Cargando…

Are we degenerate tetraploids? More genomes, new facts

BACKGROUND: Within the bilaterians, the appearance and evolution of vertebrates is accompanied by enormous changes in anatomical, morphological and developmental features. This evolution of increased complexity has been associated with two genome duplications (2R hypothesis) at the origin of vertebr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Abbasi, Amir Ali
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2615429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19077184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-3-50
_version_ 1782163331375693824
author Abbasi, Amir Ali
author_facet Abbasi, Amir Ali
author_sort Abbasi, Amir Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Within the bilaterians, the appearance and evolution of vertebrates is accompanied by enormous changes in anatomical, morphological and developmental features. This evolution of increased complexity has been associated with two genome duplications (2R hypothesis) at the origin of vertebrates. However, in spite of extensive debate the validity of the 2R hypothesis remains controversial. The paucity of sequence data in early years of genomic era was an intrinsic obstacle in tracking the genome evolutionary history of chordates. HYPOTHESIS: In this article I review the 2R hypothesis by taking into account the recent availability of genomic sequence data for an expanding range of animals. I argue here that genetic architecture of lower metazoans and representatives of major vertebrate and invertebrate lineages provides no support for the hypothesis relating the origin of vertebrates with widespread gene or genome duplications. CONCLUSION: It appears that much of the genomic complexity of modern vertebrates is very ancient likely predating the origin of chordates or even the Bilaterian-Nonbilaterian divergence. The origin and evolution of vertebrates is partly accompanied by an increase in gene number. However, neither can we take this subtle increase in gene number as an only causative factor for evolution of phenotypic complexity in modern vertebrates nor we can take it as a reflection of polyplodization events early in their history. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Eugene Koonin, Joshua Cherry (nominated by David Lipman), and Jerzy Jurka.
format Text
id pubmed-2615429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26154292009-01-09 Are we degenerate tetraploids? More genomes, new facts Abbasi, Amir Ali Biol Direct Hypothesis BACKGROUND: Within the bilaterians, the appearance and evolution of vertebrates is accompanied by enormous changes in anatomical, morphological and developmental features. This evolution of increased complexity has been associated with two genome duplications (2R hypothesis) at the origin of vertebrates. However, in spite of extensive debate the validity of the 2R hypothesis remains controversial. The paucity of sequence data in early years of genomic era was an intrinsic obstacle in tracking the genome evolutionary history of chordates. HYPOTHESIS: In this article I review the 2R hypothesis by taking into account the recent availability of genomic sequence data for an expanding range of animals. I argue here that genetic architecture of lower metazoans and representatives of major vertebrate and invertebrate lineages provides no support for the hypothesis relating the origin of vertebrates with widespread gene or genome duplications. CONCLUSION: It appears that much of the genomic complexity of modern vertebrates is very ancient likely predating the origin of chordates or even the Bilaterian-Nonbilaterian divergence. The origin and evolution of vertebrates is partly accompanied by an increase in gene number. However, neither can we take this subtle increase in gene number as an only causative factor for evolution of phenotypic complexity in modern vertebrates nor we can take it as a reflection of polyplodization events early in their history. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Eugene Koonin, Joshua Cherry (nominated by David Lipman), and Jerzy Jurka. BioMed Central 2008-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2615429/ /pubmed/19077184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-3-50 Text en Copyright © 2008 Abbasi; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hypothesis
Abbasi, Amir Ali
Are we degenerate tetraploids? More genomes, new facts
title Are we degenerate tetraploids? More genomes, new facts
title_full Are we degenerate tetraploids? More genomes, new facts
title_fullStr Are we degenerate tetraploids? More genomes, new facts
title_full_unstemmed Are we degenerate tetraploids? More genomes, new facts
title_short Are we degenerate tetraploids? More genomes, new facts
title_sort are we degenerate tetraploids? more genomes, new facts
topic Hypothesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2615429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19077184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-3-50
work_keys_str_mv AT abbasiamirali arewedegeneratetetraploidsmoregenomesnewfacts