Cargando…
Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record
The problem of intermediates in the fossil record has been frequently discussed ever since Darwin. The extent of ‘gaps’ (missing transitional stages) has been used to argue against gradual evolution from a common ancestor. Traditionally, gaps have often been explained by the improbability of fossili...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Libertas Academica
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2614194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19204808 |
_version_ | 1782163220851589120 |
---|---|
author | Fischer, Mareike Steel, Mike |
author_facet | Fischer, Mareike Steel, Mike |
author_sort | Fischer, Mareike |
collection | PubMed |
description | The problem of intermediates in the fossil record has been frequently discussed ever since Darwin. The extent of ‘gaps’ (missing transitional stages) has been used to argue against gradual evolution from a common ancestor. Traditionally, gaps have often been explained by the improbability of fossilization and the discontinuous selection of found fossils. Here we take an analytical approach and demonstrate why, under certain sampling conditions, we may not expect intermediates to be found. Using a simple null model, we show mathematically that the question of whether a taxon sampled from some time in the past is likely to be morphologically intermediate to other samples (dated earlier and later) depends on the shape and dimensions of the underlying phylogenetic tree that connects the taxa, and the times from which the fossils are sampled. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2614194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Libertas Academica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26141942009-02-09 Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record Fischer, Mareike Steel, Mike Evol Bioinform Online Original Research The problem of intermediates in the fossil record has been frequently discussed ever since Darwin. The extent of ‘gaps’ (missing transitional stages) has been used to argue against gradual evolution from a common ancestor. Traditionally, gaps have often been explained by the improbability of fossilization and the discontinuous selection of found fossils. Here we take an analytical approach and demonstrate why, under certain sampling conditions, we may not expect intermediates to be found. Using a simple null model, we show mathematically that the question of whether a taxon sampled from some time in the past is likely to be morphologically intermediate to other samples (dated earlier and later) depends on the shape and dimensions of the underlying phylogenetic tree that connects the taxa, and the times from which the fossils are sampled. Libertas Academica 2008-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2614194/ /pubmed/19204808 Text en Copyright © 2008 The authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution By licence. For further information go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0) |
spellingShingle | Original Research Fischer, Mareike Steel, Mike Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record |
title | Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record |
title_full | Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record |
title_fullStr | Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record |
title_full_unstemmed | Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record |
title_short | Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record |
title_sort | expected anomalies in the fossil record |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2614194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19204808 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fischermareike expectedanomaliesinthefossilrecord AT steelmike expectedanomaliesinthefossilrecord |