Cargando…

Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoprosthetic replacements of the proximal femur are commonly required to treat destructive metastases with either impending or actual pathological fractures at this site. Modular prostheses provide an off the shelf availability and can be adapted to most reconstructive situati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandrasekar, Coonoor R, Grimer, Robert J, Carter, Simon R, Tillman, Roger M, Abudu, Adesegun T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2614964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18983677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-3-50
_version_ 1782163264128417792
author Chandrasekar, Coonoor R
Grimer, Robert J
Carter, Simon R
Tillman, Roger M
Abudu, Adesegun T
author_facet Chandrasekar, Coonoor R
Grimer, Robert J
Carter, Simon R
Tillman, Roger M
Abudu, Adesegun T
author_sort Chandrasekar, Coonoor R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoprosthetic replacements of the proximal femur are commonly required to treat destructive metastases with either impending or actual pathological fractures at this site. Modular prostheses provide an off the shelf availability and can be adapted to most reconstructive situations for proximal femoral replacements. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes following modular tumour prosthesis reconstruction of the proximal femur in 100 consecutive patients with metastatic tumours and to compare them with the published results of patients with modular and custom made endoprosthetic replacements. METHODS: 100 consecutive patients who underwent modular tumour prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur for metastases using the METS system from 2001 to 2007 were studied. The patient, tumour and treatment factors in relation to overall survival, local control, implant survival and complications were analysed. Functional scores were obtained from surviving patients. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: There were 45 male and 55 female patients. The mean age was 60.2 years. The indications were metastases. Seventy five patients presented with pathological fracture or with failed fixation and 25 patients were at a high risk of developing a fracture. The mean follow up was 15.9 months [range 0–77]. Three patients died within 2 weeks following surgery. 69 patients have died and 31 are alive. Of the 69 patients who were dead 68 did not need revision surgery indicating that the implant provided single definitive treatment which outlived the patient. There were three dislocations (2/5 with THR and 1/95 with unipolar femoral heads). 6 patients had deep infections. The estimated five year implant survival (Kaplan-Meier analysis) was 83.1% with revision as end point. The mean TESS score was 64% (54%–82%). We conclude that METS modular tumour prosthesis for proximal femur provides versatility; low implant related complications and acceptable function lasting the lifetime of the patients with metastatic tumours of the proximal femur.
format Text
id pubmed-2614964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26149642009-01-08 Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur Chandrasekar, Coonoor R Grimer, Robert J Carter, Simon R Tillman, Roger M Abudu, Adesegun T J Orthop Surg Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoprosthetic replacements of the proximal femur are commonly required to treat destructive metastases with either impending or actual pathological fractures at this site. Modular prostheses provide an off the shelf availability and can be adapted to most reconstructive situations for proximal femoral replacements. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes following modular tumour prosthesis reconstruction of the proximal femur in 100 consecutive patients with metastatic tumours and to compare them with the published results of patients with modular and custom made endoprosthetic replacements. METHODS: 100 consecutive patients who underwent modular tumour prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur for metastases using the METS system from 2001 to 2007 were studied. The patient, tumour and treatment factors in relation to overall survival, local control, implant survival and complications were analysed. Functional scores were obtained from surviving patients. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: There were 45 male and 55 female patients. The mean age was 60.2 years. The indications were metastases. Seventy five patients presented with pathological fracture or with failed fixation and 25 patients were at a high risk of developing a fracture. The mean follow up was 15.9 months [range 0–77]. Three patients died within 2 weeks following surgery. 69 patients have died and 31 are alive. Of the 69 patients who were dead 68 did not need revision surgery indicating that the implant provided single definitive treatment which outlived the patient. There were three dislocations (2/5 with THR and 1/95 with unipolar femoral heads). 6 patients had deep infections. The estimated five year implant survival (Kaplan-Meier analysis) was 83.1% with revision as end point. The mean TESS score was 64% (54%–82%). We conclude that METS modular tumour prosthesis for proximal femur provides versatility; low implant related complications and acceptable function lasting the lifetime of the patients with metastatic tumours of the proximal femur. BioMed Central 2008-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2614964/ /pubmed/18983677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-3-50 Text en Copyright © 2008 Chandrasekar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chandrasekar, Coonoor R
Grimer, Robert J
Carter, Simon R
Tillman, Roger M
Abudu, Adesegun T
Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur
title Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur
title_full Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur
title_fullStr Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur
title_full_unstemmed Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur
title_short Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur
title_sort modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2614964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18983677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-3-50
work_keys_str_mv AT chandrasekarcoonoorr modularendoprostheticreplacementformetastatictumoursoftheproximalfemur
AT grimerrobertj modularendoprostheticreplacementformetastatictumoursoftheproximalfemur
AT cartersimonr modularendoprostheticreplacementformetastatictumoursoftheproximalfemur
AT tillmanrogerm modularendoprostheticreplacementformetastatictumoursoftheproximalfemur
AT abuduadesegunt modularendoprostheticreplacementformetastatictumoursoftheproximalfemur