Cargando…
Examining the Medical Blogosphere: An Online Survey of Medical Bloggers
BACKGROUND: Blogs are the major contributors to the large increase of new websites created each year. Most blogs allow readers to leave comments and, in this way, generate both conversation and encourage collaboration. Despite their popularity, however, little is known about blogs or their creators....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Gunther Eysenbach
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2626433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18812312 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1118 |
_version_ | 1782163450442547200 |
---|---|
author | Kovic, Ivor Lulic, Ileana Brumini, Gordana |
author_facet | Kovic, Ivor Lulic, Ileana Brumini, Gordana |
author_sort | Kovic, Ivor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Blogs are the major contributors to the large increase of new websites created each year. Most blogs allow readers to leave comments and, in this way, generate both conversation and encourage collaboration. Despite their popularity, however, little is known about blogs or their creators. OBJECTIVES: To contribute to a better understanding of the medical blogosphere by investigating the characteristics of medical bloggers and their blogs, including bloggers’ Internet and blogging habits, their motivations for blogging, and whether or not they follow practices associated with journalism. METHODS: We approached 197 medical bloggers of English-language medical blogs which provided direct contact information, with posts published within the past month. The survey included 37 items designed to evaluate data about Internet and blogging habits, blog characteristics, blogging motivations, and, finally, the demographic data of bloggers. Pearson’s Chi-Square test was used to assess the significance of an association between 2 categorical variables. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was utilized to reveal the relationship between participants’ ages, as well as the number of maintained blogs, and their motivation for blogging. The Mann-Whitney U test was employed to reveal relationships between practices associated with journalism and participants’ characteristics like gender and pseudonym use. RESULTS: A total of 80 (42%) of 197 eligible participants responded. The majority of responding bloggers were white (75%), highly educated (71% with a Masters degree or doctorate), male (59%), residents of the United States (72%), between the ages of 30 and 49 (58%), and working in the healthcare industry (67%). Most of them were experienced bloggers, with 23% (18/80) blogging for 4 or more years, 38% (30/80) for 2 or 3 years, 32% (26/80) for about a year, and only 7% (6/80) for 6 months or less. Those who received attention from the news media numbered 66% (53/80). When it comes to best practices associated with journalism, the participants most frequently reported including links to original source of material and spending extra time verifying facts, while rarely seeking permission to post copyrighted material. Bloggers who have published a scientific paper were more likely to quote other people or media than those who have never published such a paper (U= 506.5, n(1)= 41, n(2)= 35, P= .016). Those blogging under their real name more often included links to original sources than those writing under a pseudonym (U= 446.5, n(1)= 58, n(2)= 19, P= .01). Major motivations for blogging were sharing practical knowledge or skills with others, influencing the way others think, and expressing oneself creatively. CONCLUSIONS: Medical bloggers are highly educated and devoted blog writers, faithful to their sources and readers. Sharing practical knowledge and skills, as well as influencing the way other people think, were major motivations for blogging among our medical bloggers. Medical blogs are frequently picked up by mainstream media; thus, blogs are an important vehicle to influence medical and health policy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2626433 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Gunther Eysenbach |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26264332009-01-15 Examining the Medical Blogosphere: An Online Survey of Medical Bloggers Kovic, Ivor Lulic, Ileana Brumini, Gordana J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Blogs are the major contributors to the large increase of new websites created each year. Most blogs allow readers to leave comments and, in this way, generate both conversation and encourage collaboration. Despite their popularity, however, little is known about blogs or their creators. OBJECTIVES: To contribute to a better understanding of the medical blogosphere by investigating the characteristics of medical bloggers and their blogs, including bloggers’ Internet and blogging habits, their motivations for blogging, and whether or not they follow practices associated with journalism. METHODS: We approached 197 medical bloggers of English-language medical blogs which provided direct contact information, with posts published within the past month. The survey included 37 items designed to evaluate data about Internet and blogging habits, blog characteristics, blogging motivations, and, finally, the demographic data of bloggers. Pearson’s Chi-Square test was used to assess the significance of an association between 2 categorical variables. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was utilized to reveal the relationship between participants’ ages, as well as the number of maintained blogs, and their motivation for blogging. The Mann-Whitney U test was employed to reveal relationships between practices associated with journalism and participants’ characteristics like gender and pseudonym use. RESULTS: A total of 80 (42%) of 197 eligible participants responded. The majority of responding bloggers were white (75%), highly educated (71% with a Masters degree or doctorate), male (59%), residents of the United States (72%), between the ages of 30 and 49 (58%), and working in the healthcare industry (67%). Most of them were experienced bloggers, with 23% (18/80) blogging for 4 or more years, 38% (30/80) for 2 or 3 years, 32% (26/80) for about a year, and only 7% (6/80) for 6 months or less. Those who received attention from the news media numbered 66% (53/80). When it comes to best practices associated with journalism, the participants most frequently reported including links to original source of material and spending extra time verifying facts, while rarely seeking permission to post copyrighted material. Bloggers who have published a scientific paper were more likely to quote other people or media than those who have never published such a paper (U= 506.5, n(1)= 41, n(2)= 35, P= .016). Those blogging under their real name more often included links to original sources than those writing under a pseudonym (U= 446.5, n(1)= 58, n(2)= 19, P= .01). Major motivations for blogging were sharing practical knowledge or skills with others, influencing the way others think, and expressing oneself creatively. CONCLUSIONS: Medical bloggers are highly educated and devoted blog writers, faithful to their sources and readers. Sharing practical knowledge and skills, as well as influencing the way other people think, were major motivations for blogging among our medical bloggers. Medical blogs are frequently picked up by mainstream media; thus, blogs are an important vehicle to influence medical and health policy. Gunther Eysenbach 2008-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2626433/ /pubmed/18812312 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1118 Text en © Ivor Kovic, Ileana Lulic, Gordana Brumini. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 23.09.2008. Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided 1) the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the original article URL on www.jmir.org, and 2) this statement is included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kovic, Ivor Lulic, Ileana Brumini, Gordana Examining the Medical Blogosphere: An Online Survey of Medical Bloggers |
title | Examining the Medical Blogosphere: An Online Survey of Medical Bloggers |
title_full | Examining the Medical Blogosphere: An Online Survey of Medical Bloggers |
title_fullStr | Examining the Medical Blogosphere: An Online Survey of Medical Bloggers |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining the Medical Blogosphere: An Online Survey of Medical Bloggers |
title_short | Examining the Medical Blogosphere: An Online Survey of Medical Bloggers |
title_sort | examining the medical blogosphere: an online survey of medical bloggers |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2626433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18812312 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kovicivor examiningthemedicalblogosphereanonlinesurveyofmedicalbloggers AT lulicileana examiningthemedicalblogosphereanonlinesurveyofmedicalbloggers AT bruminigordana examiningthemedicalblogosphereanonlinesurveyofmedicalbloggers |