Cargando…
A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity
OBJECTIVE: The conventional method of dividing hepatic segment 2 (S2) and 3 (S3) is subjective and CT interpretation is unclear. The purpose of our study was to test the validity of our hypothesis that the actual plane dividing S2 and S3 is a vertical plane of equal distance from the S2 and S3 porta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Radiological Society
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17673841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2007.8.4.302 |
_version_ | 1782163503131394048 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Ho Yun Chung, Jin Wook Lee, Jeong Min Yoon, Chang Jin Lee, Whal Jae, Hwan Jun Yin, Yong Hu Kang, Sung-Gwon Park, Jae Hyung |
author_facet | Lee, Ho Yun Chung, Jin Wook Lee, Jeong Min Yoon, Chang Jin Lee, Whal Jae, Hwan Jun Yin, Yong Hu Kang, Sung-Gwon Park, Jae Hyung |
author_sort | Lee, Ho Yun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The conventional method of dividing hepatic segment 2 (S2) and 3 (S3) is subjective and CT interpretation is unclear. The purpose of our study was to test the validity of our hypothesis that the actual plane dividing S2 and S3 is a vertical plane of equal distance from the S2 and S3 portal veins in clinical situations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively performed thin-section iodized-oil CT immediately after segmental chemoembolization of S2 or S3 in 27 consecutive patients and measured the angle of intersegmental plane on sagittal multiplanar reformation (MPR) images to verify its vertical nature. Our hypothetical plane dividing S2 and S3 is vertical and equidistant from the S2 and S3 portal veins (vertical method). To clinically validate this, we retrospectively collected 102 patients with small solitary hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) on S2 or S3 the segmental location of which was confirmed angiographically. Two reviewers predicted the segmental location of each tumor at CT using the vertical method independently in blind trials. The agreement between CT interpretation and angiographic results was analyzed with Kappa values. We also compared the vertical method with the horizontal one. RESULTS: In MPR images, the average angle of the intersegmental plane was slanted 15 degrees anteriorly from the vertical plane. In predicting the segmental location of small HCC with the vertical method, the Kappa value between CT interpretation and angiographic result was 0.838 for reviewer 1 and 0.756 for reviewer 2. Inter-observer agreement was 0.918. The vertical method was superior to the horizontal method for localization of HCC in the left lobe (p < 0.0001 for reviewers 1 and 2). CONCLUSION: The proposed vertical plane equidistant from S2 and S3 portal vein is simple to use and useful for dividing S2 and S3 of the liver. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2627163 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | The Korean Radiological Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26271632009-02-17 A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity Lee, Ho Yun Chung, Jin Wook Lee, Jeong Min Yoon, Chang Jin Lee, Whal Jae, Hwan Jun Yin, Yong Hu Kang, Sung-Gwon Park, Jae Hyung Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: The conventional method of dividing hepatic segment 2 (S2) and 3 (S3) is subjective and CT interpretation is unclear. The purpose of our study was to test the validity of our hypothesis that the actual plane dividing S2 and S3 is a vertical plane of equal distance from the S2 and S3 portal veins in clinical situations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively performed thin-section iodized-oil CT immediately after segmental chemoembolization of S2 or S3 in 27 consecutive patients and measured the angle of intersegmental plane on sagittal multiplanar reformation (MPR) images to verify its vertical nature. Our hypothetical plane dividing S2 and S3 is vertical and equidistant from the S2 and S3 portal veins (vertical method). To clinically validate this, we retrospectively collected 102 patients with small solitary hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) on S2 or S3 the segmental location of which was confirmed angiographically. Two reviewers predicted the segmental location of each tumor at CT using the vertical method independently in blind trials. The agreement between CT interpretation and angiographic results was analyzed with Kappa values. We also compared the vertical method with the horizontal one. RESULTS: In MPR images, the average angle of the intersegmental plane was slanted 15 degrees anteriorly from the vertical plane. In predicting the segmental location of small HCC with the vertical method, the Kappa value between CT interpretation and angiographic result was 0.838 for reviewer 1 and 0.756 for reviewer 2. Inter-observer agreement was 0.918. The vertical method was superior to the horizontal method for localization of HCC in the left lobe (p < 0.0001 for reviewers 1 and 2). CONCLUSION: The proposed vertical plane equidistant from S2 and S3 portal vein is simple to use and useful for dividing S2 and S3 of the liver. The Korean Radiological Society 2007 2007-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2627163/ /pubmed/17673841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2007.8.4.302 Text en Copyright © 2007 The Korean Radiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Ho Yun Chung, Jin Wook Lee, Jeong Min Yoon, Chang Jin Lee, Whal Jae, Hwan Jun Yin, Yong Hu Kang, Sung-Gwon Park, Jae Hyung A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity |
title | A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity |
title_full | A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity |
title_fullStr | A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity |
title_full_unstemmed | A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity |
title_short | A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity |
title_sort | new and simple practical plane dividing hepatic segment 2 and 3 of the liver: evaluation of its validity |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17673841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2007.8.4.302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leehoyun anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT chungjinwook anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT leejeongmin anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT yoonchangjin anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT leewhal anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT jaehwanjun anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT yinyonghu anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT kangsunggwon anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT parkjaehyung anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT leehoyun newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT chungjinwook newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT leejeongmin newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT yoonchangjin newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT leewhal newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT jaehwanjun newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT yinyonghu newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT kangsunggwon newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity AT parkjaehyung newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity |