Cargando…

Comparison of In-house PCR with Conventional Techniques and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis™ Kit for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

PURPOSE: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, introduced as a fast and sensitive diagnostic method, is useful in detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of in-house PCR assay in the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by comparing PCR resu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Myeong-Hee, Yang, Hee-Young, Suh, Jin-Tae, Lee, Hee Joo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2615280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18729295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2008.49.4.537
_version_ 1782163304042463232
author Kim, Myeong-Hee
Yang, Hee-Young
Suh, Jin-Tae
Lee, Hee Joo
author_facet Kim, Myeong-Hee
Yang, Hee-Young
Suh, Jin-Tae
Lee, Hee Joo
author_sort Kim, Myeong-Hee
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, introduced as a fast and sensitive diagnostic method, is useful in detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of in-house PCR assay in the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by comparing PCR results with conventional diagnostic techniques and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis™ kit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the diagnostic yield of in-house PCR method employed for the amplification IS6110 sequences in 2,973 specimens. We also compared in-house PCR with Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis™ kit in 120 specimens collected from June to July 2006. Routine acid-fast stain (AFS) and culture assay were also performed and analyzed. RESULTS: Of 2,973 cases, 2,832 cases (95.3%) showed consistent results between in house PCR, AFS and culture methods, whereas 141 (4.7%) displayed inconsistent results. The sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of each method were as follows: 77.5%, 99.7%, 95.5%, and 98.0%, respectively for PCR; 49.2%, 100%, 100%, and 95.7%, respectively, for AFS method; and 80.7%, 100%, 100%, and 98.3%, respectively, for culture assay. Consistent results between PCR and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis™ kit were shown in 109 cases (90.8%). The sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of each method were as follows: 81.3%, 98.9%, 96.3%, and 93.5% respectively for PCR and 71.9%, 100%, 100%, and 90.7%, respectively, for Cobas Amplicor™ kit. CONCLUSION: In-house PCR and Cobas Amplicor™ kit show high sensitivity and specificity, and are reliable tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.
format Text
id pubmed-2615280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26152802009-02-02 Comparison of In-house PCR with Conventional Techniques and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis™ Kit for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Kim, Myeong-Hee Yang, Hee-Young Suh, Jin-Tae Lee, Hee Joo Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, introduced as a fast and sensitive diagnostic method, is useful in detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of in-house PCR assay in the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by comparing PCR results with conventional diagnostic techniques and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis™ kit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the diagnostic yield of in-house PCR method employed for the amplification IS6110 sequences in 2,973 specimens. We also compared in-house PCR with Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis™ kit in 120 specimens collected from June to July 2006. Routine acid-fast stain (AFS) and culture assay were also performed and analyzed. RESULTS: Of 2,973 cases, 2,832 cases (95.3%) showed consistent results between in house PCR, AFS and culture methods, whereas 141 (4.7%) displayed inconsistent results. The sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of each method were as follows: 77.5%, 99.7%, 95.5%, and 98.0%, respectively for PCR; 49.2%, 100%, 100%, and 95.7%, respectively, for AFS method; and 80.7%, 100%, 100%, and 98.3%, respectively, for culture assay. Consistent results between PCR and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis™ kit were shown in 109 cases (90.8%). The sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of each method were as follows: 81.3%, 98.9%, 96.3%, and 93.5% respectively for PCR and 71.9%, 100%, 100%, and 90.7%, respectively, for Cobas Amplicor™ kit. CONCLUSION: In-house PCR and Cobas Amplicor™ kit show high sensitivity and specificity, and are reliable tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2008-08-30 2008-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2615280/ /pubmed/18729295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2008.49.4.537 Text en Copyright © 2008 The Yonsei University College of Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Myeong-Hee
Yang, Hee-Young
Suh, Jin-Tae
Lee, Hee Joo
Comparison of In-house PCR with Conventional Techniques and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis™ Kit for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title Comparison of In-house PCR with Conventional Techniques and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis™ Kit for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_full Comparison of In-house PCR with Conventional Techniques and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis™ Kit for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_fullStr Comparison of In-house PCR with Conventional Techniques and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis™ Kit for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of In-house PCR with Conventional Techniques and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis™ Kit for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_short Comparison of In-house PCR with Conventional Techniques and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis™ Kit for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_sort comparison of in-house pcr with conventional techniques and cobas amplicor m. tuberculosis™ kit for detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2615280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18729295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2008.49.4.537
work_keys_str_mv AT kimmyeonghee comparisonofinhousepcrwithconventionaltechniquesandcobasamplicormtuberculosiskitfordetectionofmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT yangheeyoung comparisonofinhousepcrwithconventionaltechniquesandcobasamplicormtuberculosiskitfordetectionofmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT suhjintae comparisonofinhousepcrwithconventionaltechniquesandcobasamplicormtuberculosiskitfordetectionofmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT leeheejoo comparisonofinhousepcrwithconventionaltechniquesandcobasamplicormtuberculosiskitfordetectionofmycobacteriumtuberculosis