Cargando…

Rabies postexposure prophylaxis survey--Kentucky, 1994.

A survey of rabies postexposure prophylaxis administered by local health departments for a 1-year period showed that very few patients received treatment as a result of exposure to a confirmed rabid animal. Most prophylaxis was administered for contact with domestic animals in situations where exist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Auslander, M, Kaelin, C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9204304
_version_ 1782163555610525696
author Auslander, M
Kaelin, C
author_facet Auslander, M
Kaelin, C
author_sort Auslander, M
collection PubMed
description A survey of rabies postexposure prophylaxis administered by local health departments for a 1-year period showed that very few patients received treatment as a result of exposure to a confirmed rabid animal. Most prophylaxis was administered for contact with domestic animals in situations where existing recommendations for quarantine or laboratory testing of the animal were not followed. Because rabies in domestic animals in Kentucky is uncommon, these findings suggest that had the existing recommendations been followed, the prophylaxis would have been unnecessary in most cases.
format Text
id pubmed-2627613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1997
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26276132009-05-20 Rabies postexposure prophylaxis survey--Kentucky, 1994. Auslander, M Kaelin, C Emerg Infect Dis Research Article A survey of rabies postexposure prophylaxis administered by local health departments for a 1-year period showed that very few patients received treatment as a result of exposure to a confirmed rabid animal. Most prophylaxis was administered for contact with domestic animals in situations where existing recommendations for quarantine or laboratory testing of the animal were not followed. Because rabies in domestic animals in Kentucky is uncommon, these findings suggest that had the existing recommendations been followed, the prophylaxis would have been unnecessary in most cases. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1997 /pmc/articles/PMC2627613/ /pubmed/9204304 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Auslander, M
Kaelin, C
Rabies postexposure prophylaxis survey--Kentucky, 1994.
title Rabies postexposure prophylaxis survey--Kentucky, 1994.
title_full Rabies postexposure prophylaxis survey--Kentucky, 1994.
title_fullStr Rabies postexposure prophylaxis survey--Kentucky, 1994.
title_full_unstemmed Rabies postexposure prophylaxis survey--Kentucky, 1994.
title_short Rabies postexposure prophylaxis survey--Kentucky, 1994.
title_sort rabies postexposure prophylaxis survey--kentucky, 1994.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9204304
work_keys_str_mv AT auslanderm rabiespostexposureprophylaxissurveykentucky1994
AT kaelinc rabiespostexposureprophylaxissurveykentucky1994