Cargando…

Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record

The problem of intermediates in the fossil record has been frequently discussed ever since Darwin. The extent of ‘gaps’ (missing transitional stages) has been used to argue against gradual evolution from a common ancestor. Traditionally, gaps have often been explained by the improbability of fossili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Mareike, Steel, Mike
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2614194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19204808
_version_ 1782163220851589120
author Fischer, Mareike
Steel, Mike
author_facet Fischer, Mareike
Steel, Mike
author_sort Fischer, Mareike
collection PubMed
description The problem of intermediates in the fossil record has been frequently discussed ever since Darwin. The extent of ‘gaps’ (missing transitional stages) has been used to argue against gradual evolution from a common ancestor. Traditionally, gaps have often been explained by the improbability of fossilization and the discontinuous selection of found fossils. Here we take an analytical approach and demonstrate why, under certain sampling conditions, we may not expect intermediates to be found. Using a simple null model, we show mathematically that the question of whether a taxon sampled from some time in the past is likely to be morphologically intermediate to other samples (dated earlier and later) depends on the shape and dimensions of the underlying phylogenetic tree that connects the taxa, and the times from which the fossils are sampled.
format Text
id pubmed-2614194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26141942009-02-09 Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record Fischer, Mareike Steel, Mike Evol Bioinform Online Original Research The problem of intermediates in the fossil record has been frequently discussed ever since Darwin. The extent of ‘gaps’ (missing transitional stages) has been used to argue against gradual evolution from a common ancestor. Traditionally, gaps have often been explained by the improbability of fossilization and the discontinuous selection of found fossils. Here we take an analytical approach and demonstrate why, under certain sampling conditions, we may not expect intermediates to be found. Using a simple null model, we show mathematically that the question of whether a taxon sampled from some time in the past is likely to be morphologically intermediate to other samples (dated earlier and later) depends on the shape and dimensions of the underlying phylogenetic tree that connects the taxa, and the times from which the fossils are sampled. Libertas Academica 2008-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2614194/ /pubmed/19204808 Text en Copyright © 2008 The authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution By licence. For further information go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)
spellingShingle Original Research
Fischer, Mareike
Steel, Mike
Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record
title Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record
title_full Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record
title_fullStr Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record
title_full_unstemmed Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record
title_short Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record
title_sort expected anomalies in the fossil record
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2614194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19204808
work_keys_str_mv AT fischermareike expectedanomaliesinthefossilrecord
AT steelmike expectedanomaliesinthefossilrecord