Cargando…
Is Electrical Stimulation Beneficial for Improving the Paralytic Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Children with Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy?
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether electrical stimulation (ES) improves the paralytic effect of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and evaluate the differences between low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) ES in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP). M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Yonsei University College of Medicine
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2615281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18729296 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2008.49.4.545 |
_version_ | 1782163304273149952 |
---|---|
author | Rha, Dong-wook Yang, Eun Joo Chung, Ho Ik Kim, Hyoung Bin Park, Chang-il Park, Eun Sook |
author_facet | Rha, Dong-wook Yang, Eun Joo Chung, Ho Ik Kim, Hyoung Bin Park, Chang-il Park, Eun Sook |
author_sort | Rha, Dong-wook |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether electrical stimulation (ES) improves the paralytic effect of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and evaluate the differences between low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) ES in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three children with spastic diplegia CP who had BTX-A injections into both gastrocnemius muscles were assessed. Following the toxin injection, electrical stimulation was given to 1 side of the injected muscles and a sham-stimulation to the other side for 30 min a day for 7 consecutive days [HFES (25 Hz) to 11 children, LFES (4 Hz) to 12 children]. The compound motor action potentials (CMAP) from the gastrocnemius muscle were assessed before injection and at 5 time points (days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 30) after injection. The clinical assessments of spasticity were performed before and 30 days after injection. RESULTS: The CMAP area became significantly lower in both LFES and HFES sides from 3 days after injection compared to baseline values. In other words, the CMAP area of the sham-stimulated side showed a significant decrease at 7 or 14 days after injection. However, there were no significant differences in clinical assessment of spasticity between the stimulated and sham-stimulated sides. CONCLUSION: Short-term ES in both LF and HF to the spastic muscles injected with BTX-A might induce earlier denervating action of BTX-A. However, it does not necessarily lead to clinical and electrophysiological benefits in terms of reduction of spasticity. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2615281 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Yonsei University College of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26152812009-02-02 Is Electrical Stimulation Beneficial for Improving the Paralytic Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Children with Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy? Rha, Dong-wook Yang, Eun Joo Chung, Ho Ik Kim, Hyoung Bin Park, Chang-il Park, Eun Sook Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether electrical stimulation (ES) improves the paralytic effect of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and evaluate the differences between low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) ES in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three children with spastic diplegia CP who had BTX-A injections into both gastrocnemius muscles were assessed. Following the toxin injection, electrical stimulation was given to 1 side of the injected muscles and a sham-stimulation to the other side for 30 min a day for 7 consecutive days [HFES (25 Hz) to 11 children, LFES (4 Hz) to 12 children]. The compound motor action potentials (CMAP) from the gastrocnemius muscle were assessed before injection and at 5 time points (days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 30) after injection. The clinical assessments of spasticity were performed before and 30 days after injection. RESULTS: The CMAP area became significantly lower in both LFES and HFES sides from 3 days after injection compared to baseline values. In other words, the CMAP area of the sham-stimulated side showed a significant decrease at 7 or 14 days after injection. However, there were no significant differences in clinical assessment of spasticity between the stimulated and sham-stimulated sides. CONCLUSION: Short-term ES in both LF and HF to the spastic muscles injected with BTX-A might induce earlier denervating action of BTX-A. However, it does not necessarily lead to clinical and electrophysiological benefits in terms of reduction of spasticity. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2008-08-30 2008-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2615281/ /pubmed/18729296 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2008.49.4.545 Text en Copyright © 2008 The Yonsei University College of Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rha, Dong-wook Yang, Eun Joo Chung, Ho Ik Kim, Hyoung Bin Park, Chang-il Park, Eun Sook Is Electrical Stimulation Beneficial for Improving the Paralytic Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Children with Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy? |
title | Is Electrical Stimulation Beneficial for Improving the Paralytic Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Children with Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy? |
title_full | Is Electrical Stimulation Beneficial for Improving the Paralytic Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Children with Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy? |
title_fullStr | Is Electrical Stimulation Beneficial for Improving the Paralytic Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Children with Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Electrical Stimulation Beneficial for Improving the Paralytic Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Children with Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy? |
title_short | Is Electrical Stimulation Beneficial for Improving the Paralytic Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Children with Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy? |
title_sort | is electrical stimulation beneficial for improving the paralytic effect of botulinum toxin type a in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2615281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18729296 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2008.49.4.545 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rhadongwook iselectricalstimulationbeneficialforimprovingtheparalyticeffectofbotulinumtoxintypeainchildrenwithspasticdiplegiccerebralpalsy AT yangeunjoo iselectricalstimulationbeneficialforimprovingtheparalyticeffectofbotulinumtoxintypeainchildrenwithspasticdiplegiccerebralpalsy AT chunghoik iselectricalstimulationbeneficialforimprovingtheparalyticeffectofbotulinumtoxintypeainchildrenwithspasticdiplegiccerebralpalsy AT kimhyoungbin iselectricalstimulationbeneficialforimprovingtheparalyticeffectofbotulinumtoxintypeainchildrenwithspasticdiplegiccerebralpalsy AT parkchangil iselectricalstimulationbeneficialforimprovingtheparalyticeffectofbotulinumtoxintypeainchildrenwithspasticdiplegiccerebralpalsy AT parkeunsook iselectricalstimulationbeneficialforimprovingtheparalyticeffectofbotulinumtoxintypeainchildrenwithspasticdiplegiccerebralpalsy |