77), respectively. CONCLUSION: Both WOD and AHD effectively predicted vertebral deformities. This screening method could be used in a strategy to prevent additional vertebral fractures, even when X-ray technology is not available.
format Text
id pubmed-2613887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26138872009-01-06 Use of anthropometric indicators in screening for undiagnosed vertebral fractures: A cross-sectional analysis of the Fukui Osteoporosis Cohort (FOC) study Abe, Kiyoko Tamaki, Junko Kadowaki, Eiko Sato, Yuho Morita, Akemi Komatsu, Misa Takeuchi, Sayaka Kajita, Etsuko Iki, Masayuki BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Vertebral fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. Although often asymptomatic, each vertebral fracture increases the risk of additional fractures. Development of a safe and simple screening method is necessary to identify individuals with asymptomatic vertebral fractures. METHODS: Lateral imaging of the spine by single energy X-ray absorptiometry and vertebral morphometry were conducted in 116 Japanese women (mean age: 69.9 ± 9.3 yr). Vertebral deformities were diagnosed by the McCloskey-Kanis criteria and were used as a proxy for vertebral fractures. We evaluated whether anthropometric parameters including arm span-height difference (AHD), wall-occiput distance (WOD), and rib-pelvis distance (RPD) were related to vertebral deformities. Positive findings were defined for AHD as ≥ 4.0 cm, for WOD as ≥ 5 mm, and for RPD as ≤ two fingerbreadths. Receiver operating characteristics curves analysis was performed, and cut-off values were determined to give maximum difference between sensitivity and false-positive rate. Expected probabilities for vertebral deformities were calculated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean AHD for those participants with and without vertebral deformities were 7.0 ± 4.1 cm and 4.2 ± 4.2 cm (p < 0.01), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for use of AHD-positive, WOD-positive and RPD-positive values in predicting vertebral deformities were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.69, 1.01) and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.62); 0.70 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.90) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.76); and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.87) and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.69), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio for a positive result (LR) for use of combined AHD-positive and WOD-positive values were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.44, 0.86), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.89), and 3.47 (95% CI: 3.01, 3.99), respectively. The expected probability of vertebral deformities (P) was obtained by the equation; P = 1-(exp [-1.327-0.040 × body weight +1.332 × WOD-positive + 1.623 × AHD-positive])(-1). The sensitivity, specificity and LR for use of a 0.306 cut-off value for probability of vertebral fractures were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.44, 0.86), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.93), and 4.82 (95% CI: 4.00, 5.77), respectively. CONCLUSION: Both WOD and AHD effectively predicted vertebral deformities. This screening method could be used in a strategy to prevent additional vertebral fractures, even when X-ray technology is not available. BioMed Central 2008-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2613887/ /pubmed/19032794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-157 Text en Copyright © 2008 Abe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abe, Kiyoko
Tamaki, Junko
Kadowaki, Eiko
Sato, Yuho
Morita, Akemi
Komatsu, Misa
Takeuchi, Sayaka
Kajita, Etsuko
Iki, Masayuki
Use of anthropometric indicators in screening for undiagnosed vertebral fractures: A cross-sectional analysis of the Fukui Osteoporosis Cohort (FOC) study
title Use of anthropometric indicators in screening for undiagnosed vertebral fractures: A cross-sectional analysis of the Fukui Osteoporosis Cohort (FOC) study
title_full Use of anthropometric indicators in screening for undiagnosed vertebral fractures: A cross-sectional analysis of the Fukui Osteoporosis Cohort (FOC) study
title_fullStr Use of anthropometric indicators in screening for undiagnosed vertebral fractures: A cross-sectional analysis of the Fukui Osteoporosis Cohort (FOC) study
title_full_unstemmed Use of anthropometric indicators in screening for undiagnosed vertebral fractures: A cross-sectional analysis of the Fukui Osteoporosis Cohort (FOC) study
title_short Use of anthropometric indicators in screening for undiagnosed vertebral fractures: A cross-sectional analysis of the Fukui Osteoporosis Cohort (FOC) study
title_sort use of anthropometric indicators in screening for undiagnosed vertebral fractures: a cross-sectional analysis of the fukui osteoporosis cohort (foc) study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2613887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19032794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-157
work_keys_str_mv AT abekiyoko useofanthropometricindicatorsinscreeningforundiagnosedvertebralfracturesacrosssectionalanalysisofthefukuiosteoporosiscohortfocstudy
AT tamakijunko useofanthropometricindicatorsinscreeningforundiagnosedvertebralfracturesacrosssectionalanalysisofthefukuiosteoporosiscohortfocstudy
AT kadowakieiko useofanthropometricindicatorsinscreeningforundiagnosedvertebralfracturesacrosssectionalanalysisofthefukuiosteoporosiscohortfocstudy
AT satoyuho useofanthropometricindicatorsinscreeningforundiagnosedvertebralfracturesacrosssectionalanalysisofthefukuiosteoporosiscohortfocstudy
AT moritaakemi useofanthropometricindicatorsinscreeningforundiagnosedvertebralfracturesacrosssectionalanalysisofthefukuiosteoporosiscohortfocstudy
AT komatsumisa useofanthropometricindicatorsinscreeningforundiagnosedvertebralfracturesacrosssectionalanalysisofthefukuiosteoporosiscohortfocstudy
AT takeuchisayaka useofanthropometricindicatorsinscreeningforundiagnosedvertebralfracturesacrosssectionalanalysisofthefukuiosteoporosiscohortfocstudy
AT kajitaetsuko useofanthropometricindicatorsinscreeningforundiagnosedvertebralfracturesacrosssectionalanalysisofthefukuiosteoporosiscohortfocstudy
AT ikimasayuki useofanthropometricindicatorsinscreeningforundiagnosedvertebralfracturesacrosssectionalanalysisofthefukuiosteoporosiscohortfocstudy