Cargando…

Measuring Fractional Anisotropy of the Corpus Callosum Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Mid-Sagittal versus Axial Imaging Planes

OBJECTIVE: Many diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies of the corpus callosum (CC) have been performed with a relatively thick slice thickness in the axial plane, which may result in underestimating the fractional anisotropy (FA) of the CC due to a partial volume effect. We hypothesized that the FA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Eung Yeop, Park, Hae-Jeong, Kim, Dong-Hyun, Lee, Seung-Koo, Kim, Jinna
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18838846
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.5.391
_version_ 1782163516443066368
author Kim, Eung Yeop
Park, Hae-Jeong
Kim, Dong-Hyun
Lee, Seung-Koo
Kim, Jinna
author_facet Kim, Eung Yeop
Park, Hae-Jeong
Kim, Dong-Hyun
Lee, Seung-Koo
Kim, Jinna
author_sort Kim, Eung Yeop
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Many diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies of the corpus callosum (CC) have been performed with a relatively thick slice thickness in the axial plane, which may result in underestimating the fractional anisotropy (FA) of the CC due to a partial volume effect. We hypothesized that the FA of the CC can be more accurately measured by using mid-sagittal DTI. We compared the FA values of the CC between the axial and mid-sagittal DTI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen healthy volunteers underwent MRI at 3.0 T. DTI was performed in both the mid-sagittal and axial planes. One 5-mm mid-sagittal image and twenty-five 2-mm axial images were obtained for the CC. The five regions of interest (ROIs) that included the prefrontal (I), premotor and supplementary motor (II), motor (III), sensory (IV) and parietal, temporal and occipital regions (V) were drawn along the border of the CC on each sagittal FA map. The FA values obtained from each region were compared between the two sagittal maps. RESULTS: The FA values of all the regions, except for region V, were significantly increased on the mid-sagittal imaging. The FA values in region IV were significantly underestimated on the mid-sagittal image from the axial imaging, compared with those in the regions I and V (p = 0.037 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The FA values of the CC were significantly higher on the mid-sagittal DTI than those on the axial DTI in regions I-IV, and particularly in the region IV. Mid-sagittal DTI may provide more accurate FA values of the CC than can the axial DTI, and mid-sagittal DTI may be more desirable for studies that compare between patients and healthy subjects.
format Text
id pubmed-2627217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26272172009-02-17 Measuring Fractional Anisotropy of the Corpus Callosum Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Mid-Sagittal versus Axial Imaging Planes Kim, Eung Yeop Park, Hae-Jeong Kim, Dong-Hyun Lee, Seung-Koo Kim, Jinna Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Many diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies of the corpus callosum (CC) have been performed with a relatively thick slice thickness in the axial plane, which may result in underestimating the fractional anisotropy (FA) of the CC due to a partial volume effect. We hypothesized that the FA of the CC can be more accurately measured by using mid-sagittal DTI. We compared the FA values of the CC between the axial and mid-sagittal DTI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen healthy volunteers underwent MRI at 3.0 T. DTI was performed in both the mid-sagittal and axial planes. One 5-mm mid-sagittal image and twenty-five 2-mm axial images were obtained for the CC. The five regions of interest (ROIs) that included the prefrontal (I), premotor and supplementary motor (II), motor (III), sensory (IV) and parietal, temporal and occipital regions (V) were drawn along the border of the CC on each sagittal FA map. The FA values obtained from each region were compared between the two sagittal maps. RESULTS: The FA values of all the regions, except for region V, were significantly increased on the mid-sagittal imaging. The FA values in region IV were significantly underestimated on the mid-sagittal image from the axial imaging, compared with those in the regions I and V (p = 0.037 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The FA values of the CC were significantly higher on the mid-sagittal DTI than those on the axial DTI in regions I-IV, and particularly in the region IV. Mid-sagittal DTI may provide more accurate FA values of the CC than can the axial DTI, and mid-sagittal DTI may be more desirable for studies that compare between patients and healthy subjects. The Korean Society of Radiology 2008 2008-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2627217/ /pubmed/18838846 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.5.391 Text en Copyright © 2008 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Eung Yeop
Park, Hae-Jeong
Kim, Dong-Hyun
Lee, Seung-Koo
Kim, Jinna
Measuring Fractional Anisotropy of the Corpus Callosum Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Mid-Sagittal versus Axial Imaging Planes
title Measuring Fractional Anisotropy of the Corpus Callosum Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Mid-Sagittal versus Axial Imaging Planes
title_full Measuring Fractional Anisotropy of the Corpus Callosum Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Mid-Sagittal versus Axial Imaging Planes
title_fullStr Measuring Fractional Anisotropy of the Corpus Callosum Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Mid-Sagittal versus Axial Imaging Planes
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Fractional Anisotropy of the Corpus Callosum Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Mid-Sagittal versus Axial Imaging Planes
title_short Measuring Fractional Anisotropy of the Corpus Callosum Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Mid-Sagittal versus Axial Imaging Planes
title_sort measuring fractional anisotropy of the corpus callosum using diffusion tensor imaging: mid-sagittal versus axial imaging planes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18838846
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.5.391
work_keys_str_mv AT kimeungyeop measuringfractionalanisotropyofthecorpuscallosumusingdiffusiontensorimagingmidsagittalversusaxialimagingplanes
AT parkhaejeong measuringfractionalanisotropyofthecorpuscallosumusingdiffusiontensorimagingmidsagittalversusaxialimagingplanes
AT kimdonghyun measuringfractionalanisotropyofthecorpuscallosumusingdiffusiontensorimagingmidsagittalversusaxialimagingplanes
AT leeseungkoo measuringfractionalanisotropyofthecorpuscallosumusingdiffusiontensorimagingmidsagittalversusaxialimagingplanes
AT kimjinna measuringfractionalanisotropyofthecorpuscallosumusingdiffusiontensorimagingmidsagittalversusaxialimagingplanes