Cargando…

Establishing an adjusted p-value threshold to control the family-wide type 1 error in genome wide association studies

BACKGROUND: By assaying hundreds of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms, genome wide association studies (GWAS) allow for a powerful, unbiased review of the entire genome to localize common genetic variants that influence health and disease. Although it is widely recognized that some correc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duggal, Priya, Gillanders, Elizabeth M, Holmes, Taura N, Bailey-Wilson, Joan E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2621212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18976480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-516
_version_ 1782163384066637824
author Duggal, Priya
Gillanders, Elizabeth M
Holmes, Taura N
Bailey-Wilson, Joan E
author_facet Duggal, Priya
Gillanders, Elizabeth M
Holmes, Taura N
Bailey-Wilson, Joan E
author_sort Duggal, Priya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: By assaying hundreds of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms, genome wide association studies (GWAS) allow for a powerful, unbiased review of the entire genome to localize common genetic variants that influence health and disease. Although it is widely recognized that some correction for multiple testing is necessary, in order to control the family-wide Type 1 Error in genetic association studies, it is not clear which method to utilize. One simple approach is to perform a Bonferroni correction using all n single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome; however this approach is highly conservative and would "overcorrect" for SNPs that are not truly independent. Many SNPs fall within regions of strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) ("blocks") and should not be considered "independent". RESULTS: We proposed to approximate the number of "independent" SNPs by counting 1 SNP per LD block, plus all SNPs outside of blocks (interblock SNPs). We examined the effective number of independent SNPs for Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) panels. In the CEPH Utah (CEU) population, by considering the interdependence of SNPs, we could reduce the total number of effective tests within the Affymetrix and Illumina SNP panels from 500,000 and 317,000 to 67,000 and 82,000 "independent" SNPs, respectively. For the Affymetrix 500 K and Illumina 317 K GWAS SNP panels we recommend using 10(-5), 10(-7 )and 10(-8 )and for the Phase II HapMap CEPH Utah and Yoruba populations we recommend using 10(-6), 10(-7 )and 10(-9 )as "suggestive", "significant" and "highly significant" p-value thresholds to properly control the family-wide Type 1 error. CONCLUSION: By approximating the effective number of independent SNPs across the genome we are able to 'correct' for a more accurate number of tests and therefore develop 'LD adjusted' Bonferroni corrected p-value thresholds that account for the interdepdendence of SNPs on well-utilized commercially available SNP "chips". These thresholds will serve as guides to researchers trying to decide which regions of the genome should be studied further.
format Text
id pubmed-2621212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26212122009-01-13 Establishing an adjusted p-value threshold to control the family-wide type 1 error in genome wide association studies Duggal, Priya Gillanders, Elizabeth M Holmes, Taura N Bailey-Wilson, Joan E BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: By assaying hundreds of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms, genome wide association studies (GWAS) allow for a powerful, unbiased review of the entire genome to localize common genetic variants that influence health and disease. Although it is widely recognized that some correction for multiple testing is necessary, in order to control the family-wide Type 1 Error in genetic association studies, it is not clear which method to utilize. One simple approach is to perform a Bonferroni correction using all n single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome; however this approach is highly conservative and would "overcorrect" for SNPs that are not truly independent. Many SNPs fall within regions of strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) ("blocks") and should not be considered "independent". RESULTS: We proposed to approximate the number of "independent" SNPs by counting 1 SNP per LD block, plus all SNPs outside of blocks (interblock SNPs). We examined the effective number of independent SNPs for Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) panels. In the CEPH Utah (CEU) population, by considering the interdependence of SNPs, we could reduce the total number of effective tests within the Affymetrix and Illumina SNP panels from 500,000 and 317,000 to 67,000 and 82,000 "independent" SNPs, respectively. For the Affymetrix 500 K and Illumina 317 K GWAS SNP panels we recommend using 10(-5), 10(-7 )and 10(-8 )and for the Phase II HapMap CEPH Utah and Yoruba populations we recommend using 10(-6), 10(-7 )and 10(-9 )as "suggestive", "significant" and "highly significant" p-value thresholds to properly control the family-wide Type 1 error. CONCLUSION: By approximating the effective number of independent SNPs across the genome we are able to 'correct' for a more accurate number of tests and therefore develop 'LD adjusted' Bonferroni corrected p-value thresholds that account for the interdepdendence of SNPs on well-utilized commercially available SNP "chips". These thresholds will serve as guides to researchers trying to decide which regions of the genome should be studied further. BioMed Central 2008-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2621212/ /pubmed/18976480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-516 Text en Copyright © 2008 Duggal et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Duggal, Priya
Gillanders, Elizabeth M
Holmes, Taura N
Bailey-Wilson, Joan E
Establishing an adjusted p-value threshold to control the family-wide type 1 error in genome wide association studies
title Establishing an adjusted p-value threshold to control the family-wide type 1 error in genome wide association studies
title_full Establishing an adjusted p-value threshold to control the family-wide type 1 error in genome wide association studies
title_fullStr Establishing an adjusted p-value threshold to control the family-wide type 1 error in genome wide association studies
title_full_unstemmed Establishing an adjusted p-value threshold to control the family-wide type 1 error in genome wide association studies
title_short Establishing an adjusted p-value threshold to control the family-wide type 1 error in genome wide association studies
title_sort establishing an adjusted p-value threshold to control the family-wide type 1 error in genome wide association studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2621212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18976480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-516
work_keys_str_mv AT duggalpriya establishinganadjustedpvaluethresholdtocontrolthefamilywidetype1erroringenomewideassociationstudies
AT gillanderselizabethm establishinganadjustedpvaluethresholdtocontrolthefamilywidetype1erroringenomewideassociationstudies
AT holmestauran establishinganadjustedpvaluethresholdtocontrolthefamilywidetype1erroringenomewideassociationstudies
AT baileywilsonjoane establishinganadjustedpvaluethresholdtocontrolthefamilywidetype1erroringenomewideassociationstudies