Cargando…

A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity

OBJECTIVE: The conventional method of dividing hepatic segment 2 (S2) and 3 (S3) is subjective and CT interpretation is unclear. The purpose of our study was to test the validity of our hypothesis that the actual plane dividing S2 and S3 is a vertical plane of equal distance from the S2 and S3 porta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Ho Yun, Chung, Jin Wook, Lee, Jeong Min, Yoon, Chang Jin, Lee, Whal, Jae, Hwan Jun, Yin, Yong Hu, Kang, Sung-Gwon, Park, Jae Hyung
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Radiological Society 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17673841
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2007.8.4.302
_version_ 1782163503131394048
author Lee, Ho Yun
Chung, Jin Wook
Lee, Jeong Min
Yoon, Chang Jin
Lee, Whal
Jae, Hwan Jun
Yin, Yong Hu
Kang, Sung-Gwon
Park, Jae Hyung
author_facet Lee, Ho Yun
Chung, Jin Wook
Lee, Jeong Min
Yoon, Chang Jin
Lee, Whal
Jae, Hwan Jun
Yin, Yong Hu
Kang, Sung-Gwon
Park, Jae Hyung
author_sort Lee, Ho Yun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The conventional method of dividing hepatic segment 2 (S2) and 3 (S3) is subjective and CT interpretation is unclear. The purpose of our study was to test the validity of our hypothesis that the actual plane dividing S2 and S3 is a vertical plane of equal distance from the S2 and S3 portal veins in clinical situations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively performed thin-section iodized-oil CT immediately after segmental chemoembolization of S2 or S3 in 27 consecutive patients and measured the angle of intersegmental plane on sagittal multiplanar reformation (MPR) images to verify its vertical nature. Our hypothetical plane dividing S2 and S3 is vertical and equidistant from the S2 and S3 portal veins (vertical method). To clinically validate this, we retrospectively collected 102 patients with small solitary hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) on S2 or S3 the segmental location of which was confirmed angiographically. Two reviewers predicted the segmental location of each tumor at CT using the vertical method independently in blind trials. The agreement between CT interpretation and angiographic results was analyzed with Kappa values. We also compared the vertical method with the horizontal one. RESULTS: In MPR images, the average angle of the intersegmental plane was slanted 15 degrees anteriorly from the vertical plane. In predicting the segmental location of small HCC with the vertical method, the Kappa value between CT interpretation and angiographic result was 0.838 for reviewer 1 and 0.756 for reviewer 2. Inter-observer agreement was 0.918. The vertical method was superior to the horizontal method for localization of HCC in the left lobe (p < 0.0001 for reviewers 1 and 2). CONCLUSION: The proposed vertical plane equidistant from S2 and S3 portal vein is simple to use and useful for dividing S2 and S3 of the liver.
format Text
id pubmed-2627163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher The Korean Radiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26271632009-02-17 A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity Lee, Ho Yun Chung, Jin Wook Lee, Jeong Min Yoon, Chang Jin Lee, Whal Jae, Hwan Jun Yin, Yong Hu Kang, Sung-Gwon Park, Jae Hyung Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: The conventional method of dividing hepatic segment 2 (S2) and 3 (S3) is subjective and CT interpretation is unclear. The purpose of our study was to test the validity of our hypothesis that the actual plane dividing S2 and S3 is a vertical plane of equal distance from the S2 and S3 portal veins in clinical situations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively performed thin-section iodized-oil CT immediately after segmental chemoembolization of S2 or S3 in 27 consecutive patients and measured the angle of intersegmental plane on sagittal multiplanar reformation (MPR) images to verify its vertical nature. Our hypothetical plane dividing S2 and S3 is vertical and equidistant from the S2 and S3 portal veins (vertical method). To clinically validate this, we retrospectively collected 102 patients with small solitary hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) on S2 or S3 the segmental location of which was confirmed angiographically. Two reviewers predicted the segmental location of each tumor at CT using the vertical method independently in blind trials. The agreement between CT interpretation and angiographic results was analyzed with Kappa values. We also compared the vertical method with the horizontal one. RESULTS: In MPR images, the average angle of the intersegmental plane was slanted 15 degrees anteriorly from the vertical plane. In predicting the segmental location of small HCC with the vertical method, the Kappa value between CT interpretation and angiographic result was 0.838 for reviewer 1 and 0.756 for reviewer 2. Inter-observer agreement was 0.918. The vertical method was superior to the horizontal method for localization of HCC in the left lobe (p < 0.0001 for reviewers 1 and 2). CONCLUSION: The proposed vertical plane equidistant from S2 and S3 portal vein is simple to use and useful for dividing S2 and S3 of the liver. The Korean Radiological Society 2007 2007-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2627163/ /pubmed/17673841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2007.8.4.302 Text en Copyright © 2007 The Korean Radiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Ho Yun
Chung, Jin Wook
Lee, Jeong Min
Yoon, Chang Jin
Lee, Whal
Jae, Hwan Jun
Yin, Yong Hu
Kang, Sung-Gwon
Park, Jae Hyung
A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity
title A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity
title_full A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity
title_fullStr A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity
title_full_unstemmed A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity
title_short A New and Simple Practical Plane Dividing Hepatic Segment 2 and 3 of the Liver: Evaluation of Its Validity
title_sort new and simple practical plane dividing hepatic segment 2 and 3 of the liver: evaluation of its validity
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17673841
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2007.8.4.302
work_keys_str_mv AT leehoyun anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT chungjinwook anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT leejeongmin anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT yoonchangjin anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT leewhal anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT jaehwanjun anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT yinyonghu anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT kangsunggwon anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT parkjaehyung anewandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT leehoyun newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT chungjinwook newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT leejeongmin newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT yoonchangjin newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT leewhal newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT jaehwanjun newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT yinyonghu newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT kangsunggwon newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity
AT parkjaehyung newandsimplepracticalplanedividinghepaticsegment2and3oftheliverevaluationofitsvalidity