Cargando…

The Value of Ultrasound-Guided Tattooing Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of ultrasound-guided tattooing localization (US-tattoo) using a charcoal suspension for breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-four nonpalpable breast lesions in 134 patients (mean age 47 years; range 30-74 years) were marked with a charcoal susp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ko, Kyungran, Han, Boo-Kyung, Jang, Kyung Mi, Choe, Yeon Hyeon, Shin, Jung Hee, Yang, Jung-Hyun, Nam, Suk-Jin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Radiological Society 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17673840
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2007.8.4.295
_version_ 1782163501693796352
author Ko, Kyungran
Han, Boo-Kyung
Jang, Kyung Mi
Choe, Yeon Hyeon
Shin, Jung Hee
Yang, Jung-Hyun
Nam, Suk-Jin
author_facet Ko, Kyungran
Han, Boo-Kyung
Jang, Kyung Mi
Choe, Yeon Hyeon
Shin, Jung Hee
Yang, Jung-Hyun
Nam, Suk-Jin
author_sort Ko, Kyungran
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of ultrasound-guided tattooing localization (US-tattoo) using a charcoal suspension for breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-four nonpalpable breast lesions in 134 patients (mean age 47 years; range 30-74 years) were marked with a charcoal suspension under US guidance. The medical records associated with the US-tattoo, the pathology results and the follow-up US results were reviewed. RESULTS: The average size of the localized lesions was 1.0 cm. The procedure time was < 5 minutes (range, 2-10 minutes) per lesion. The US-tattoo was well tolerated in all cases. The only technical difficulty encountered was a needle tip blockage caused by a large charcoal particle (4.9%). The surgeon easily identified the tattoo with the exception one case. In addition, surgery could be safely delayed from one to 57 days after the making US-tattoo. The pathology result was benign in 108 cases, borderline in five, and malignant in 51. The excised specimen was < 4 cm in 76.6% (82/107) of the benign cases (mean; 2.7 cm). The pathologist could identify the mass around the tattoo and was able to make a specific diagnosis in 81.3% (87/107) of benign lesions. The only complication encountered was residual charcoal marking along the incision scar (3.6%). All follow-up US documented the removal of the lesions. CONCLUSION: An US-tattoo for nonpalpable breast lesions is a very simple and accurate method that can help surgeons design and schedule an open biopsy.
format Text
id pubmed-2627157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher The Korean Radiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26271572009-02-17 The Value of Ultrasound-Guided Tattooing Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions Ko, Kyungran Han, Boo-Kyung Jang, Kyung Mi Choe, Yeon Hyeon Shin, Jung Hee Yang, Jung-Hyun Nam, Suk-Jin Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of ultrasound-guided tattooing localization (US-tattoo) using a charcoal suspension for breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-four nonpalpable breast lesions in 134 patients (mean age 47 years; range 30-74 years) were marked with a charcoal suspension under US guidance. The medical records associated with the US-tattoo, the pathology results and the follow-up US results were reviewed. RESULTS: The average size of the localized lesions was 1.0 cm. The procedure time was < 5 minutes (range, 2-10 minutes) per lesion. The US-tattoo was well tolerated in all cases. The only technical difficulty encountered was a needle tip blockage caused by a large charcoal particle (4.9%). The surgeon easily identified the tattoo with the exception one case. In addition, surgery could be safely delayed from one to 57 days after the making US-tattoo. The pathology result was benign in 108 cases, borderline in five, and malignant in 51. The excised specimen was < 4 cm in 76.6% (82/107) of the benign cases (mean; 2.7 cm). The pathologist could identify the mass around the tattoo and was able to make a specific diagnosis in 81.3% (87/107) of benign lesions. The only complication encountered was residual charcoal marking along the incision scar (3.6%). All follow-up US documented the removal of the lesions. CONCLUSION: An US-tattoo for nonpalpable breast lesions is a very simple and accurate method that can help surgeons design and schedule an open biopsy. The Korean Radiological Society 2007 2007-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2627157/ /pubmed/17673840 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2007.8.4.295 Text en Copyright © 2007 The Korean Radiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ko, Kyungran
Han, Boo-Kyung
Jang, Kyung Mi
Choe, Yeon Hyeon
Shin, Jung Hee
Yang, Jung-Hyun
Nam, Suk-Jin
The Value of Ultrasound-Guided Tattooing Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
title The Value of Ultrasound-Guided Tattooing Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
title_full The Value of Ultrasound-Guided Tattooing Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
title_fullStr The Value of Ultrasound-Guided Tattooing Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Ultrasound-Guided Tattooing Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
title_short The Value of Ultrasound-Guided Tattooing Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
title_sort value of ultrasound-guided tattooing localization of nonpalpable breast lesions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17673840
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2007.8.4.295
work_keys_str_mv AT kokyungran thevalueofultrasoundguidedtattooinglocalizationofnonpalpablebreastlesions
AT hanbookyung thevalueofultrasoundguidedtattooinglocalizationofnonpalpablebreastlesions
AT jangkyungmi thevalueofultrasoundguidedtattooinglocalizationofnonpalpablebreastlesions
AT choeyeonhyeon thevalueofultrasoundguidedtattooinglocalizationofnonpalpablebreastlesions
AT shinjunghee thevalueofultrasoundguidedtattooinglocalizationofnonpalpablebreastlesions
AT yangjunghyun thevalueofultrasoundguidedtattooinglocalizationofnonpalpablebreastlesions
AT namsukjin thevalueofultrasoundguidedtattooinglocalizationofnonpalpablebreastlesions
AT kokyungran valueofultrasoundguidedtattooinglocalizationofnonpalpablebreastlesions
AT hanbookyung valueofultrasoundguidedtattooinglocalizationofnonpalpablebreastlesions
AT jangkyungmi valueofultrasoundguidedtattooinglocalizationofnonpalpablebreastlesions
AT choeyeonhyeon valueofultrasoundguidedtattooinglocalizationofnonpalpablebreastlesions
AT shinjunghee valueofultrasoundguidedtattooinglocalizationofnonpalpablebreastlesions
AT yangjunghyun valueofultrasoundguidedtattooinglocalizationofnonpalpablebreastlesions
AT namsukjin valueofultrasoundguidedtattooinglocalizationofnonpalpablebreastlesions