Cargando…

Review of Failed CT Phantom Image Evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the CT Accreditation Program of the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image

OBJECTIVE: The CT accreditation program was established in 2004 by the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image (KIAMI) to confirm that there was proper quality assurance of computed tomography (CT) images. We reviewed all the failed CT phantom image evaluations performed in 2005 and 2006...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Hye Jung, Jung, Seung Eun, Lee, Young Joon, Cho, Woo Il, Do, Kyung Hyun, Kim, Seung Hoon, Na, Dong Gyu
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Radiological Society 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18682674
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.4.354
_version_ 1782163533439434752
author Park, Hye Jung
Jung, Seung Eun
Lee, Young Joon
Cho, Woo Il
Do, Kyung Hyun
Kim, Seung Hoon
Na, Dong Gyu
author_facet Park, Hye Jung
Jung, Seung Eun
Lee, Young Joon
Cho, Woo Il
Do, Kyung Hyun
Kim, Seung Hoon
Na, Dong Gyu
author_sort Park, Hye Jung
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The CT accreditation program was established in 2004 by the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image (KIAMI) to confirm that there was proper quality assurance of computed tomography (CT) images. We reviewed all the failed CT phantom image evaluations performed in 2005 and 2006. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 604 failed CT phantom image evaluations according to the type of evaluation, the size of the medical institution, the parameters of the phantom image testing and the manufacturing date of the CT scanners. RESULTS: The failure rates were 10.5% and 21.6% in 2005 and 2006, respectively. Spatial resolution was the most frequently failed parameter for the CT phantom image evaluations in both years (50.5% and 49%, respectively). The proportion of cases with artifacts increased in 2006 (from 4.5% to 37.8%). The failed cases in terms of image uniformity and the CT number of water decreased in 2006. The failure rate in general hospitals was lower than at other sites. In 2006, the proportion of CT scanners manufactured before 1995 decreased (from 12.9% to 9.3%). CONCLUSION: The continued progress in the CT accreditation program may achieve improved image quality and thereby improve the national health of Korea.
format Text
id pubmed-2627278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher The Korean Radiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26272782009-02-17 Review of Failed CT Phantom Image Evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the CT Accreditation Program of the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image Park, Hye Jung Jung, Seung Eun Lee, Young Joon Cho, Woo Il Do, Kyung Hyun Kim, Seung Hoon Na, Dong Gyu Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: The CT accreditation program was established in 2004 by the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image (KIAMI) to confirm that there was proper quality assurance of computed tomography (CT) images. We reviewed all the failed CT phantom image evaluations performed in 2005 and 2006. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 604 failed CT phantom image evaluations according to the type of evaluation, the size of the medical institution, the parameters of the phantom image testing and the manufacturing date of the CT scanners. RESULTS: The failure rates were 10.5% and 21.6% in 2005 and 2006, respectively. Spatial resolution was the most frequently failed parameter for the CT phantom image evaluations in both years (50.5% and 49%, respectively). The proportion of cases with artifacts increased in 2006 (from 4.5% to 37.8%). The failed cases in terms of image uniformity and the CT number of water decreased in 2006. The failure rate in general hospitals was lower than at other sites. In 2006, the proportion of CT scanners manufactured before 1995 decreased (from 12.9% to 9.3%). CONCLUSION: The continued progress in the CT accreditation program may achieve improved image quality and thereby improve the national health of Korea. The Korean Radiological Society 2008-08 2008-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2627278/ /pubmed/18682674 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.4.354 Text en Copyright © 2008 The Korean Radiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Hye Jung
Jung, Seung Eun
Lee, Young Joon
Cho, Woo Il
Do, Kyung Hyun
Kim, Seung Hoon
Na, Dong Gyu
Review of Failed CT Phantom Image Evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the CT Accreditation Program of the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image
title Review of Failed CT Phantom Image Evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the CT Accreditation Program of the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image
title_full Review of Failed CT Phantom Image Evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the CT Accreditation Program of the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image
title_fullStr Review of Failed CT Phantom Image Evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the CT Accreditation Program of the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image
title_full_unstemmed Review of Failed CT Phantom Image Evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the CT Accreditation Program of the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image
title_short Review of Failed CT Phantom Image Evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the CT Accreditation Program of the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image
title_sort review of failed ct phantom image evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the ct accreditation program of the korean institute for accreditation of medical image
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18682674
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.4.354
work_keys_str_mv AT parkhyejung reviewoffailedctphantomimageevaluationsin2005and2006bythectaccreditationprogramofthekoreaninstituteforaccreditationofmedicalimage
AT jungseungeun reviewoffailedctphantomimageevaluationsin2005and2006bythectaccreditationprogramofthekoreaninstituteforaccreditationofmedicalimage
AT leeyoungjoon reviewoffailedctphantomimageevaluationsin2005and2006bythectaccreditationprogramofthekoreaninstituteforaccreditationofmedicalimage
AT chowooil reviewoffailedctphantomimageevaluationsin2005and2006bythectaccreditationprogramofthekoreaninstituteforaccreditationofmedicalimage
AT dokyunghyun reviewoffailedctphantomimageevaluationsin2005and2006bythectaccreditationprogramofthekoreaninstituteforaccreditationofmedicalimage
AT kimseunghoon reviewoffailedctphantomimageevaluationsin2005and2006bythectaccreditationprogramofthekoreaninstituteforaccreditationofmedicalimage
AT nadonggyu reviewoffailedctphantomimageevaluationsin2005and2006bythectaccreditationprogramofthekoreaninstituteforaccreditationofmedicalimage