Cargando…

Exon definition as a potential negative force against intron losses in evolution

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated that the wide variation in intron density (the number of introns per gene) among different eukaryotes largely reflects varying degrees of intron loss during evolution. The most popular model, which suggests that organisms lose introns through a mechanism i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Niu, Deng-Ke
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2614967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19014515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-3-46
_version_ 1782163264838303744
author Niu, Deng-Ke
author_facet Niu, Deng-Ke
author_sort Niu, Deng-Ke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated that the wide variation in intron density (the number of introns per gene) among different eukaryotes largely reflects varying degrees of intron loss during evolution. The most popular model, which suggests that organisms lose introns through a mechanism in which reverse-transcribed cDNA recombines with the genomic DNA, concerns only one mutational force. HYPOTHESIS: Using exons as the units of splicing-site recognition, exon definition constrains the length of exons. An intron-loss event results in fusion of flanking exons and thus a larger exon. The large size of the newborn exon may cause splicing errors, i.e., exon skipping, if the splicing of pre-mRNAs is initiated by exon definition. By contrast, if the splicing of pre-mRNAs is initiated by intron definition, intron loss does not matter. Exon definition may thus be a selective force against intron loss. An organism with a high frequency of exon definition is expected to experience a low rate of intron loss throughout evolution and have a high density of spliceosomal introns. CONCLUSION: The majority of spliceosomal introns in vertebrates may be maintained during evolution not because of potential functions, but because of their splicing mechanism (i.e., exon definition). Further research is required to determine whether exon definition is a negative force in maintaining the high intron density of vertebrates. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Dr. Scott W. Roy (nominated by Dr. John Logsdon), Dr. Eugene V. Koonin, and Dr. Igor B. Rogozin (nominated by Dr. Mikhail Gelfand). For the full reviews, please go to the Reviewers' comments section.
format Text
id pubmed-2614967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26149672009-01-08 Exon definition as a potential negative force against intron losses in evolution Niu, Deng-Ke Biol Direct Hypothesis BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated that the wide variation in intron density (the number of introns per gene) among different eukaryotes largely reflects varying degrees of intron loss during evolution. The most popular model, which suggests that organisms lose introns through a mechanism in which reverse-transcribed cDNA recombines with the genomic DNA, concerns only one mutational force. HYPOTHESIS: Using exons as the units of splicing-site recognition, exon definition constrains the length of exons. An intron-loss event results in fusion of flanking exons and thus a larger exon. The large size of the newborn exon may cause splicing errors, i.e., exon skipping, if the splicing of pre-mRNAs is initiated by exon definition. By contrast, if the splicing of pre-mRNAs is initiated by intron definition, intron loss does not matter. Exon definition may thus be a selective force against intron loss. An organism with a high frequency of exon definition is expected to experience a low rate of intron loss throughout evolution and have a high density of spliceosomal introns. CONCLUSION: The majority of spliceosomal introns in vertebrates may be maintained during evolution not because of potential functions, but because of their splicing mechanism (i.e., exon definition). Further research is required to determine whether exon definition is a negative force in maintaining the high intron density of vertebrates. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Dr. Scott W. Roy (nominated by Dr. John Logsdon), Dr. Eugene V. Koonin, and Dr. Igor B. Rogozin (nominated by Dr. Mikhail Gelfand). For the full reviews, please go to the Reviewers' comments section. BioMed Central 2008-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2614967/ /pubmed/19014515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-3-46 Text en Copyright © 2008 Niu; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hypothesis
Niu, Deng-Ke
Exon definition as a potential negative force against intron losses in evolution
title Exon definition as a potential negative force against intron losses in evolution
title_full Exon definition as a potential negative force against intron losses in evolution
title_fullStr Exon definition as a potential negative force against intron losses in evolution
title_full_unstemmed Exon definition as a potential negative force against intron losses in evolution
title_short Exon definition as a potential negative force against intron losses in evolution
title_sort exon definition as a potential negative force against intron losses in evolution
topic Hypothesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2614967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19014515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-3-46
work_keys_str_mv AT niudengke exondefinitionasapotentialnegativeforceagainstintronlossesinevolution