Cargando…
Moral Enhancement
Opponents of biomedical enhancement often claim that, even if such enhancement would benefit the enhanced, it would harm others. But this objection looks unpersuasive when the enhancement in question is a moral enhancement — an enhancement that will expectably leave the enhanced person with morally...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2614680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19132138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00412.x |
_version_ | 1782163249019486208 |
---|---|
author | Douglas, Thomas |
author_facet | Douglas, Thomas |
author_sort | Douglas, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Opponents of biomedical enhancement often claim that, even if such enhancement would benefit the enhanced, it would harm others. But this objection looks unpersuasive when the enhancement in question is a moral enhancement — an enhancement that will expectably leave the enhanced person with morally better motives than she had previously. In this article I (1) describe one type of psychological alteration that would plausibly qualify as a moral enhancement, (2) argue that we will, in the medium-term future, probably be able to induce such alterations via biomedical intervention, and (3) defend future engagement in such moral enhancements against possible objections. My aim is to present this kind of moral enhancement as a counter-example to the view that biomedical enhancement is always morally impermissible. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2614680 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26146802009-01-07 Moral Enhancement Douglas, Thomas J Appl Philos Special Issuethe Ethics of Enhancement Opponents of biomedical enhancement often claim that, even if such enhancement would benefit the enhanced, it would harm others. But this objection looks unpersuasive when the enhancement in question is a moral enhancement — an enhancement that will expectably leave the enhanced person with morally better motives than she had previously. In this article I (1) describe one type of psychological alteration that would plausibly qualify as a moral enhancement, (2) argue that we will, in the medium-term future, probably be able to induce such alterations via biomedical intervention, and (3) defend future engagement in such moral enhancements against possible objections. My aim is to present this kind of moral enhancement as a counter-example to the view that biomedical enhancement is always morally impermissible. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2614680/ /pubmed/19132138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00412.x Text en © 2008 Society for Applied Philosophy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Special Issuethe Ethics of Enhancement Douglas, Thomas Moral Enhancement |
title | Moral Enhancement |
title_full | Moral Enhancement |
title_fullStr | Moral Enhancement |
title_full_unstemmed | Moral Enhancement |
title_short | Moral Enhancement |
title_sort | moral enhancement |
topic | Special Issuethe Ethics of Enhancement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2614680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19132138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00412.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT douglasthomas moralenhancement |